5817
Comments (138)
sorted by:
141
TheHoeAndJoe420 141 points ago +142 / -1

yah i confirmed it all its legit.. even checked the marriage article.. came out a few days ago

87
trueluk 87 points ago +87 / -0

And not just part-owned, it's majority owned by Staple Street.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
3
BewareOfThePug 3 points ago +4 / -1

YOU NEED TO PROVE THAT JOHN OWENS AND STEPHEN OWENS ARE RELATED. FFS

2
2
GnomeLivesMatter 2 points ago +2 / -0

What you posted says that Kevin and John are brothers. It says nothing about Stephen. How does Stephen relate to either Kevin or John?

1
ZeroDeltaTango 1 point ago +1 / -0

Must be some reason you're screaming

0
BewareOfThePug 0 points ago +1 / -1

Its to get people to stop and think (and verify).

:)

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
BewareOfThePug 0 points ago +1 / -1

Its just the two guys mentioned in the images

34
IAM2AM 34 points ago +34 / -0

Can you post the sauce links then? I've had trouble finding a concrete connection...

32
BoughtByBloomberg2 32 points ago +32 / -0

The claim is that Stephen D Owens attended the wedding of Valerie Biden to his brother. Meaning that Biden's brother in law is the BROTHER of the guy who controls Staple, which is a majority shareholder in Dominion.

Problem is I think these are different Owens as it's Kevin Owens not Stephen mentioned in the article. Unless these Owens are all unrelated there is just one conclusion. To put it into Italian. My cousin's brother works at the bank we're hitting tonight.

11
unbanbigchungus 11 points ago +11 / -0

It says R. Kevin Owens attended, not Stephen. I think this is false.

6
GnomeLivesMatter 6 points ago +6 / -0

Agreed. Just based off of what's shown in the article, there is no clear connection. Plus the Stephen D Owens of Staple Street is 49 years old. Unless there's a connection that he's a nephew or some such, I just don't see it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
unbanbigchungus 4 points ago +4 / -0

No that screenshot shows Kevin and John are brothers.

2
BewareOfThePug 2 points ago +3 / -1

not seeing it

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
LiberalismIsTheVirus 7 points ago +7 / -0

"There are no coincidences" ~ Steve Bannon

2
AntiDespot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can someone please explain the whole "there are no conspiracies, but there are no coincidences" thing? It seems like a contradiction to me, but maybe I'm just dense.

If a bunch of people get together to covertly subvert and commit crimes, and there are many apparent coincidences that seemingly indicate so, wouldn't it mean if they aren't coincidences a conspiracy is happening.

With the JFK assassination...saying there are no coincidences in that case is the same as saying conspiracy and cover up. Because the coincidences are so abundant.

I'm probably missing something here. A lot of people use that line.

1
LiberalismIsTheVirus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I interpret it as there's truth in most things. If you can piece things together with good reason they're likely parts of a bigger puzzle.

2
AntiDespot 2 points ago +2 / -0

And if the assembled puzzle shows people working together in secret to engage in crimes, its a conspiracy. That's what I don't understand. He says there aren't conspiracies. But there are. And he basically covers them on his show

1
LiberalismIsTheVirus 1 point ago +1 / -0

He might mean it in the sense that conspiracies are typically considered untrue and have no real founding evidence according to most. By his statement he could mean that they're not made up since all these things add up to paint the picture. I've been watching him since the election and he seems like he is in a big belief that a lot of things are out there. People just need to look for them.

4
Kek_The_World 4 points ago +4 / -0

Close enough. You don’t think that being a relative even once removed isn’t enough to gain access or want an election to go a certain way?

3
SvixGale 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. ANY connection is a smoking gun. Period.

1
BoughtByBloomberg2 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's what I am wondering Is Stephen D Owens part of the Owens family or just another guy named Owens.

There's 16000 Smiths after all.

2
--danneskjold-- 2 points ago +2 / -0

grazie paisan

11
GnomeLivesMatter 11 points ago +11 / -0

Where is the connection of Kevin Owens and Stephen D Owens?

0
ThePowerOfPrayer 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's in the New York Times article Bridal at U.N. for Miss Biden and it's highlighted in pink.

