Is it considered a conflict if one party just decides to send them? Not trying to be a doomer, legitimately wondering. Because with Nevada the house, senate and gov are all dem. That would be like the few dem legislators in South Dakota sending dem electors and calling it disputed. I saw somewhere that Pence only gets to decide if like the state leg certifies one and the gov certifies another but I could be wrong
The basis for sending them is that the states are contested and there is abundant evidence of fraud and pending lawsuits. Otherwise we could also send them for California and everywhere else. (Mind you there prob is fraud there but we aren’t focusing on those states, rather the ones that stopped counting mysteriously and then flipped in mathematical improbability.) I’m unsure about the other part.
Is it considered a conflict if one party just decides to send them? Not trying to be a doomer, legitimately wondering. Because with Nevada the house, senate and gov are all dem. That would be like the few dem legislators in South Dakota sending dem electors and calling it disputed. I saw somewhere that Pence only gets to decide if like the state leg certifies one and the gov certifies another but I could be wrong
The basis for sending them is that the states are contested and there is abundant evidence of fraud and pending lawsuits. Otherwise we could also send them for California and everywhere else. (Mind you there prob is fraud there but we aren’t focusing on those states, rather the ones that stopped counting mysteriously and then flipped in mathematical improbability.) I’m unsure about the other part.