I agree, Trump is stronger. The absence of law becomes the abolishment of the principles of the constitutional law. OUR President Trump is NOT a dictator, and will do everything according to our wonderful constitution. We are a divided country... media, globalist and many fraudulent stupid votes have divided this country. I will agree that “WE THE PEOPLE” are no longer heard ... and dang it you may be changing my mind, yet, the founding fathers foresee this... the legal matters have yet to be exhausted .. Trump cannot legitimately fix this until the last moment... if he says go then... I’m in and prepared
If SCOTUS would have accepted and ruled in favor of Trump on the Texas case, it would have set a bad precedent.
For one, you cannot sue someone on behalf of someone else.
For two, it would have set a precedent saying states could sue each other for all kinds of reasons.
I think it's all part of the plan.
Trump's team knew there was a good chance SCOTUS would not accept it.
I think it was part of the PR play, but it was also good for the constitution in my opinion.
Maybe I am wrong and I would love for someone who actually knows what the hell is going on to correct me.
The SCOTUS is not out of play.
There are still cases making their way to SCOTUS and they will be proper cases.
Just relax and let the process play out - I am confident Trump will win this thing.
Either way, with the information pouring out, Trump is going to be President one way or the other - whether it's through the constitutional process or through Executive power.
Texas laid out a good argument why unlawful elections in other states would harm their interests. As it was a federal election and Texas falls under federal jurisdiction they were entitled to relief. Apparently in this election nobody has standing, has filed too late, has filed with the wrong court, has filed too early, etc.
If Article 2 Section 1 is not applicable and unelected or party officials can change the rules unimpeded then by what law do the courts derive their power? As Andrew Jackson said "they have made their decision, now they can enforce it." (I do not condone Jackson's reasoning or following actions).
Handshake... hold the line...
Just weary of new pedes... we don’t go until our President says so... I’m standing by ...
It doesn’t work that way... there is still a thing called the constitution... proper way to do it..
I agree, Trump is stronger. The absence of law becomes the abolishment of the principles of the constitutional law. OUR President Trump is NOT a dictator, and will do everything according to our wonderful constitution. We are a divided country... media, globalist and many fraudulent stupid votes have divided this country. I will agree that “WE THE PEOPLE” are no longer heard ... and dang it you may be changing my mind, yet, the founding fathers foresee this... the legal matters have yet to be exhausted .. Trump cannot legitimately fix this until the last moment... if he says go then... I’m in and prepared
If SCOTUS would have accepted and ruled in favor of Trump on the Texas case, it would have set a bad precedent.
For one, you cannot sue someone on behalf of someone else.
For two, it would have set a precedent saying states could sue each other for all kinds of reasons.
I think it's all part of the plan.
Trump's team knew there was a good chance SCOTUS would not accept it.
I think it was part of the PR play, but it was also good for the constitution in my opinion.
Maybe I am wrong and I would love for someone who actually knows what the hell is going on to correct me.
The SCOTUS is not out of play.
There are still cases making their way to SCOTUS and they will be proper cases.
Just relax and let the process play out - I am confident Trump will win this thing.
Either way, with the information pouring out, Trump is going to be President one way or the other - whether it's through the constitutional process or through Executive power.
Texas laid out a good argument why unlawful elections in other states would harm their interests. As it was a federal election and Texas falls under federal jurisdiction they were entitled to relief. Apparently in this election nobody has standing, has filed too late, has filed with the wrong court, has filed too early, etc.
If Article 2 Section 1 is not applicable and unelected or party officials can change the rules unimpeded then by what law do the courts derive their power? As Andrew Jackson said "they have made their decision, now they can enforce it." (I do not condone Jackson's reasoning or following actions).
SCOTUS Did Not Sell Out America. In Fact Just The Opposite! So Stop It!