160
Comments (18)
sorted by:
13
ghost_of_aswartz [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

Doesn't the MI bar association know they THEMSELVES can get kicked out of the bar association?

They can.

Then it's no more laywers for Michigan after they run out of lawyers

Or the bar association of america can apologize and FIRE THE ENTIRE BAR ASSOC of MI and take THEIR licenses

Also, these lawyers can sue the bar association of AMERICA over this

and they will win.

In addition to damages, they should ask for the remedy to be the entire bar association loses their licenses to practcie law for 3 yrs and they are forever terminated from bar association.

It will be an ENORMOUS settlement too. Probably in the billions, possibly trillions depending on how many attorneys are affected

Keep in mind, attorneys make six figures and they're threatening to injure that capacity of maybe half the attorneys in Michigan

Never mind it's initimidating voters

11
Nekroziz 11 points ago +11 / -0

Please compare what I have posted to what has come out.

We have a lot more than just that, too. If this judge sides against us, trust the data will be released and change everything.

I have taken several measures to cloak my real identity, and you cannot touch me no matter how hard you try. I have explicit evidence DVS weighted this election 26% in Biden’s favor, and basically prove China is involved heavily.

Once the truth is set free, you cannot misdirect and withhold truth because it’s black and white. And it will ring in every Americans mind that isn’t compromised as it is more damning than anything any of you have seen when it comes to fraud.

I also have an ace in my sleeve of a particular piece of data that isn’t covered, and the logs these morons forgot to turn off.

You cannot threaten the people who hold all the cards, and if you think I give a fuck about an injunction if this isn’t settled by noon on Monday, I will take the data off cold storage and put it on every torrent site globally, and distribute it here. The only reason I don’t do that now is I do not want the legal system saying this evidence is fraudulent because it was illegally obtained, but it is of grave importance.

I expect the judge to side with reason, but if he doesn’t, you cannot stop me, or truth.

1
v8power 1 point ago +1 / -0

Colonel Waldron reported in the hearings their "white hat" hackers were logged into the Dominion voting machines on election day. At the very least they saw what information was going over the network if not saw everything.

The Director of National Intelligence will release his report as late as Friday as part of the Executive Order on Foreign Interference in a United States Election. If Trump wanted the report before the electors voted, he would have put an earlier time than the "45 days" time limit, or he'd say, "Ratcliffe, I need that report now!"

It appears Trump wants a specific series of events to unfold. If he's letting the crooks "hang themselves," then maybe allowing the electors to vote adds more conspirators and/or charges. Maybe he's waiting for Kamala to resign her Senate seat as an added bonus! :-)

A couple questions:

  1. I'm sure Trump and team most likely know everything they need to know regarding the machines even without specific information from the Antrim County audit. Why not let Trump stay in control over the release of information?

  2. Releasing information while the gag order is in place would be a felony. There would be investigations with warrants and seizures of computer equipment. Why put everyone on the audit team through that hell?

5
Nekroziz 5 points ago +5 / -0

I am familiar with the Colonel, he had a team that was was logged in to the local Dominion machines. They have very little because the bulk of the fraud occurred on the non local servers which we have an image of, and reverse engineered the firmware of. We actually have the master firmware because it was accidentally left in Antrim County. If they were running packet sniffers they may have some of my data however, I would assume any good white hat even with the machines on paper supposedly not having any connectivity past local networks, I would assume they probably did look.

The silver bullet data I have is comprised of the master firmware’s final update (dated November 22nd, 2020), the original master firmware (dated Sept. 28th, 2020) which was used in the election on Nov. 3rd (erases the weighting of the races, and connections to all non local servers). And an image of the non local server, which had logs of inbound and outbound connections, among “other” things, and an image of the Dominion 5.5 system used locally.

E.O. 13848 you’re referencing STARTS an assessment by Dec. 18th, by the director of national intelligence, and any other “appropriate personnel”.

He could, but the more time that goes by, the more time the American people have not seen the 100% bonafide, 100% undeniable evidence of fraud.

For question 1, Trump is really in zero control of the release, it started as a lawsuit about a marijuana referendum, and once certain things were witnesses myself and several other I.T professionals were called in to Antrim County for an 8 hour physical forensic audit. While Trump campaign members are aware of this data and its findings, if the judge holds this data which is of grave national importance of our countries securities hostage, it could easily be buried away.

