"The VP can only reject. Not magic up new ones. The legislatures have to send alternate ones now. So if they send both, the VP can reject the democrat slate if one congressman and one senator contests one of the slates. If they didn't send any and the VP rejects a slate, then it would have to go to the senate where 1 state = 1 vote because both candidates end up with less than 270. And then there's one senator per state with a republican majority in the senate. But that method would fail because of the RINOs. That's why it's important they send both."
One interpretation of the law indicates a favoring of the governors selection, but there are other valid interpretations.
What happens if some Dem governor refuses to certify the GOP slate after ordered to do so by the courts? Some of these Dems are petty as fuck
This is only part of it... But a necessary part.
"GOP slate of electors be signed by the governor or counted on January 6"....meaning the federal court says to only count the GOP electors?
Here is a reply from someone else:
"The VP can only reject. Not magic up new ones. The legislatures have to send alternate ones now. So if they send both, the VP can reject the democrat slate if one congressman and one senator contests one of the slates. If they didn't send any and the VP rejects a slate, then it would have to go to the senate where 1 state = 1 vote because both candidates end up with less than 270. And then there's one senator per state with a republican majority in the senate. But that method would fail because of the RINOs. That's why it's important they send both."
Eyes on you newbe, false steps intentional or not. I'm the deporter elect. Watch your ass PINOCHET incoming.
You just got here fag, I'm 5 yrs into this. I'm watching you, we are not reddit.