Standing is a procedural principle developed by courts concluding the party bringing the lawsuit has suffered no injury and has no right to bring the lawsuit. It is too often used as a dodge to avoid deciding the merits of the claim.
If a candidate does not have standing to challenge an election then no one has standing which means there is no legal remedy to contest a fraudulent riggrd election.
I was always under the presumption that the Supreme Court only took cases without standing. Because if there was standing the case wouldn’t be at...the Supreme Court....
Robert Barnes explained SCOTUS having unique and exclusive standing. I'm guess they decided this wait for the legal process to take place. IE Electoral college tomorrow. Things change after tomorrow.
The WIN WIN Plan doesn't require legal standing. Nor does it have any of the other legal pitfalls. Realistically, it doesn't allow the SCOTUS to not take the case either.
This phase, < 24 hours for State Legislatures to do their Constitutional duty, before Electors vote on Dec 14th.
RE: Contacting State Legislatures for DJT/Pence Republican Electors
Key Important distinctions to convey:
When State Legislatures appoint a SLATE of their State's Electors, they aren't passing a law or a bill. So 99.999% of the rules and laws, which govern such normal procedures, are completely irrelevant here.
No Special Sessions required.
No leadership required.
The "safe harbor" law cannot trump the Constitutional powers of the State Legislature. ie State Legislatures have this power so long as the window is open by congress to appoint Electors.
Technically, they don't even all have to be in the same room to sign (though this is nice of course). Like signing the Declaration of Indepence, etc.
Remember this is how the Founders put in the Constitution selects POTUS's and VPs, so it designed to work even with raging wars, civil wars, plagues, 99% illiteracy, spanning across continents/globe, without paved roads, empty governorships/executive offices, missing members, etc.
And most State Legislature members 1.) are normies, most people don't know it's Constitutionally this simple; 2.) there are lots of unconstitutional laws telling them "muh democracy", "muh governor", "muh special session", and other things; and 3.) obviously there's significant political bluepilled reasons to keep State Legislators in the dark about the power they Constitutionally wield.
If they don't want to provide signature verification, we will. Add it to the list imo. If thedonald.win is a top 3000 site, I'd imagine we have some leverage.
*hugs fren. 2 Redpills: The only signature verfication should be in signing the poll books from when voting at a very local polling location (eg elementary school) on Election Day. There shouldn't be such a thing as a mail or absentee ballot to begin with; both undermine Election Integrity, and break the chain of ballot custody, and open the doors to all kinds of frauds and voter intimidation/corruptions.
Other messaging pro-tip is It's "Ballot verification" not "Signature Verification"; as it's not a lawful ballot until AFTER the signature is verified. By adopting the Dem's (legal) words of "signature verification" it moves the mental framework to "after the sale" so in peoples' minds they think it's a lawfull ballot to begin with.
I want thumb print verification. If my phone can only recognize my finger prints, we could probably create an incredibly secure platform to record votes and give users access to verify their vote was actually counted for the candidate of choosing. A user verification could audit an entire election.
Well Paper & Ink works just fine when procedures are followed, and even the fingerprints/palm prints on if put on the paper can technically be used to remove the secrecy of the ballot (aka Australian Balloting).
Secrecy is important against voter intimindation, vote buying, etc. Can't trade one set of problems for another set; particularly when not following the rules/laws is causing the problems to begin with. Enforce the clean rules, remove all the Unconstitutional barnicles, problems solved.
I want to be able to ensure my vote was counted for the correct candidate. I want a portal to login into and check my personal ballot. I know we have the programming capabilities of our frens to ensure transparency and privacy.
A million envelopes with a symbolic bullet and a signature would send a message. I do not advocate this tho as I’m not sure it couldn’t be construed as a direct threat and since your a right winger, dealt with appropriately.
SCOTUS is just fools in robes making shit up. We no longer have a government and the first step should be to form a more perfect union. The three branches of government are rotten. POTUS has foxes in the hen house. More than half of the legislative branch are compromised, and the judiciary proved their lack of worth.
I could come up with 75 million signatures in about a week. I'm assuming there will be no signature checks or ID required, because that would be racist, amirite? I'll just need the phone numbers for every Kinko's Copy Shop in the tri-state area.
I second this idea. How do we get in touch with the Kraken? I'm thinking a large sea shell directed towards the Gulf of Mexico might alert the beast.
Everyone who voted Trump send me $1. I will count them and let you know if it was 75 or 85 million. ;p
This idea belongs on an alt left forum!
The copiers at FedEx Office are more secure than the Dominion machines. And yes, integers! Data type is literally the first lesson in programming!
Integers you say. How do you cheat just using integers?
Subtract patriots. They would find a way
Standing is a procedural principle developed by courts concluding the party bringing the lawsuit has suffered no injury and has no right to bring the lawsuit. It is too often used as a dodge to avoid deciding the merits of the claim.
If a candidate does not have standing to challenge an election then no one has standing which means there is no legal remedy to contest a fraudulent riggrd election.
Agreed. If the law does not work doesn't mean the people give up.
The CCP is standing on Biden's dick
I was always under the presumption that the Supreme Court only took cases without standing. Because if there was standing the case wouldn’t be at...the Supreme Court....
Robert Barnes explained SCOTUS having unique and exclusive standing. I'm guess they decided this wait for the legal process to take place. IE Electoral college tomorrow. Things change after tomorrow.
