10465
Comments (1060)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-30
DonJr2032 -30 points ago +6 / -36

I did, the first few pages don't answer these questions, neither does the end of it.

As far as I can tell, this is not an officially sanctioned audit. Maybe not, but I don't see anything suggesting otherwise.

44
Mooksayshigh 44 points ago +44 / -0

The very first page, WHO WE ARE, A and B answer who did the audit. And you should already know they had access to 22 dominion voting machines.

“ The forensic examination took place Sunday with Bailey, Antrim County Clerk Sheryl Guy, county administrator Pete Garwood, county attorney Haider Kazim, three county commissioners, a county IT technician and a member of the Sheriff’s department, said county spokesman Jeremy Scott in a release.

Also present, according to Scott, were seven members of the Allied Security Operations Group, a group affiliated with Trump’s litigation team. In the court order, the evidence cited by Bailey comes from a report from the group.”

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
Mooksayshigh 1 point ago +1 / -0

A judge has to approve it. Maybe after today they will in other states/counties.

43
DonJr2024 43 points ago +45 / -2

You again! Yeah I want to really confirm this is legit, official, will be recognized legally.

I'm going through the pdf linked. So far it looks real juicy:

https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/antrim_michigan_forensics_report_[121320]_v2_[redacted].pdf

EDIT: GUYS SERIOUSLY, IM BARELY THROUGH 3 PAGES AND THIS IS THE FUCKING ONE. HOLEEE FUCKSTICKS.

READ IT

And please if someone has legal background and has followed this, please tell me this will have weight and authority and can't be dismissed ("debunked") easily.

Edit LMAO:

"The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity."

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
1
AntiDespot 1 point ago +1 / -0

At least interrogate the shit out of some. We need some rats.

8
DonJr2032 8 points ago +11 / -3

Hello again fellow future Don Jr Presidency proponent.

For you, and all others, I'd like to point out that this idea the left is pushing about Ivanka becoming President is Horseshit. Donald, Don Jr, or Barron, no one else!

Example of Radical Leftists Media bringing forth the idea of Ivanka becoming President

2
DonJr2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don Jr maybe with Pence staying on as VP and the REAL big guy always behind him, whispering in his ear.

It's the new monarchy. Can't trust even the best Republicans on their own not to be corrupted.

1
JerryNadlerBeltFund 1 point ago +1 / -0

He shall be known throughout the Universe as Donald the Second

7
Chick-Fil-A 7 points ago +7 / -0

Here's a maga link: https://f.maga.host/IAaLS49.pdf

2
Pencilneckshiff 2 points ago +2 / -0

fantastic thank you

1
womp-womp-twice 1 point ago +1 / -0

thank you was about to do the same 😁

4
RuthBGinsburgsTumor 4 points ago +4 / -0

Your link is broken because of the formatting. Always add a backslash in front of underscores, asterisks, etc.

0
DonJr2032 0 points ago +1 / -1

Or follow this guide (yea, commie reddit, but we use the same formatting):

https://www.reddit.com/r/raerth/comments/cw70q/reddit_comment_formatting/

3
StabbingRobotRoberto 3 points ago +3 / -0

Link doesn't work...

EDIT: I followed the Twitter link on the top of the post and that works to download the PDF.

9
MrKapln 9 points ago +9 / -0

This audit was court ordered, and that report was authorized for release by a judge this morning.

4
Niburc 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sanctioned by who? It was sanctioned by a court of law in an election dispute. Who else could sanction it - the government (one of the litigants)? The United Nations? Joe Biden?

1
DonJr2032 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sanctioned by anyone? If you say it was sanctioned by a court of law, then that is what I'm asking. Where is the source that this guy was hired by the state/county/government to perform this audit.

It could be just some guy or group that is doing this on their own with public information or something? I do not know. This document doesn't say. That's why I'm asking.

4
Rhondevu85 4 points ago +4 / -0

...really? This is from a third party non-government. The document spelled everything out in layman’s terms.

1
scotusucks 1 point ago +1 / -0

now i am confused is this court ordered or not? i thought this was legit but now im worried