4299
Comments (97)
sorted by:
115
wheresmysnare 115 points ago +115 / -0

This is a result of machine error, not human error

Yeah, no. Those machines didn't program themselves.

69
Doctor_Gonzo 69 points ago +69 / -0

Saw that too.. poor wording.

This is not human error it was human intentional

41
deleted 41 points ago +41 / -0
28
GlacialSpeed 28 points ago +28 / -0

68%

Mother of God....

14
2l84aa 14 points ago +15 / -1

The same people that say guns kill people are now saying machines make decisions

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Pumpitrealgood 1 point ago +1 / -0

poor wording, but the result is the same! The machines are corrupted one way or another and spit out bad results. DECERTIFY! Shove this news down the throat of every legislator! DECERTIFY NOW. CALL, CALL, CALL!

21
Meme_war_ii_vet 21 points ago +21 / -0

Yeah they mean it's not some lone rigger

12
lordvon 12 points ago +12 / -0

yup machine "error", human programmer intentional

7
WishdoctorsSong 7 points ago +7 / -0

Exactly, in this case human errors is "oops, some clerk counted wrong, it happens" Machine error is far more insidious, since machines are supposed to fucking work.

1
VA-Pede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could have been a pack of roaming riggers.

15
JohnBarron 15 points ago +15 / -0

Leftists now: muuh AI

11
wheresmysnare 11 points ago +11 / -0

"algorithms" It is like magic, nobody can understand it.

3
2l84aa 3 points ago +4 / -1

Blame the algorithms, not the people who wrote them.

Blame guns, not the people who shoot them.

Yeah pretty much in line with their ideology, not surprising.

15
naffers 15 points ago +15 / -0

It's actually amazing how simple tabulating votes where 1 vote = 1 vote should be.

They've managed to devise this entire complex system around that simple concept somehow. There shouldn't be anything related to formulas or ratios involved with such a simple 1 vote = 1 vote system.

8
Gadsden 8 points ago +8 / -0

It doesn't even need to be connected to the internet! I'm not sure why they would overcomplicate it at...... oh, right, they wanted to cheat.

1
D0NNIE_DARK0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Welcome to corporatism. The worst of both.

3
Gadsden 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. What idiots.

52
deleted 52 points ago +52 / -0
20
T__X 20 points ago +20 / -0

Y'all are just trying to disenfranchise the 32% of votes who were counted properly because they're underrepresented BIPOC and y'all a bunch of turboracist hate-bigots.

/s

5
Gesirisi 5 points ago +5 / -0

TURBORACIST REEEE

6
Jojobelle 6 points ago +6 / -0

its such a cisgendered white male trope to want a fair election

5
ViduusMAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0

I mean it's better than the graduation rate.

(Actual Antrim county is pretty cool and they caught the machine error that everyone else missed)

4
NoNewFrens 4 points ago +4 / -0

68 is now racist.

FH = fascist hitlers

  • CNN
1
MAGA_Flocka_Flame 1 point ago +1 / -0

Antrim county is in the first district of Michigan

0168?

2
Sheprecon31 2 points ago +2 / -0

I no fucking bigots lol

27
NZ_Pede 27 points ago +27 / -0

68%? Fucking what!?!

18
lordvon 18 points ago +18 / -0

flipping a coin probably better

12
Indelible_Hippo 12 points ago +12 / -0

SO MUCH SO THAT WELL NEVER KNOW THE TRUTH BUT BIDEN WON SOOO LOLOL- a lot of faggot judges

20
PaulRevere123 20 points ago +20 / -0

There are literal bottom of the barrel chinese knock offs of products with less failure rate than Dominion. The only way to get a rate this high is intentional incompetence.

Be ready to form a Militia and rise up! Do not let them take your freedom! Operation Legio XIII is all about making sure we can resist and survive! WHEN TYRANNY BECOMES LAW REBELLION BECOMES DUTY!

16
8
Doctor_Gonzo 8 points ago +8 / -0

I notice that pages 18 and 21 are not redacted. How'd you find this?

4
Friar_Pede 4 points ago +4 / -0

18 and 21 lost on appeal. Judge said it was already party of the public domain and therefore didn't need to be redacted.

Edit: But 19 is there so... Was this the leak?

4
Meme_war_ii_vet 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hory shit

3
npc8692 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow, this report is bad. It looks like evidence of serious crimes.

1
TheRealTurdFurgeson 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's strange is that 1/250,000 is .0004, not .0008. How could there be this glaring discrepancy?

12
LaurenDS 12 points ago +12 / -0

Is that report real? I just read it, and if what its saying is real and true there better be people being tried for treason. Every single person who touched those machines investigated.

4
D0NNIE_DARK0 4 points ago +4 / -0

Absolutely real. Trial April 2021.