They will just say EC has voted now, we cannot do anything. Fuck SCOTUS, whores and rapists
Is more like 90 million plus, hell so much cheating might be over 100 million. Joe cheated so much he might have only gotten 50-60 million.
I can predict the results
SCOTUS determines the people don't have standing in an election.
SCOTUS also determines that the constitution no longer has standing in the US
Facts
That's not what was said. It said Texas had no standing cause they were not harmed in any way.
I agree, my point is 75,000,000 us have definite standing. By 75,000,000 I mean the real count of course.
The WIN WIN Plan doesn't require legal standing. Nor does it have any of the other legal pitfalls. Realistically, it doesn't allow the SCOTUS to not take the case either.
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8EhtERu/for-everyone-who-wants-djtpence-/
We aren't even yet to jury box.
This phase, < 24 hours for State Legislatures to do their Constitutional duty, before Electors vote on Dec 14th.
RE: Contacting State Legislatures for DJT/Pence Republican Electors
Key Important distinctions to convey:
When State Legislatures appoint a SLATE of their State's Electors, they aren't passing a law or a bill. So 99.999% of the rules and laws, which govern such normal procedures, are completely irrelevant here.
No Special Sessions required.
No leadership required.
The "safe harbor" law cannot trump the Constitutional powers of the State Legislature. ie State Legislatures have this power so long as the window is open by congress to appoint Electors.
Technically, they don't even all have to be in the same room to sign (though this is nice of course). Like signing the Declaration of Indepence, etc.
The minimum required is: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8EhtERu/x/c/4DpMxkNWgL3
Remember this is how the Founders put in the Constitution selects POTUS's and VPs, so it designed to work even with raging wars, civil wars, plagues, 99% illiteracy, spanning across continents/globe, without paved roads, empty governorships/executive offices, missing members, etc.
And most State Legislature members 1.) are normies, most people don't know it's Constitutionally this simple; 2.) there are lots of unconstitutional laws telling them "muh democracy", "muh governor", "muh special session", and other things; and 3.) obviously there's significant political bluepilled reasons to keep State Legislators in the dark about the power they Constitutionally wield.
If they don't want to provide signature verification, we will. Add it to the list imo. If thedonald.win is a top 3000 site, I'd imagine we have some leverage.
*hugs fren. 2 Redpills: The only signature verfication should be in signing the poll books from when voting at a very local polling location (eg elementary school) on Election Day. There shouldn't be such a thing as a mail or absentee ballot to begin with; both undermine Election Integrity, and break the chain of ballot custody, and open the doors to all kinds of frauds and voter intimidation/corruptions.
Other messaging pro-tip is It's "Ballot verification" not "Signature Verification"; as it's not a lawful ballot until AFTER the signature is verified. By adopting the Dem's (legal) words of "signature verification" it moves the mental framework to "after the sale" so in peoples' minds they think it's a lawfull ballot to begin with.
I want thumb print verification. If my phone can only recognize my finger prints, we could probably create an incredibly secure platform to record votes and give users access to verify their vote was actually counted for the candidate of choosing. A user verification could audit an entire election.
Well Paper & Ink works just fine when procedures are followed, and even the fingerprints/palm prints on if put on the paper can technically be used to remove the secrecy of the ballot (aka Australian Balloting).
Secrecy is important against voter intimindation, vote buying, etc. Can't trade one set of problems for another set; particularly when not following the rules/laws is causing the problems to begin with. Enforce the clean rules, remove all the Unconstitutional barnicles, problems solved.
I want to be able to ensure my vote was counted for the correct candidate. I want a portal to login into and check my personal ballot. I know we have the programming capabilities of our frens to ensure transparency and privacy.
relax the Supreme court runs different than regulars courts. Trust in Jay Sekulow
Thank you. At least you have not lost your mind like these others
We did that, it was called voting.
If by signatures you mean bullets, yes.
signatures can be ignored. 75,000,000 boxes of human excrement sent on the same day could collapse the deep state.
Or piss off the janitorial staff
A million envelopes with a symbolic bullet and a signature would send a message. I do not advocate this tho as I’m not sure it couldn’t be construed as a direct threat and since your a right winger, dealt with appropriately.
We get 80,000,000 really prove the point.
I say Millions come to their house in the middle of the night and give them two choices. One will leave them with no other choices left to ever make.
Let's include our thumb print
SCOTUS is just fools in robes making shit up. We no longer have a government and the first step should be to form a more perfect union. The three branches of government are rotten. POTUS has foxes in the hen house. More than half of the legislative branch are compromised, and the judiciary proved their lack of worth.
Let's do this now ahead of time. Add in support while he goes to court.
Awesome we can harvest signatures through the mail. It’s totally secure and legit guys!
Buy a sniper and learn from Charlotte Corday.
No Americans have standing in their courts; only commies.
Fake news. I won't give up.
I could come up with 75 million signatures in about a week. I'm assuming there will be no signature checks or ID required, because that would be racist, amirite? I'll just need the phone numbers for every Kinko's Copy Shop in the tri-state area.
No point. The signatures would just be "lost" in the end.
Signatures won’t do shit, sadly. Sorry for the black pill
My understanding is CA needs 800k signatures to expel Newsom. Pretty sure signatures still have some validity in our society.
Then there would be 75,000,000 "lack of standing" judgements.