Maureen M. Green was the matron of honor and R. Kevin Owens, the bridgegroom's brother, was best man.

1
GnomeLivesMatter 1 point ago +1 / -0

None of what is highlighted nor what you responded with mentions Stephen D Owens. What is the connection to Stephen D Owens? Or ... can you at least draw a line from R. Kevin Owens to Staple Street?

5
atomisten 5 points ago +5 / -0

this is just too good to be true. in fact it's so good that i suspect it's commie disinformation. this way they make us believe actually staple street capital is the de facto real owner, and not venezuelan communists. and in the end they make a switcheroo that biden was not owner when we already accepted staple street capital as real owner.

put this info on "suspicious" or in the folder of "might be too good to be true".

if it's confirmed it's straight up proof of clown world for normies.

43
BestTimeToBAlive 43 points ago +43 / -0

Why isn’t Lin Wood hammering this like crazy?

12
nds19 12 points ago +12 / -0

Stop the hammering!

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
NomadicKrow2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't hammer my butt!

2
ThePowerOfPrayer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because it's even more of a LARP?

1
BewareOfThePug 1 point ago +2 / -1

Because the image doesnt link the Staple Street "Owens" to the Biden "Owens"

1
BestTimeToBAlive 1 point ago +1 / -0

the marriage article does. Says they're brothers.

Basically, Pedo Joe Biden's sister is married to the brother of the the Staple Street Owens.

39
UGetWhatUNeed 39 points ago +39 / -0

WTAF??!!! This family better be in handcuffs soon

17
_deleted_ 17 points ago +19 / -2

Any day now. Right after Hillary.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
UGetWhatUNeed 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ve decided I like your idea better

35
grndmrshlgando 35 points ago +35 / -0

biden is just a straight up international mobster. the guy is a criminal among the worst there is, and people want him for president (not many but they're out there, and they're crazy as fuck)

6
Quoc01 6 points ago +6 / -0

He is a mobster. Grew up on the street of Philly. Listen to the guy talk.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
MayonnaiseChicken 2 points ago +2 / -0

So is the idiot thing just so that he can “claim plausible deniability”?

4
grndmrshlgando 4 points ago +4 / -0

nah he actually is a big idiot the problem is because he was a politician for 50 fucking years and politicians are glorified barons and rulers over normal americans they can do whatever they want with no repercussions. no wonder things got as corrupt as they did because there is zero accountability for these crazy people. it was only a matter of time before a real legitimate enemy agent would run for presidency and "win" it too. if they put biden in office they are slitting their own throats as well as 300 million americans

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
DystopianDoubleThink 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe they are crazy, but some of them know this, and it's a plus to them.

1
ZeroDeltaTango 1 point ago +1 / -0

He got about two million from aware, educated commies, another 20 million from kids and brain-dead drooling zombie CNN watchers who've "always voted democrat" but couldn't name Biden as VP when he actually was VP.

19
throwaway-5947375959 19 points ago +19 / -0

"There are no unapproved unions. Our Family will always intermarry between lines, or, what we would term 'Houses'. Marriages are arranged. In all my years alive, I have never seen or heard of a Family member breaking this code, as far as marriage goes. You do as you are told."

Dialogue with Hidden Hand

1
BidenHunter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting stuff

15
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
Ogcarvattack 2 points ago +2 / -0

fuck just use a drone.

1
Ogcarvattack 1 point ago +1 / -0

i get what you are saying though...

3
MAGAftwftp 3 points ago +3 / -0

A year after the MH370, almost to the day, Freescale was sold by Carlyle Group

1
Ogcarvattack 1 point ago +1 / -0

everything is tied together.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
9
Ferrous_Tarkus 9 points ago +9 / -0

How does this not disqualify Biden?

4
basedtexapede 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because he's a proud Democrat running for the United States Senate? Trunalumprzure?

4
Ferrous_Tarkus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Conflict of interest.

Your brother-in-law is a joint owner of the systems that run the Elections... While you're running for Elections...

3
DiscoverAFire 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can't investigate him, he's running for office! Election interference!!

