Is that what you think they're going to try to spin it as?
Are you quoting something? I don't understand.
I don't think they're referencing the 68% spread in another election cycle, but this one. And I don't think there are ANY logs they're using. I think what they did was run ballots themselves and pull the event logs or error logs. Out of 16,000 like 11,000 came back throwing the error on that revision of software.
You COULD argue this, but in case they're reading our shit, I'm not going to give them any ideas.
What?
Is that what you think they're going to try to spin it as?
Are you quoting something? I don't understand.
I don't think they're referencing the 68% spread in another election cycle, but this one. And I don't think there are ANY logs they're using. I think what they did was run ballots themselves and pull the event logs or error logs. Out of 16,000 like 11,000 came back throwing the error on that revision of software.
You COULD argue this, but in case they're reading our shit, I'm not going to give them any ideas.
This comment is brilliant in its simplicity. No filler, it’s perfect.