2170
posted ago by Niburc +2171 / -1

And America owes Sidney a parade.

And America owes Sidney a parade.
Comments (65)
sorted by:
48
manmadegod 48 points ago +49 / -1

Tucker can go find a RINO's desk and suck them.

20
deleted 20 points ago +21 / -1
19
KAG_FTW 19 points ago +20 / -1

He just reads what's on his teleprompter.

Fox has been controlled opposition for a long time now

7
Gesirisi 7 points ago +7 / -0

He could but I heard you need a broken rib in order to do that..

11
Jimmy_Russler 11 points ago +11 / -0

Tuckers a cuck, been controlled opposition from the beginning

6
meme_oil 6 points ago +6 / -0

tucker is a murdoch employee, that is all.

23
christosgnosis 23 points ago +24 / -1

Tucker Carlson is dead to patriots

11
Siteless_Vagrant 11 points ago +12 / -1

You can take the prompt reader out of CNN, but you can't take the CNN out of the prompt reader.

-13
qwertyuiop123 -13 points ago +1 / -14

NO HE FUCKING IS NOT. This report had absolutely nothing to do with Sidney Powell. Sidney's lawsuit was absolute garbage without a shred of evidence. This report on the other hand is amazing and really just proves what a grifter Sidney really is.

The lawyer behind this lawsuit (DePerno) has zero problem releasing his ground shattering evidence to the public immediately. The fact that Sidney still won't release her evidence should be proof to everyone that she is a liar.

10
Niburc [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

So De Perno had the good fortune (and/or legal skills) to get a court-ordered examination of a Dominion machine, and thus he could put a court-ordered report out there. Sidney did not. How does that make her a liar?

-7
qwertyuiop123 -7 points ago +1 / -8

Sidney did not. How does that make her a liar?

If she didn't have any reason to believe the things she was saying were true, then isn't that the definition of lying?

She claimed she had earth shattering evidence that would change the world and she would release it 3 weeks ago.

Everyone knows the machines are corrupted, that is just common sense. Sidney didn't say "I know this because it is common sense". She pretended to have evidence while collecting hundreds of thousands in donations from people who wanted to believe.

5
Niburc [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

I can speculate that when she brought forward her Dominion witness affidavit about what went on in Venezuela and other jurisdictions, and the Dominion operating manuals, she thought she had the goods, which was enough to wake America up. That is, perhaps she thought what she had at the time was already earth-shattering, and it probably was (although that is a question of opinion). So maybe you think it wasn't enough evidence, but it was evidence.

-3
qwertyuiop123 -3 points ago +1 / -4

Ok, fair enough. Even if she did lie, she did so much to move the overtone window that it really helped us anyway. I just don't think you can fault Tucker for telling the truth about her either. He seems like an honest person who cares about the truth more than anything else.

2
Niburc [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed.

2
christosgnosis 2 points ago +2 / -0

we all know there's foreign involvement in the election stealing

we know Flynn is a great patriot that was savaged in the legal assault the Deep State mounted on him

all that they did started getting exposed once Sidney Powell took over his defense

I think I'll go with Sidney Powell's assessment of matters per the election vs your hysteria

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
-1
qwertyuiop123 -1 points ago +2 / -3

This report has nothing to do with Sidney Powell.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-2
qwertyuiop123 -2 points ago +2 / -4

WHY THE FUCK WOULD SIDNEY POWELL BE OWED AN APOLOGY?

DePerno, the guy behind this report, released it to the public immediately, but Sidney Powell still refuses to release her "evidence". Anyone who still believes her after this is a fucking moron.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-2
qwertyuiop123 -2 points ago +1 / -3

Look at the title of the post you were replying to.... what does it say?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-2
qwertyuiop123 -2 points ago +1 / -3

Oh my fucking god you moron.

The post says " Tucker Owes Sidney a Huuuuge Apology", and you wrote "Agreed".

13
TheMadManDidItAgain 13 points ago +13 / -0

And a Presidential Medal of Freedom

10
Niburc [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

Nobel Peace Prize, too, and an Olympic gold medal for shits and giggles.

4
Siteless_Vagrant 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't forget the Emmy! 🤣😂

2
TheMadManDidItAgain 2 points ago +2 / -0

The media gives out Pulizer prizes for being a democrat...

Honestly, I don't know if SP is D or R.... I don't care, she's fighting for freedom!

-5
qwertyuiop123 -5 points ago +1 / -6

Sidney gets a fucking helicopter ride. The lawyer behind this report (DePerno) released his evidence to the public immediately. One month later and Sidney still hasn't released her evidence (because it doesn't exist).

7
Tallsie 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yea, Tucker isn’t obligated to just publish news he cannot verify, but he also didn’t have to run Sidney through the media shame campaign.

7
hailXenu 7 points ago +9 / -2

Too late, tucker. Apologize, then fuck off.

7
m999 7 points ago +8 / -1

Tucker = controlled OP

FUCK HIM!!

