I didn't skip that, and I won't be taking this vaccine, but your argument has one major flaw.
You are comparing fatality rate to the rate of side effects. All other things being equal, I would prefer bell's palsy to death. I think everyone would. You can't compare those two frequencies when they are of drastically different severity.
Again, for this disease literally no one even knows what to do because they are lying about the numbers so badly, but just in general you shouldn't compare those two numbers.
All I'm saying is that 25 yo healthy female has basically zero risk of dying from Corona, but is taking on an unknown risk of infertility, and 0.5% risk of serious side effects from the vaccine.
Doesn't it seem like she would be better off asking to be infected with the virus?
It would offer the same immunity without the risk.
You seemed to have skipped over this:
Which is much higher than the risk of death if you become infected with the actual virus if you are younger than 70 and have no co-morbidities.
I think most Americans would be better off becoming infected with the virus than taking the vaccine.
I didn't skip that, and I won't be taking this vaccine, but your argument has one major flaw.
You are comparing fatality rate to the rate of side effects. All other things being equal, I would prefer bell's palsy to death. I think everyone would. You can't compare those two frequencies when they are of drastically different severity.
Again, for this disease literally no one even knows what to do because they are lying about the numbers so badly, but just in general you shouldn't compare those two numbers.
Nowhere am I equating Bell's Palsy to death.
All I'm saying is that 25 yo healthy female has basically zero risk of dying from Corona, but is taking on an unknown risk of infertility, and 0.5% risk of serious side effects from the vaccine.
Doesn't it seem like she would be better off asking to be infected with the virus?
It would offer the same immunity without the risk.