The claim is that Stephen D Owens attended the wedding of Valerie Biden to his brother. Meaning that Biden's brother in law is the BROTHER of the guy who controls Staple, which is a majority shareholder in Dominion.
Problem is I think these are different Owens as it's Kevin Owens not Stephen mentioned in the article. Unless these Owens are all unrelated there is just one conclusion. To put it into Italian. My cousin's brother works at the bank we're hitting tonight.
Agreed. Just based off of what's shown in the article, there is no clear connection. Plus the Stephen D Owens of Staple Street is 49 years old. Unless there's a connection that he's a nephew or some such, I just don't see it.
Can someone please explain the whole "there are no conspiracies, but there are no coincidences" thing? It seems like a contradiction to me, but maybe I'm just dense.
If a bunch of people get together to covertly subvert and commit crimes, and there are many apparent coincidences that seemingly indicate so, wouldn't it mean if they aren't coincidences a conspiracy is happening.
With the JFK assassination...saying there are no coincidences in that case is the same as saying conspiracy and cover up. Because the coincidences are so abundant.
I'm probably missing something here. A lot of people use that line.
And if the assembled puzzle shows people working together in secret to engage in crimes, its a conspiracy. That's what I don't understand. He says there aren't conspiracies. But there are. And he basically covers them on his show
The claim is that Stephen D Owens attended the wedding of Valerie Biden to his brother. Meaning that Biden's brother in law is the BROTHER of the guy who controls Staple, which is a majority shareholder in Dominion.
Problem is I think these are different Owens as it's Kevin Owens not Stephen mentioned in the article. Unless these Owens are all unrelated there is just one conclusion. To put it into Italian. My cousin's brother works at the bank we're hitting tonight.
It says R. Kevin Owens attended, not Stephen. I think this is false.
Agreed. Just based off of what's shown in the article, there is no clear connection. Plus the Stephen D Owens of Staple Street is 49 years old. Unless there's a connection that he's a nephew or some such, I just don't see it.
No that screenshot shows Kevin and John are brothers.
not seeing it
"There are no coincidences" ~ Steve Bannon
Can someone please explain the whole "there are no conspiracies, but there are no coincidences" thing? It seems like a contradiction to me, but maybe I'm just dense.
If a bunch of people get together to covertly subvert and commit crimes, and there are many apparent coincidences that seemingly indicate so, wouldn't it mean if they aren't coincidences a conspiracy is happening.
With the JFK assassination...saying there are no coincidences in that case is the same as saying conspiracy and cover up. Because the coincidences are so abundant.
I'm probably missing something here. A lot of people use that line.
I interpret it as there's truth in most things. If you can piece things together with good reason they're likely parts of a bigger puzzle.
And if the assembled puzzle shows people working together in secret to engage in crimes, its a conspiracy. That's what I don't understand. He says there aren't conspiracies. But there are. And he basically covers them on his show
Close enough. You don’t think that being a relative even once removed isn’t enough to gain access or want an election to go a certain way?
Exactly. ANY connection is a smoking gun. Period.
That's what I am wondering Is Stephen D Owens part of the Owens family or just another guy named Owens.
There's 16000 Smiths after all.
grazie paisan