For question 2, I know the risks, I know the potential outcomes, I have weighed them heavily. But the level of personal security I took in retrieving my own copy will be literally impossible to verify who did what when the machines also had inbound and outbound connections to Siberia, Kazakhstan, Iran, and even news outlets providing election results.

At worse, I would admit it was me and gladly go to jail to provide the American people with data that is of the highest national importance since Edward Snowden. This isn’t a video of suspicion or what have you, it’s cold hard data of 100% fraud of foreign adversaries controlling our election. If they were to place any legal burden on any of my fellow professionals I would admit my guilt and let the data speak for itself.

I am still heavily hoping the judge does the right thing and allows for a FULL release of the findings. I also am still weighing the gravity of my potential actions, but I know I will not allow this election to be stolen without this data being available to the American public, I’m aware it may change nothing, but at least I can know I wasn’t a coward.

1
v8power 1 point ago +1 / -0

The way I read the EO, it appears the assessment with supporting documentation must be delivered within 45 days of the conclusion of the election.

I meant Team Trump could have more information than we know (seems highly likely).

I see a report on the Antrim County forensic audit has been released:

https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/antrim_michigan_forensics_report_[121320]v2[redacted].pdf

I read the beginning and skimmed the rest. What is claimed is way too many ballots went to adjudication, where votes were miscounted, and there were no logs of who adjudicated. Interestingly, there was no claim of automatic conversion by 26%.

3
Nekroziz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Please read the document in entirety, the document states as I said the votes were weighted, the option in DDS was enabled, the firmware update changed that, again referenced in the document. I said the presidential election was weighted by 26%, this is a preliminary report only referencing the marijuana and school board votes as the judge allowed. Everything I said down to even the dates are correct.

Also, 26% is the weighting. If you send me a 999 Trump ballots and 1 Biden ballot on these machines, the change rate will be higher than 26% as it would be needed to change 63.99% of the vote to have Biden up 26%.

1
v8power 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you.

I see why only adjudication was mentioned at the front of the paper: because that's what happened. Now that I read the whole paper, I see that the Ranked Choice Voting Algorithm was applied to those adjudicated ballots to apply a weighting like you mention. Where I'm still confused is this: did the RCVA cause ballots to be marked for adjudication or was RCVA only applied to ballots that went to adjudication (for some other reason)?

Regarding my previous statement, I was technically right: there was no mention of 26%. ;-)

Would you know if an updated version of the audit report will be released? I'm sorry if it appears I'm trying to test you, but the document mentioned in several places that research was ongoing. It seems more juicy details will be released.

4
Nekroziz 4 points ago +4 / -0

So what the RCVA did was predetermine the ballots would match the preset weighing. So if your ballot fell outside of it, it would be reverse and adjudicated the other way.

And yes, there is no mention of 26% in it. We wanted to present the black and white data and not make conclusions based on it too much, whether it was black and white or not.

And yes, this is actually the second revision of the preliminary assessment, there will be a full report most likely Wednesday, latest Friday, with much more. Nobody sees the Dominion IP bullshit over their code being quoted holding up in court.

The biggest thing we wanted to convey was, in one rural county, more than half the votes were manipulated. There’s also multiple traps in it where data was left out, so that when John Polous testifies tomorrow and they ask him questions based on our findings, depending on some of his answers, he may trap himself where he cannot get out of it no matter how hard he tries.

Actually, most of the point of this besides the obvious was to get John Polous out of hiding behind statements. Tomorrow, 1pm will be interesting.

1
v8power 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you!

BTW, I was reminded of something when reading the Antrim audit report on the School Board Member (2) race where election night had 663 votes and the recount had 6 votes: I noticed in 2016 in Dekalb County, Georgia, a race where more votes were counted than actual ballots cast - scroll to the bottom of this page:

https://wiki.audittheelection.com/index.php/Georgia_DeKalb_County

I throw that out there in case it can be used in some way (e.g. cast doubt on what Georgia's "certification" means if they certify obvious problems, prove that Dominion has been screwing up elections before this one, etc.)

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
thesas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nazi lesbian AG for MI ... These rats playnfor keeps she not only hates men she hates the truth

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
GrayAlienOverlord 1 point ago +1 / -0

DEEEEEEEP

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0