5817
Comments (138)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
141
TheHoeAndJoe420 141 points ago +142 / -1

yah i confirmed it all its legit.. even checked the marriage article.. came out a few days ago

87
trueluk 87 points ago +87 / -0

And not just part-owned, it's majority owned by Staple Street.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
3
BewareOfThePug 3 points ago +4 / -1

YOU NEED TO PROVE THAT JOHN OWENS AND STEPHEN OWENS ARE RELATED. FFS

1
ZeroDeltaTango 1 point ago +1 / -0

Must be some reason you're screaming

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
34
IAM2AM 34 points ago +34 / -0

Can you post the sauce links then? I've had trouble finding a concrete connection...

32
BoughtByBloomberg2 32 points ago +32 / -0

The claim is that Stephen D Owens attended the wedding of Valerie Biden to his brother. Meaning that Biden's brother in law is the BROTHER of the guy who controls Staple, which is a majority shareholder in Dominion.

Problem is I think these are different Owens as it's Kevin Owens not Stephen mentioned in the article. Unless these Owens are all unrelated there is just one conclusion. To put it into Italian. My cousin's brother works at the bank we're hitting tonight.

11
unbanbigchungus 11 points ago +11 / -0

It says R. Kevin Owens attended, not Stephen. I think this is false.

6
GnomeLivesMatter 6 points ago +6 / -0

Agreed. Just based off of what's shown in the article, there is no clear connection. Plus the Stephen D Owens of Staple Street is 49 years old. Unless there's a connection that he's a nephew or some such, I just don't see it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
LiberalismIsTheVirus 7 points ago +7 / -0

"There are no coincidences" ~ Steve Bannon

2
AntiDespot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can someone please explain the whole "there are no conspiracies, but there are no coincidences" thing? It seems like a contradiction to me, but maybe I'm just dense.

If a bunch of people get together to covertly subvert and commit crimes, and there are many apparent coincidences that seemingly indicate so, wouldn't it mean if they aren't coincidences a conspiracy is happening.

With the JFK assassination...saying there are no coincidences in that case is the same as saying conspiracy and cover up. Because the coincidences are so abundant.

I'm probably missing something here. A lot of people use that line.

4
Kek_The_World 4 points ago +4 / -0

Close enough. You don’t think that being a relative even once removed isn’t enough to gain access or want an election to go a certain way?

3
SvixGale 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. ANY connection is a smoking gun. Period.

1
BoughtByBloomberg2 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's what I am wondering Is Stephen D Owens part of the Owens family or just another guy named Owens.

There's 16000 Smiths after all.

2
--danneskjold-- 2 points ago +2 / -0

grazie paisan

11
GnomeLivesMatter 11 points ago +11 / -0

Where is the connection of Kevin Owens and Stephen D Owens?

0
ThePowerOfPrayer 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's in the New York Times article Bridal at U.N. for Miss Biden and it's highlighted in pink.

Maureen M. Green was the matron of honor and R. Kevin Owens, the bridgegroom's brother, was best man.

1
GnomeLivesMatter 1 point ago +1 / -0

None of what is highlighted nor what you responded with mentions Stephen D Owens. What is the connection to Stephen D Owens? Or ... can you at least draw a line from R. Kevin Owens to Staple Street?

5
atomisten 5 points ago +5 / -0

this is just too good to be true. in fact it's so good that i suspect it's commie disinformation. this way they make us believe actually staple street capital is the de facto real owner, and not venezuelan communists. and in the end they make a switcheroo that biden was not owner when we already accepted staple street capital as real owner.

put this info on "suspicious" or in the folder of "might be too good to be true".

if it's confirmed it's straight up proof of clown world for normies.