I have no clue if the story is fake or not, but 4chan's take on it was hilarious. Its one of the main topics they are talking about on /pol/ right now.
The article didn’t say how many people developed the issue, but it did say that .5% of volunteers developed a “severe side effect”. So most people are more likely to get a severe side effect from the vaccine than they are to die from corona. So safe!
Yep. So you can get the vaccine and have a .5% chance of getting a serious side effect. Then you have to take into consideration the scaling of multiple vaccines potentially every month. That .5% is gonna come around eventually for a lot of people. How many times were these test subjects tested should be asked. There is a chance you won't even know you have covid / flu, and even if you do, the survival rate for it Trumps the risk chance of the vaccine. It's more dangerous to get the vaccine than it is to have Covid even in later age groups.
I saw a Reddit thread saying those numbers are in line with the general population rate for Bell’s Palsy and to immediately stop fearmongering Pfizer’s vaccine.
That’s rich, coming from the smoothbrains fearmongering about COVID 24/7.
Yup which is great for red pilling lefties, as their go to retort when told that corona has a death rate of less than 1% is “that’s a lot when millions get the virus!”
Thanks for the reply. Wifey is a nurse and when I told her that four people may have gotten Bell's palsy after taking the vaccine, she had quite a reaction.
Yeah, and only 4 people had it happen with the vaccine. Was it 4 out of 4? Or 4 out of 40,000? Those are two very different numbers and their relationship to "zero percent" is also very different.
The article didn't mention the total number given the vaccine or the placebo, it just said that 4 was roughly the same as the general population. That means that neither 4 nor 0 have any meaning in that situation, as they are both within the margin of error, unfortunately.
I want to know absolute totals for both numbers before I make a judgment. Bell's Palsy can be expected to affect around 1 in 30-40,000 people in a year. If the sample size was even as small as 1000, 4 is still within the margin of error for biological effects. If it was 200,000 people, I'm actually more interested in why no one had it in the control group.
I didn't skip that, and I won't be taking this vaccine, but your argument has one major flaw.
You are comparing fatality rate to the rate of side effects. All other things being equal, I would prefer bell's palsy to death. I think everyone would. You can't compare those two frequencies when they are of drastically different severity.
Again, for this disease literally no one even knows what to do because they are lying about the numbers so badly, but just in general you shouldn't compare those two numbers.
All I'm saying is that 25 yo healthy female has basically zero risk of dying from Corona, but is taking on an unknown risk of infertility, and 0.5% risk of serious side effects from the vaccine.
Doesn't it seem like she would be better off asking to be infected with the virus?
It would offer the same immunity without the risk.
Fuck no it’s not temporary. Nerve damage and muscle wasting is what it is. Doctors generally hope to get an 85% recovery which is enough to not have Stallone face. A small amount of people, like myself, get really lucky and get 95% recovery with little permanent paralysis. Some people get unlucky and recover very little.
Unfortunately alot of normies will take the vaccine, because they assume it is safe and will cause a return to normalcy. Not everyone who will take it is actually a moron, they just unfortunately are not in the loop...
In order to make this an effective red-pilling weapon we need to know three things.
Is this story verified?
Are the people pictured the victims, or just pics of people with Bell's Palsy?
Four people developed this out of how many?
I have no clue if the story is fake or not, but 4chan's take on it was hilarious. Its one of the main topics they are talking about on /pol/ right now.
The article didn’t say how many people developed the issue, but it did say that .5% of volunteers developed a “severe side effect”. So most people are more likely to get a severe side effect from the vaccine than they are to die from corona. So safe!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9030943/Four-volunteers-got-Pfizers-vaccine-developed-Bells-palsy.html
.5% is a lot when you look at vaccinating millions.
Yep. So you can get the vaccine and have a .5% chance of getting a serious side effect. Then you have to take into consideration the scaling of multiple vaccines potentially every month. That .5% is gonna come around eventually for a lot of people. How many times were these test subjects tested should be asked. There is a chance you won't even know you have covid / flu, and even if you do, the survival rate for it Trumps the risk chance of the vaccine. It's more dangerous to get the vaccine than it is to have Covid even in later age groups.
I saw a Reddit thread saying those numbers are in line with the general population rate for Bell’s Palsy and to immediately stop fearmongering Pfizer’s vaccine.
That’s rich, coming from the smoothbrains fearmongering about COVID 24/7.
How does the general population get Bell's Palsy?
Yup which is great for red pilling lefties, as their go to retort when told that corona has a death rate of less than 1% is “that’s a lot when millions get the virus!”
Thanks - finally a link to an actual article!
Ok thanks for the reply, fren.
And what are the odds a random set of people in a population that size develop Bells palsy normally
Thanks for the reply. Wifey is a nurse and when I told her that four people may have gotten Bell's palsy after taking the vaccine, she had quite a reaction.
