20
Comments (7)
sorted by:
2
jomten 2 points ago +2 / -0

Printer steganography

It used to be yellow microdots. That got leaked, now its could be shades of gray indistinguishable to the human eye (unlikely, sometimes printers get low on ink), extra pixels added to certain parts of characters; Invisible to the human eye, but depending on location on character can convey many bits of information.

Or something new we havent even heard of yet. They have all kinds of secret patents on this stuff, secret service is in charge of it. All printers have it, they can determine exactly which printer, when and even gps location on newer printers.

Its supposed to be top secret they were really pissed it got out when reality winner ([email protected]) was leaking docs to the media

2
Nomoralcompass89 2 points ago +2 / -0

Paper is not a good medium for retaining fingerprints. Good idea though.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
Nomoralcompass89 3 points ago +3 / -0

Paper is an absorbent, so it would absorb the oils that make up the fingerprint.

Read this when reading about suicide letters or something of that nature.

2
aussie_maga 2 points ago +2 / -0
  1. i don't think the fingerprints would last that long after transport and processing by election staff and machines. It is not going to prove anything.

  2. my understanding is the Trump team do not even have the right to access the ballots. DOJ is the one with subpoena power and because Barr is a piece of shit, the Trump team is forced to fight this battle as a civil case, rather than a criminal one. I could be wrong though, but that is my understanding.

even if you do get the proud boys to nab a box of ballots, will that then invalidate that as evidence in court? i dunno. FBI should be the one doing this, but they dont.

1
Elkingjefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s an idea but the man power and resources need to do that across 6 states isn’t a feasible option

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0