4
LaurenDS 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why is the trial in April? Does that help us for now?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
LaurenDS 1 point ago +1 / -0

So what your saying is its been debunked. By someone who didn't actually see the evidence themselves?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
LaurenDS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would they send in non tech people? That doesn't make sense. I read some of your other comments. I would love for this to be real and they have soild gotcha evidence. I thought this was done by a forensic data team.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
phpcoder 11 points ago +12 / -1

Windows updates not done, anti-virus not updated in 4 years, USB sticks all over the place. Attempts at erasing results after elections. Crazy stuff.

7
datboiforever 7 points ago +7 / -0

"In the logs, we identified that the RCV algorithm was enabled."

Well, who's gonna explain that one? "Oops, I accidentally went through a series of menus and activated an algorithm I know nothing about. My bad."

5
phpcoder 5 points ago +5 / -0

Windows updates not done, anti-virus not updated in 4 years, USB sticks all over the place. Attempts at erasing results after elections. Crazy stuff.

1
NotSoSilent 1 point ago +1 / -0

So literally an ideally insecure machine. My 11 year old cousin who’s learning computers could take this thing over with a virus after 5 minutes of instruction

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
progosu 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is now more fucked up than I thought. Do democrats even exist?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
LetMeBeFrank 4 points ago +4 / -0

Demon party and their sheep followers are so demented that they woud literally try to claim 68% isn't worrisome and that everything is fine while wanting lockdowns for a virus with a 99.99% survival rate.

4
OppaiZuriZuri 4 points ago +4 / -0

Forget paper ballots, I wanna go back to the Flintstone method - a chisel and a slab of granite. Talk about secure!!

1
D0NNIE_DARK0 1 point ago +1 / -0

We’re going Old Testament. Let my people vote!

4
bewarethejogger 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can hear the honking from miles away.

4
Karl_Maldens_Nose 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Do you see why I keep telling all you people in the urban jungle to learn to code. Come on, you junkies."

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
GreatestAmericanHero 3 points ago +3 / -0

Every sackless MSM/Tech dickwad pushing the ridiculous notion that this election was anything even remotely resembling legitimate needs to be tarred and feathered in a public forum.

3
Staatssicherheit 3 points ago +3 / -0

The logical followup is what was the adjudication rate and error rate in Wayne County?

2
MerchantMan99 2 points ago +2 / -0

If only the error rate was just one percentage point higher...

2
MAGAngelo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, so the machines magically decided to become bad apples this go around?

OOOKKKKAAAAAAYYYYYYY?

2
Tucso 2 points ago +2 / -0

Link? Where is this

2
freespeech1a 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey, 32% of the time the machine is correct. So where's the evidence?!!

2
Gadsden 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now the question is why they ever thought to hold the results? This is so unbelievably errant that holding the results is borderline treasonous.

2
KAG_FTW 2 points ago +2 / -0

The .0008 really bothers me.

2
Indianapede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Will this lead to anything?

2
ScoopScoop 2 points ago +2 / -0

Totally legit, though. What the hell, man?

2
jetjetjet 2 points ago +2 / -0

"The allowable election rate error established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%."

So more than a rounding error then.

2
redstampede 2 points ago +2 / -0

To put this in perspective, an error rate of 0.068%, 1000 times smaller than what was actually reported, would still be 85 times higher than the legal limit.

In snake terms, they always talk about how potent venom is by saying how many people it could kill. This snake has enough venom to kill a small city.

2
starboard 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think machine error was done on purpose. It implies all dominion machines In every state can have this error which is in Trump’s favor. Saying a person responsible would require proof of every person involved which would be much harder to prove.

2
Kaizen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Laughing so hard, and I have been all this time about how dumb the left are.

2
EdisonHwy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Someone has defaulted on their contract.

Quality Control gets an "F" grade.

2
Goldlight 2 points ago +2 / -0

that error rate is huge

2
goone 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cigar time

1
Ta900 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't you guys know that 69% is needed for officially being considered widespread? Deboooonked.

1
Jestre 1 point ago +1 / -0

Should apply to every state with dominion

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Riggers-gonna-rig 1 point ago +1 / -0

My buddy read through this and told me the data to get these numbers is from past years (because the data from this year is conviently deleted), won't the left just argue there's no way to know what happened this year?

1
absoluteperson 1 point ago +1 / -0

How could you possibly have 68% error rate? Are they saying 68% of ballots counted are counted are for the wrong candidate?

2
ValhallaGorilla 2 points ago +2 / -0

they got sent for human adjustment du3 to e44or on ballot

1
Sheprecon31 1 point ago +1 / -0

Computer says no, right Where's my fucking handcuffs

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
FreedomFighter87 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, what happens now? Do we still need the legislature to send alternate electors?