1
ChuckedBeef 1 point ago +1 / -0

-Bill Barr

3
ZeroDeltaTango 3 points ago +3 / -0

It does. Fraud vitiates everything.

In an election, if you commit fraud you lose. Period.

8
pxmose 8 points ago +8 / -0

The priest's name was Keck...

Valerie Biden, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Joseph R. Biden of Wilmington, Del., was married yesterday morning to John T. Owens, son of Mr. and Mrs. John A. Owens of Garden City and Westhampton Beach, L. I.

The ceremony was performed by the Rev. Robert Keck, a Roman Catholic priest, in the chapel at the Church Center of the United Nations. After the ceremony the wedding party boarded the tugboat, Jane McAllister, for a cruise around Manhattan. A reception was held at the Carlyle.

Maureen M. Greco was matron of honor and R. Kevin Owens, the bridegroom's brother, was best man.

The bride served as campaign manager for her brother, Senator Joe Biden, the Delaware Democrat, in 1972. She graduated from the University of Delaware and formerly taught social studies at the Wilmington Friends School.

Mr. Owens is a partner in the Wilmington law firm of Walsh, Monzack & Owens. He was formerly depuy attorney general of Pennsylvania. He was graduated from Holy Cross College and Syracuse University College of Law.

https://www.nytimes.com/1975/10/12/archives/bridal-at-un-for-miss-biden.html

0
Cocobolo 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ergo KEK is Catholic

8
jehrumayuh 8 points ago +8 / -0

Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Diane Feinstein’s husband, jose Biden’s brother all major share holders in Dominon.

3
EdisonHwy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Savvy investors, no doubt.

7
BoughtByBloomberg2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Are these the same Ownes? Stephen D Ownes =/= Kevin Owens.

7
BluestedSRT 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well imagine my shark

3
_deleted_ 3 points ago +4 / -1

I'm imagining it has many teeth.

7
Nowsthetime 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wow.

6
Grix82 6 points ago +6 / -0

wow

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
TCPatriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's been said that Ryder is deep in the human trafficking business.

4
Prometheus76 4 points ago +4 / -0

Timothy McVeigh used a Ryder truck (which was conspicuously mentioned in many news articles) when he set off the Oklahoma City bombing.

If you owned a rental truck company, wouldn't you do everything you could to keep the name of your company a secret if it was involved in a bombing of a government building? Unless you wanted certain people to know.

1
TXRanger 1 point ago +1 / -0

True

4
atomisten 4 points ago +4 / -0

this is just too good to be true. in fact it's so good that i suspect it's commie disinformation. this way they make us believe actually staple street capital is the de facto real owner, and not venezuelan communists. and in the end they make a switcheroo that biden was not owner when we already accepted staple street capital as real owner.

put this info on "suspicious" or in the folder of "might be too good to be true".

if it's confirmed then it's straight up proof of clown world for normies.

4
shinzoabe 4 points ago +4 / -0

wtf

3
Patriots4maga 3 points ago +3 / -0

This must be a sticky!

3
scotboyturbo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thought her Husband's name is John Owens...

3
Qbaby 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gonna need more bullets for the firing squad.

3
Nadlers_Diaper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pedo Joe -> (sister) Valerie Biden Owens -> (marriage) John T. Owens -> (brother) R. Kevin Owens -> (?, likely son) Stephen D. Owens

Kevin and Stephen get you to 3 big bads -> Staple Street, Carlyle Group and Cerebus Management

2
Liawatha 2 points ago +2 / -0

the swamp runs so deep. We're going to need a bigger plunger

2
Rubberbunnies 2 points ago +2 / -0

No job is too big for Kamala, she can go deep enough and suck that clog right out!

2
VerGreeneyes 2 points ago +2 / -0

The missing link here is the relationship between R. Kevin Owens and Stephen D. Owens. The image shows them side by side but I don't think that info is from the same page. Are they closely related?

2
circusmonkey 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is why RINO (i.e. Democrat) Governors are fighting so hard against Trump. They all got elected using this scheme!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Anticommie_injection 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is that on the side of the family that Hunter has fucked?

