1264
Dad signals not to take the vaccine. (twitter.com) 🦅 Trump Tweet 🦅
posted ago by Nevercommunism55 ago by Nevercommunism55 +1264 / -0
Comments (95)
sorted by:
71
thecave888 71 points ago +77 / -6

No, he seems to be trying to avoid the political attacks that were ready to be dropped on his White House getting preferential treatment.

36
MaximusKekimus 36 points ago +37 / -1

This

34
clownpepe420 34 points ago +36 / -2

the president is saying as our most important person, he is not going to take it.

28
deleted 28 points ago +30 / -2
37
deleted 37 points ago +37 / -0
24
shadypollster 24 points ago +24 / -0

Yup they are mRNA and are absorbed by the cell.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
11
shadypollster 11 points ago +11 / -0

Same. Fuck this. Moderna or chi com 1 or 2. Fuck that. Unleash the therapeutics.

3
THE_MAGAL0RIAN 3 points ago +4 / -1

Hate to be that guy but the mRNA is read by ribosomes in the cytoplasm which produce the viral surface protein the mRNA encodes. This viral surface protein is then presented to immune cells, which can then make neutralizing antibodies to that viral protein thus granting you immunity. How does this change your DNA which stays in the nucleus the entire time? I’m genuinely interested in learning the mechanism so please show me.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
4
yukondave 4 points ago +4 / -0

Have you taken a look at the previous RNA Vaccine to the Dengue Fever and its impact on children that did not have the fever before? So kids started dropping a few months after the release of the vaccine. It was effective the first time they gave it but found that when the kid ran into the fever again in the wild, they had no immunity and died.

With ZERO children dead in most countries. Why would they take this vaccine?

3
doug2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nobody who knows microbiologists says "ribosomes in the cytoplasm" lmao. That's like saying "we had a great dinner. Good convos, ate good food with the mouths, and then..."

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
-1
CJGodley1776 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Theoretically, they still do, it's just that they've added a whole bunch of extra adjuvants as well mRNA capability. Making it a bioweapon.

20
clownpepe420 20 points ago +20 / -0

how can they know the effects of this vaccine on women of child bearing age in 7 months of development?

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
9
clownpepe420 9 points ago +10 / -1

me and the old lady are in shape and under 30. we are going to wait till post baby pepe's before giving it a try.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
peltast 4 points ago +4 / -0

LOL, I've looked up Thalydomide, years ago. That's all I ever need of vaccines!

(I did take Polio and Smallpox vaccines in the 60s.) When a vaccine has been out for 2 or more years, and hasn't been recalled, THEN I may think of taking it.

2
yukondave 2 points ago +2 / -0

You have no reason to take this vaccine. No one under the age of 40 has died of Covid in the entire country of Sweden which is the same population as Los Angeles County (10M). They have real contact tracing with real hospitals that are paid for by the government and everything is tracked.

Notice they are making no efforts to figure out who had it already. Why would you take a vaccine for a virus if you already had that virus and now have immunity?

Here are the actual numbers from the Swedish Government.

https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/09f821667ce64bf7be6f9f87457ed9aa

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
KyleismyHero 4 points ago +4 / -0

My daughter and wife will both be using this, I will be saying I had an anaphylactic reaction to childhood vaccines and can't take this one. Both excuses come straight out of Pfizers Covid Vaccine factsheet. Please spread.

2
MNMathtic 2 points ago +2 / -0

I identify as a young woman of childbearing age.

Ignore my gray hair and 5 o'clock shadow.

15
Jaqen 15 points ago +16 / -1

The candidate vaccines are not the type you are describing. They are an entirely new type called mRNA vaccines, that work by altering your genetics to produce new proteins that attack the virus.

Unfortunately those proteins also attack the female endometrium and cause reproductive harm.

There's even a video meeting where a prominent European doctor slips and mentions sterilization while waxing poetic on how the vaccine will be forced upon everyone.

16
Merlin32 16 points ago +16 / -0

Correct! Would like to add that mRNA vaccine trials for the past two decades have been problematic.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
peltast 1 point ago +1 / -0

This.

8
God_family_guns 8 points ago +8 / -0

Key phrase here. "Forced your body to produce the same antibodies".

How do you create a powerful immune response with a dead virus? Your body encounters dead viruses every single minute and doesn't give a damn about them!

