348
Comments (15)
sorted by:
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +9 / -2
5
Dschelsea82 5 points ago +5 / -0

I like Alex alot he is not a military leader.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
Dschelsea82 1 point ago +2 / -1

Years ago I thought of Alex as a little crazy. Now I see him as someone who was warning us. How did he get so many things correct?

2
Gesirisi 2 points ago +2 / -0

He had the documents

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
pede-o-saurus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Seriously, this.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
kraken_pede 3 points ago +3 / -0

That would work better if Texas was adjacent to georgia... maybe Tennessee could do it.

3
Loki_was_right 3 points ago +3 / -0

Georgia could always try and sue Texas, to bad they wouldn't have standing to do so.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
AroomaNuminahh 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly! Invade? Shucks; just let some of the good people of Georgia know and Texas will be INVITED for barbeque, hush-puppies, corn on the cob, sweet tea, onion rings and veggies. THEN, they gone be some butt whoopin' at the capital. (but it's all just some good 'ole boys and gals havin' a good time.) After all that is calmed down, there'll be mudd-wrestlin' down at the coast - and more barbeque.

2
FreeSniffingJoes 2 points ago +2 / -0

The correct term is ‘Liberate’. ‘Invade’ implies that Georgia actually wanted a potatoe for President, and a Hoe for VP.