10465
Comments (1060)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
66
AndrewCuomosEmmy 66 points ago +66 / -0

In the federal elections of a global superpower, any errors at all are unacceptable.

51
D0NNIE_DARK0 51 points ago +51 / -0

I assume a tiny error rate of 0.0008% would just be honest human error and 1% is a problem but 68% is biblical. Trump won by a lot. They wouldn’t have had to cheat at these bozo levels if he didn’t wipe the floor with these asshats.

15
Krauter 15 points ago +15 / -0

As others have said, 68% error rate is not an error but intentional, i.e. fraud.

6
D0NNIE_DARK0 6 points ago +6 / -0

Oh but of course. Orders of magnitude out of the ordinary that it can only be massive fraud. People will look back in awe at what he was up against.

12
dlof 12 points ago +12 / -0

68 is 85000 times greater than 0.0008.

If your boss said "it's acceptable if you're 10 minutes late, but anything more than that is unacceptable".

Then you show up 1.6 years later.... it's basically the same ratio.

2
D0NNIE_DARK0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Love this analogy. 85,000 needs to be memed.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0