You have to add some nasty shit alongside the "dead virus" to trick your body into an immune response. Welcome thimerosal, aluminum, etc.

That nasty shit turns some people into vegetables, some it turns into autists, some regress a couple years but catch up again, some get their personalities changed, but most people or kids get a small fever and a sore ass or arm for a couple days.

The idea of vaccines is noble. But tricking nature doesn't work for very long. Nature abhors a vacuum. Wiping out 13 strains of a disease that has 1000 strains, well your only making room for the more viralant strains to become prevalent.

2
PatriotRN 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well said !! TY

7
ThatGuyWithThatThing 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is an mRNA vaccine

i believe the first of its kind

So no not at all

3
MadMaxUSMC 3 points ago +3 / -0

Actually he might be doing it for all of the above? Sounds like he made a really smart move.

2
yukondave 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why would a person that already had a virus take a vaccine? We have no signs anywhere in the world that people are getting re-infected. People that had the original SARS-CoV-1 in 2003 have shown immunity to the current SARS-CoV-2 because of T-Cell immunity.

“ We then showed that SARS-recovered patients (n=23) still possess long-lasting memory T cells reactive to SARS-NP 17 years after the 2003 outbreak, which displayed robust cross-reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 NP. Surprisingly, we also frequently detected SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells in individuals with no history of SARS, COVID-19 or contact with SARS/COVID-19 patients (n=37) “

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2550-z_reference.pdf
1
WinstonSmith1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

He also doesn't need the vaccine; he's already had the damn virus

31
shadypollster 31 points ago +34 / -3

Nice. No sane person should rely on Pfizer and Astrazeneca as they have been outed as infiltrated. No idea about the other harmaceutical companies.

Already convinced people I care about not to do this using the CCP leaks as a reason.

11
God_family_guns 11 points ago +11 / -0

And Moderna has Bill Gates all over it.

8
shadypollster 8 points ago +8 / -0

Oh fucking great so they get to chose CCP vac 1 or 2 or fucking Dr. Mengele Jr. Brand.

5
watchman87 5 points ago +5 / -0

they had confirmed members in their corporations?

14
shadypollster 14 points ago +14 / -0

123 between the two yes. Articles have been running all day and those two companies were mention. Astra in the UK first and then Pfizer later.

2
vegeta_ban 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where is the list? I know some people where I work at that I am curious about.

1
magachudd 1 point ago +1 / -0

FISA Vaccine

16
PatriotRN 16 points ago +23 / -7

Do NOT take this vaccine.Listen to Robert Kennedy Jr.'s latest vid.Mercury in them all is only part of the poisons. Don't take ANY vaccine now. They do not work. Swine flu vaccine is a n example. Prof on Tucker, "made me very ill x 10 days."

22
Jaqen 22 points ago +23 / -1

Mercury in them

Mercury is a neurotoxin and I would not recommend Thimerosal to anyone, and it is not used anymore due to concerns about safety, but a simple chemistry lesson for those who seem to need it:

Thimerosal does not contain mercury, by itself. It contains a compound of mercury. When you take an element, and chemically bond it to other elements, they are changed and no longer have the properties they did when isolated individually.

Take sodium, a soft, white metal. If you throw a chunk of sodium into a glass of water, the sodium will instantly catch fire, and violently react. It will probably break the glass it is in and send molten pieces of itself all over the place. It is terribly nasty stuff and you can't even handle it safely as it will react with the moisture in your hands and even the air in some circumstances.

Yet table salt is what? Sodium chloride, a compound of sodium. Not at all the same thing as sodium.

5
Magacraft 5 points ago +5 / -0

Enjoyed this writeup, thank you!

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
clownpepe420 4 points ago +5 / -1

what about polio and small pox?

7
God_family_guns 7 points ago +7 / -0

There is no small pox vaccine. And the polio vaccine is part of a trivalent (3 in 1) Tdap, and is the most dangerous of all the vaccines. If you look at which ones cause the most injuries.

Study the polio vaccine and the disease. The disease is not nearly as dangerous as we are led to believe.

4
clownpepe420 4 points ago +4 / -0

i heard bill gates had a new version of polio vaccine that left a lot of indians impotent.

ill def do more reading before I have kids. I've already had the vaccines ill be taking.

3
ouvrez_les_yeux 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wait, no small pox vaccine? I know it's been eradicated but there was a vaccine at one time. I have the scar to prove it.

