If judges can punish those "in contempt of the court," there should be a reverse punishment for judges who abuse or overstep their boundaries into antagonism.
If a judge can't be fair and impartial, they're not a judge, they are activists.
I would consider being nasty and opening up another case with this.
File that Democrats disenfranchised voters and engaged in voter intimidation saying every vote would count encouraging them and misleading them to do things like vote without completing the full application process knowing full well those votes would later be disputed and inevitably rejected, basically their vote wouldn't count but they made them think it would. That's potentially a valid case. Find some Dems and rep them too.
Even though I support Trump I'm fully fair and impartial. I consider both sides and all their arguments. It also create hilarious openings like this. Sometimes the more impartial you are the more partial you can be. Especially when your side is in the right party. Impartiality is the best possible thing.
The thing is about the Democrats is that they're stupid and always set themselves up so you can actually start also filing suits in their interests. If you do that it makes it clear how much their own representatives screwed them over. I actually recommend evaluating the double suit approach for all cases. A bad election official screws things up for everyone and if you consider the spitroast approach then you can have things intersect on them (like triangulating).
Politicians and officials are often only in it for themselves and everyone is an injured party. Have the wounded all gang bang them from every conceivable angle like a dick kracken having its way with a piece of swiss cheese until they are themselves officially screwed reduced to nothing more than dick cheese and that's the only thing that'll still be official about them.
Her opening statement in this clip shows partisanship, in claiming that the republican lawyer is trying to disenfranchise on behalf of his client, POTUS. As is utterly typical with criminal projection on the left, accusing their opponents of the exact crime they themselves are committing.
Every fraudulent vote disenfranchises a legal voter, and cancels out their legit vote - voting is actually a zero-sum game, finite number of possible votes being cast, finite number of electoral college votes on which the cast votes all swing. Taking away from any candidate helps the other and vice versa.
Conservatives are too nice.
If judges can punish those "in contempt of the court," there should be a reverse punishment for judges who abuse or overstep their boundaries into antagonism.
If a judge can't be fair and impartial, they're not a judge, they are activists.
I would consider being nasty and opening up another case with this.
File that Democrats disenfranchised voters and engaged in voter intimidation saying every vote would count encouraging them and misleading them to do things like vote without completing the full application process knowing full well those votes would later be disputed and inevitably rejected, basically their vote wouldn't count but they made them think it would. That's potentially a valid case. Find some Dems and rep them too.
Even though I support Trump I'm fully fair and impartial. I consider both sides and all their arguments. It also create hilarious openings like this. Sometimes the more impartial you are the more partial you can be. Especially when your side is in the right party. Impartiality is the best possible thing.
The thing is about the Democrats is that they're stupid and always set themselves up so you can actually start also filing suits in their interests. If you do that it makes it clear how much their own representatives screwed them over. I actually recommend evaluating the double suit approach for all cases. A bad election official screws things up for everyone and if you consider the spitroast approach then you can have things intersect on them (like triangulating).
Politicians and officials are often only in it for themselves and everyone is an injured party. Have the wounded all gang bang them from every conceivable angle like a dick kracken having its way with a piece of swiss cheese until they are themselves officially screwed reduced to nothing more than dick cheese and that's the only thing that'll still be official about them.
Her opening statement in this clip shows partisanship, in claiming that the republican lawyer is trying to disenfranchise on behalf of his client, POTUS. As is utterly typical with criminal projection on the left, accusing their opponents of the exact crime they themselves are committing.
Every fraudulent vote disenfranchises a legal voter, and cancels out their legit vote - voting is actually a zero-sum game, finite number of possible votes being cast, finite number of electoral college votes on which the cast votes all swing. Taking away from any candidate helps the other and vice versa.