10465 BREAKING: Dominion Voting Systems forensic report: "We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results." (twitter.com) posted 122 days ago by gamingthisandthat 122 days ago by gamingthisandthat +10465 / -0 1060 comments share 1060 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (1060) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 74 ▼ – SurfingUSA 74 points 122 days ago +74 / -0 Geez why not go for 100% error rate. permalink save report block reply ▲ 34 ▼ – FondueFerret 34 points 122 days ago +34 / -0 you're laughing but a faggot on twatter interpreted his own reality of what he read and said that 68% was still close enough to 100 so what was the big deal. Like ???? permalink save report block reply ▲ 8 ▼ – Bruce13 8 points 121 days ago +8 / -0 ... you can't be serious. Reading comprehension issues, first of all. Second, that smooth-brain faggot thinks a 32% error rate is acceptable? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – ManOnTheEdge 3 points 121 days ago +3 / -0 sure, as long as the errors always flip votes to biden permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 121 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 24 ▼ – GoldenHurrdurr 24 points 122 days ago +24 / -0 Ya know, that would be better since they can just invert the results. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 13 ▼ – Trumpman1 13 points 122 days ago +13 / -0 Why not just stop calling them ERRORS? "Oops, that was a mistake the software must have made during a power surge or maybe a toilet leak." permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – yvjin 4 points 122 days ago +4 / -0 Right? Go big or go home permalink parent save report block reply
Geez why not go for 100% error rate.
you're laughing but a faggot on twatter interpreted his own reality of what he read and said that 68% was still close enough to 100 so what was the big deal. Like ????
... you can't be serious. Reading comprehension issues, first of all. Second, that smooth-brain faggot thinks a 32% error rate is acceptable?
sure, as long as the errors always flip votes to biden
Ya know, that would be better since they can just invert the results.
Why not just stop calling them ERRORS? "Oops, that was a mistake the software must have made during a power surge or maybe a toilet leak."
Right? Go big or go home