3
God_family_guns 3 points ago +3 / -0

There isn't one available to the public and hasn't been for awhile.

0
traveravis 0 points ago +3 / -3

Do you expect to come into contact with either?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
SmartGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

They still use mercury its just at 70 quadrillion molecules/units they had to disclose but under 50 not required. Also some vaccines that claimed to not have mercury did when tested. Check my submitted for interview with vaccine researcher.

1
qwertyuiop123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah but this guy also hates Trump and is a climate change nut so you'll have to do better than him.

8
IPMang 8 points ago +9 / -1

Real men get the virus from licking a woman.

5
Duchess 5 points ago +5 / -0

Eww..

2
Alkaizer 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd rather not from a woman. I like a clean one

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
TrumpVictorious 5 points ago +6 / -1

While I think Trump is trying to say that high risk people should get it even before the White House, I do think that the mRNA vaccines have an unproven long term record. As a doc who cares for covid patients I am in the first group to whom they are offered, and unlike many here I am cool with taking it, but would prefer one of the more traditional vaccines just on the basis of long experience.

9
Nevercommunism55 [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

As a doc, would you mind giving an explanation of why you would take it?

1
TrumpVictorious 1 point ago +3 / -2

I have an older family member at home with cancer. He likely has about a year left. I’m a doc because of him and I own him everything I have. He’s a former doc himself, Vietnam vet, ardent Trump supporter, and just an amazing person. But he is at high risk.

I am willing to tolerate a small risk to myself to mitigate the risk of shaving even just months off his life by inadvertently bring it home.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
Nevercommunism55 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s cool, and thank you for the reply. I was speaking in terms of a medical perspective, sorry I wasn’t clear.

1
ThatGuyWithThatThing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ivermectin ya noob

Ivermectin is 90+% effective at all stages of "covid"

Even prevention.....

https://vimeo.com/488696323

1
God_family_guns 1 point ago +1 / -0

Noble idea you got there, doc.

Another issue I got with the Covid-19 vaccine are the requirements they have to meet to be considered "effective". According to ICAN, who sued to get the info, Covid vaccines only have to lessen the symptoms of Covid. That's it. They don't prevent Covid-19. There's lots of stuff you can take that have been proven to lessen the symptoms!

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
4
Lurking-My-Life-Away 4 points ago +4 / -0

Let the libs be the guinea pigs.

4
Miasmo 4 points ago +5 / -1

He got it, he recovered, he's immune. What the hell is going on?

4
SmartGuy 4 points ago +5 / -1

Please dont take it sir!! All vaccines are dangerous by design!!!

3
RussianLimbaugh 3 points ago +3 / -0

He knew we weren’t interested in taking that thing. I can’t wait for the media to pull another, “this is the thing that will lose him his base!” over this— especially after they have been saying, “we have to lock down until there is a vaccine!” They got their holy grail vaccine; condition met. Watching them squirm is going to be cringe porn that should probably be behind a paywall.

3
makethemwatch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol what are you talking about? He explicitly says that he is going to take it. This is just a response to some flak that WH staff are getting it before doctors

2
golinveaux 2 points ago +2 / -0

He knows.

2
LifeInsuranceCapital 2 points ago +2 / -0

Uber driver says the company is pushing the vax into them. Great way for CCP to cripple transportation

2
OtherwiseSafe 2 points ago +3 / -1

If you take the vaccine, you're a dum dum - that is all.

2
animehenat 2 points ago +3 / -1

So do you think Trump is dumb? Because he's responsible for getting the vaccine out, and he himself just said he would take it when it's available.

1
ifififififokiedokie 1 point ago +3 / -2

Stop calling him dad it’s fucked up.

I prefer GEOTUS

1
golinveaux 1 point ago +1 / -0

Take Ivermectin prophylactic if you are worried and quit this insane whinging about this insanity!

1
DonttrustChina 1 point ago +1 / -0

No he's not. He's saying he's not giving his administration preferential treatment, because 1, he's a man of the people, and 2, the only purpose of such preferential treatment would be the protection of the President, who's already had it and is immune.

0
animehenat 0 points ago +2 / -2

"signals not to take vaccine", no, he's responding to twitter bitching abt how "Whitehouse workers will get the vaccine first". He says he's going to take the vaccine, meaning he will take it when it is available for cases that aren't emergencies.