1749
posted ago by DemonicSoap ago by DemonicSoap +1749 / -0

Yes it is true that if just 1 Senator and one Rep contest it it automatically goes to a vote but for it to TRULY be contested we need to overturn 3 or more certifications by January 6th OR have them contested in a vote. Unfortunately the amazing job that GOP state legislatures have done today does not make it an automatic win for us with Pence deciding which votes to certify.

I am by no means a doomer but I just want us to stay informed and not get complacent. WE NEED TO WIN SOME COURT CASES AND MAKE SURE THAT OUR SO CALLED REPUBLICAN CONTROLLED SENATE DOES THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE! I beleive this is still possible but there is still a lot to be done!

KAG! MAGA ON FRENDS! LET'S FIGHT FOR TRUMP LIKE HE FIGHTS FOR US EVERY DAY!

Comments (77)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
MakeAmericaLegendary 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think SCOTUS will give us the relief we want. The legal types I'm listening to were saying that the Texas case was the greatest gift they could have given SCOTUS if they were ever going to rule in our favor, and they spit it back in our faces.

-10
The_General_Patton -10 points ago +2 / -12

SCOTUS did us a favor. After Trump is re-instated, other States won't be able to sue other States because they don't have standing. All they have to do at this point is rule on proof of fraud. They can't simply ignore it if we bring a case with Standing -- we have 4.

4
TeslaTimeMachine 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is a stupid argument.

If a state is disregarding the constitution, then by all means should they be called out.

Let them judge the cases on their merits.

-11
The_General_Patton -11 points ago +1 / -12

No, Tenth Amendment... if you love the Constitution, that is part of it.

1
MakeAmericaLegendary 1 point ago +1 / -0

They may not ignore it, but they don't have to offer relief. And that could hurt us in other ways. They could also choose to not take the cases at all.