2
shark62174 2 points ago +2 / -0

WOW. I guess Biden should have recused himself. Conflict of interest and all that.;-)

2
CrankyCrab 2 points ago +2 / -0

All these relationships with dems, chi-coms, corporations and other traitors are incestuous. One big fucking spider web.

WTFover...

2
Destineed369 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m more surprised there’s not more obvious connections.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Joyly 2 points ago +2 / -0

When trump is inaugurated and Biden and the rest of these crooks are still not in cuffs I will be pissed. We need justice. There’s more than enough proof to get them TODAY.

2
Xenovista 2 points ago +2 / -0

Holy shit

2
circusmonkey 2 points ago +2 / -0

Holy sh*t!

2
MatthewDiDonato 2 points ago +2 / -0

Most secure election in history!

1
tokenninja 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s not the one whose votes that counts.

1
MAGAAllTheTime 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gives new meaning to “we have the most extensive fraud network” doesn’t it?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
KurtTingles 1 point ago +1 / -0

So... wouldn't that mean some sort of Conflict of Interests? Surely that would look suspicious in the eyes of voters if they saw that pre-election. Just like a candidate's son under federal investigation. I might be crazy though....

1
Rreidy8286 1 point ago +1 / -0

Geez, at least try to hide it.

1
HookInMouth 1 point ago +2 / -1

Why does this not even surprise me. I am so disgusted with everything at this point. Thank God we have DJT fighting for us.

1
smartass 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is seriously WTF

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Dessert4TWO69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks better. More evidence means more likely that the fraud is overturned!

We are Overturning the Fruad!

1
freedomdogs 1 point ago +1 / -0

More likely that patriot fence sitters take up arms and more likely that Democrats don’t fight for a criminal enterprise that has used them as pawns.

1
Dessert4TWO69 1 point ago +1 / -0

What ever gets the job done. It is a job worth doing!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
djmarcone 1 point ago +1 / -0

well, that's a bit of a conflict of interest.

1
ZeroDeltaTango 1 point ago +1 / -0

The entire Biden family fortune will be frozen, because working with a foreign enemy to defraud our election.

Also, I found this. Look what happens when FOREIGN assets get frozen. First this:

According to material that Bethany Kohl Hipp, “Defending Expanded Presidential Authority to Regulate Foreign Assets and Transactions,” 17 Emory Inter’l L. Rev. 1311, 1345 - 1346( 2003)(citations omitted), gleaned from Emergency Controls on International Economic Transactions: Hearing on H.R. 1560 and H.R. 2382 Before the Subcomm. On Int’l Econ. Policy & Trade, House Comm. on Int’l Relations & Markup of Trading with the Enemy Reform Legislation, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., n. 30, at 51 (1977):

Freezing, or blocking, is not taking assets; rather it is a short- or long-term deprivation of the assets or the usage thereof. Freezing does not involve a transfer of title. For example, during World War II, both German and Dutch assets held in the United States were frozen. German assets were subsequently vested in the United States—title passed from Germany or nationals thereof to the United States. The Court held that the vesting of German property was not a compensable taking because the Fifth Amendment does not apply to enemy property. Conversely, Dutch assets were never vested. The blocking, or freezing, and vesting of foreign assets have never been held to be unconstitutional.

Then the next paragraph, though, points out THIS little nugget:

Act of December 18, 1941, ch. 593, § 301, 55 Stat. 838, 839 - 841, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. The statute provided, inter alia, that “any property or interest of any foreign country or national thereof shall vest, when, as, and upon the terms, directed by the President, in such agency or person as may be designated from time to time by the President, and upon such terms and conditions as the President may prescribe such interest or property shall be held, used, administered, liquidated, sold, or otherwise dealt with in the interest of and for the benefit of the United States.” Id. at 840

Opinions welcome as to apparent discrepancy regarding whether we get to confiscate, or merely freeze all assets of China and their puppets in the US

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:woYsl42mq0IJ:https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL34254.pdf+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-b-1-d

1
dridas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow! That’s good stuff. Curious why Lin Wood isn’t all over this, or maybe he too holds back.

1
letienphat1 1 point ago +1 / -0

they marry to each others, and shit. this is some medieval royals shit