So did the volunteers.
ba-dum-pssh
why you dirty rat..
Meh see
The last point is the important one. According to the article, it's roughly the same rate as the general population.
That's pretty fungible though.
Zero percent had it happen with placebo.
Two of people got Bell's within 9 days of getting the vaccine.
When they say it is roughly the same rate, did they look at your chance of getting it within a 9-day timespan, or some other timespan?
With numbers like 2 and 4 of course it isn't proof of anything but the article also said that
Which is quite alarming, considering at 25 year old female has a 0.0002% chance of dying if infected by the actual virus.
Why the hell would they ever want this stupid vaccine?
It would make more sense to offer them to be infected with the actual virus.
Yeah, and only 4 people had it happen with the vaccine. Was it 4 out of 4? Or 4 out of 40,000? Those are two very different numbers and their relationship to "zero percent" is also very different.
The article didn't mention the total number given the vaccine or the placebo, it just said that 4 was roughly the same as the general population. That means that neither 4 nor 0 have any meaning in that situation, as they are both within the margin of error, unfortunately.
I want to know absolute totals for both numbers before I make a judgment. Bell's Palsy can be expected to affect around 1 in 30-40,000 people in a year. If the sample size was even as small as 1000, 4 is still within the margin of error for biological effects. If it was 200,000 people, I'm actually more interested in why no one had it in the control group.
You seemed to have skipped over this:
Which is much higher than the risk of death if you become infected with the actual virus if you are younger than 70 and have no co-morbidities.
I think most Americans would be better off becoming infected with the virus than taking the vaccine.
I didn't skip that, and I won't be taking this vaccine, but your argument has one major flaw.
You are comparing fatality rate to the rate of side effects. All other things being equal, I would prefer bell's palsy to death. I think everyone would. You can't compare those two frequencies when they are of drastically different severity.
Again, for this disease literally no one even knows what to do because they are lying about the numbers so badly, but just in general you shouldn't compare those two numbers.
Nowhere am I equating Bell's Palsy to death.
All I'm saying is that 25 yo healthy female has basically zero risk of dying from Corona, but is taking on an unknown risk of infertility, and 0.5% risk of serious side effects from the vaccine.
Doesn't it seem like she would be better off asking to be infected with the virus?
It would offer the same immunity without the risk.
This vaccine turns you into Greta Thunberg - CONFIRMED
When everyone is a functionally retarded autistic gnome, no one is.
One on the right looks like Vincent Donofrio in Men In Black
something tells me she will be playing with marbles in her near future too.
Ha ha ha
Fuck no it’s not temporary. Nerve damage and muscle wasting is what it is. Doctors generally hope to get an 85% recovery which is enough to not have Stallone face. A small amount of people, like myself, get really lucky and get 95% recovery with little permanent paralysis. Some people get unlucky and recover very little.
Interesting. Back in March I developed bells palsy. After getting sick from which I would imagine was covid?
muH FaKe NeWs...
hahaha this vaccine really looks safe.
Just showed my GF. She said, "That's how we can identify the morons." lol
Unfortunately alot of normies will take the vaccine, because they assume it is safe and will cause a return to normalcy. Not everyone who will take it is actually a moron, they just unfortunately are not in the loop...
Ok, but why did the girl on the left only put makeup on one eye???
That’s what winning looks like.... right?
Do you get a free cigar...
I feel bad for those people.
Same, but they really should not have trusted this aberration of a vaccine.
You forgot the part where the vaccine gave the recipent finger gun for the extra cool factor
USE CODE RUDY20 for 20% off your next cigar order!
LOL
Wiseguy syndrome lol
I cracked up
Damn...Bahahaha
I laughed way too hard. Why does the woman on the left only have eye makeup on the functioning side though? Kind of accentuates it a little bit...
https://www.filmandfurniture.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/0415975e197ea6ab834a9651c3ae893b-clock-work-stanley-kubrick.jpg
Helllloooooooo (in Jerry Seinfeld voice)
Nyah
A+
Dreamworks movies were predictive programming.
Need monocles.
This explains AOC
Greta Thunberg was the first person to receive the Pfizer vaccine.
https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/809e14d4f67391a758bd6dd6db28c80e
Change my mind.
its only .02% guys! But the kkk has 5000 members in the US! theyre the real threat! 0.0001 is more than .02
All this and the "immunity" lasts for 6 months until the next wuflu season.... LOL dumb fucks.
"Come in here dear boy have a cigar, you're gonna go far...."
I laughed way too hard. Why does the woman on the left only have eye makeup on the functioning side though? Kind of accentuates it a little bit...
LITERAL JOKER FACES
ARE WE READY TO OPEN THE FUCKING COUNTRY AND BURN THE MASKS YET?