2585
Comments (17)
sorted by:
22
PresidentErectHunter 22 points ago +22 / -0

"Minor redaction" my ass. The Secretary is trying to hide something related to fraud and vote switching

5
Stevo182 5 points ago +5 / -0

After seeing the leaked file vs the released file, all they redacted were the actual logs of people going into the machine and trying to change things. No biggie IMO.

19
Graey 19 points ago +19 / -0

Oh its public now...and its a GOLDMINE of fraud. It even has pictures to lay it out for the children in government to follow along with.

13
DonewithMirrors 13 points ago +13 / -0

The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%.

In Central Lake Township there were 1,222 ballots reversed out of 1,491 total ballots cast, resulting in an 81.96% rejection rate. All reversed ballots are sent to adjudication for a decision by election personnel.

This is caused by intentional errors in the system. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency or audit trail.

The systemic errors are intentionally designed to create errors in order to push a high volume of ballots to bulk adjudication.

ONE BALLOT UPSIDE DOWN SENDS THE WHOLE BATCH TO ADJUDICATION

10
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
8
InTheArmsOfThePepe 8 points ago +8 / -0

Link to article, without paywall

https://outline.com/me9b3J

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
InTheArmsOfThePepe 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're welcome! I've found that site to work with just about every article I've uploaded to it.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
bigbossman2 4 points ago +5 / -1

even if it comes out with a few unredacted lines nothing's going to become of it, there are smoking guns laying everywhere, but everyone refuses to see the evidence that has any prosecutorial authority

2
cajun_robear 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not a legal scholar, but I believe that they are fucked.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
handpeople 1 point ago +4 / -3

Correction, MI SoS did not object, only wanted 2 minor redactions.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
-4
dridas -4 points ago +2 / -6

The voting machine didn’t flip votes. They were flipped during adjudication. What you’ll see is the error rate....likely redacted.

Speculation... Error rate is set by operator or administrator of the machine itself. If it is set too high it will flip an error more often. Use a sharpie....error. Check mark or box outside the line....error. Trump box blacked and Biden empty....error

The errors require adjudication to determine voter intent. Allegedly errors were sent to Spain or Germany for adjudication.

The error rate and ip addresses will be redacted. The error rate was 1000 times higher than legal allowable rate. The IP address points to foreign server. These are going to be claimed as proprietary information.

Welcome to the nothing burger because the defense allowed the redaction of the fraud.

1
VonBustacap 1 point ago +1 / -0

The redactions were mostly useless as the verbiage that described the screen shots were enough to tell you what was in the redacted screen shots.

It's like they were about as good at redacting as they were cheating.