6
Donald4thewin 6 points ago +6 / -0

If he does apologize 50% of his viewers will hear it.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
Aluminoti 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cucker Tarlson

4
JBlaze056 4 points ago +4 / -0

Tucker can give his apology to his new group of leftist viewers

4
DJT2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don’t watch Fox any longer, what did He say about Sidney?

5
Niburc [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

He made her look shady, or unreliable, early on when she was alleging Dominion software was made for fraud, because Sidney did not want to give him direct evidence or go on the show at the time. Presumably, she had other things to do at the time, was preserving evidence for litigation, or had other good reasons. He kind of said that she wasn't producing hard evidence for him, then maybe she had nothing. This was after he had gone full bore against the Biden Crime Family right before the election, so when he downplayed Sidney's allegations, and never gave any real attention to fraud and election integrity issues, it was a WTF moment for a lot of his new audience.

3
DJT2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

What a turncoat.

2
DJT2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks, BTW.

-2
qwertyuiop123 -2 points ago +1 / -3

the guy you are talking to is a liar. This has nothing to do with SIdney Powell.

1
DJT2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please explain.

2
qwertyuiop123 2 points ago +2 / -0

This lawsuit was filed by DePerno, not Sidney Powell. Tucker Carlson offered Sidney Powell a full hour of primetime on Fox news to present all the evidence she was claiming she had, but she refused. Tucker then called her out and the Trump team realized she was a con artist and dumped her from their team.

People were very bitchy about what Tucker did because they like being lied to. The excuse was that they believed Sidney Powell didn't want the opposition to know what evidence she had on them.

DePerno on the other hand found earth shattering evidence of fraud in MI and the first thing he did was release it all to the public, which kind of proves that the excuses made for Sidney Powell were bullshit.

1
DJT2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Got it. Thanks for truth, Pede.

-2
qwertyuiop123 -2 points ago +1 / -3

OP delete this bullshit post. This report has nothing to do with Sidney Powell what so ever. If anything it proves what a liar she was given that the lawyer behind this evidence has zero problems releasing it to the public, but yet Sidney still won't release her evidence?

2
Niburc [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

As far as I know, she was the first one to break the story of the history of Dominion and its ability to nefariously shift votes. So to me, when a court-ordered report comes out that corroborates that, I do think it has something to do with her. As far as her evidence (if she has anything more than what she has put out there), maybe after the DNI report or in a hearing on the merits on any of her lawsuits (if any of them are still alive).

-3
qwertyuiop123 -3 points ago +1 / -4

Tucker said multiple times, and did multiple segments, about how voting machines are compromised and how they shouldn't be used.

However nothing Sidney said was true. She just made shit up without evidence and tucker called her out on it. Tucker was right. She had no evidence for any of her claims (including that Brian Kemp was accepting bribes)

For the last month everyone has been saying "Sidney can't release her evidence because she doesn't want the defendants to know what she has". This lawsuit from DePerno means everyone owes tucker an apology.

4
MakeAmericaLegendary 4 points ago +4 / -0

She can have a parade once we win this thing.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
d3plor4ble 3 points ago +3 / -0

I will not watch Tucker until he gives Sydney a personal apology and admits hecwas 100% wrong.

2
smartass 2 points ago +2 / -0

True... I hope he does.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
MadMaxUSMC 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tucker who? Never heard of him...

2
DwellerMike 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tuck The Cuck

2
Mcbignuts 2 points ago +2 / -0

Was it just 1 County or the whole state?

2
Niburc [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

1 county - but should extend to every county in the country that has similar software or machines (if I understand your question correctly)

2
OneAmerican 2 points ago +2 / -0

$#@K TUCKER! Rhymes with Buck, Sock, Cuck!

2
IDGAF-DT2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck that tucker and fuck his faux news!!

1
FuckTheOtherSide 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you are all blowing that shit way out of proportion. He comes out & says he needs to do his due diligence with reporting this kind of shit (although it sounds like he was pissed about not getting a scoop) & everyone goes ape shit. Calm the fuck down & stop trying to eat each other alive like lefty faggots do.

1
Niburc [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

To me, it wasn't just Sidney. Yes, he was entitled to his skepticism. But I kept tuning in after that to hear what the heck was going on or his take on the breaking election problems day-to-day, and it was almost complete radio silence. It is not that he was putting out stories that were favoring the libtards - but just that he was ignoring one of the largest stories in U.S. election history but for the random comment here and there. And that goes ditto for Ben Shapiro. Both of these guys have done a lot over time to further our narrative, even though a lot of people hate on them both here, but it was very disappointing to me personally for them to ignore the day to day developments (breaking evidence of fraud, collusion, court developments, etc.).

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck the cuck tuck

1
KingSweyn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tucker was our guy when we told him what to say. He's not for us, he's for our messages to reach boomers. If he doesn't do that?

1
MCScottyB 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes he does owe an apology. A big one. But I won't be holding my breath, nor will I be watching Fox to see it-if one ever comes. They completely suck.

0
doug2 0 points ago +2 / -2

I've been tryna tell you retards, Sydney powell is not some loser tick rocker. Listen to her and trust her.