You should show him the 17% of county wins (400 or so less than Obama). So, according to your friend, Trump was just REALLY hated in a few swing cities. Literally, that's what you'd need to believe.
He’s not low IQ, and he is amazing at these sorts of mental gymnastics. I’ve found that intellectual types are great at justifying anything to themselves.
Intelligence can be used to convince yourself of all sorts of possibilities. But, if you're intelligent and a moral being, you aren't afraid to look at things objectively. Any rational person cannot look at all the facts on the table and easily conclude that the election was handled fairly and accurately.
The fact that he values feelings over facts means his IQ is actually in question. Logical people follow facts over the feels. So it's clearly Dunning-Kruger effect. Acting smart is the closest thing he can achieve, which explains the mental gymnastics.
It amazes me that leftists will say there was NO fraud, while ignoring the counties and precincts that had well over 100% turn out. Turnout of over 100% is fraud.
"Math is racist". But seriously leftist are bad at math. Their brain works on "feelings" which means the logical and thusly math-understanding portion is poorly underutilized. You can't explain logic, when they "feel" they know better...
How does your friend explain Trump getting 10 million + more votes this year than 2016?
Fraud? I bet fraud, cause they always project their crimes on us.
I haven’t asked, but I assume he’d say that some people grew to like Trump but the rest hated him so much that they had high turnout.
I got mocked after showing him the impossibly high turnout in the Powell affidavits.
You should show him the 17% of county wins (400 or so less than Obama). So, according to your friend, Trump was just REALLY hated in a few swing cities. Literally, that's what you'd need to believe.
Good point, but feelings over facts for him.
He’s not low IQ, and he is amazing at these sorts of mental gymnastics. I’ve found that intellectual types are great at justifying anything to themselves.
PS: Bruno is hilarious.
Intelligence can be used to convince yourself of all sorts of possibilities. But, if you're intelligent and a moral being, you aren't afraid to look at things objectively. Any rational person cannot look at all the facts on the table and easily conclude that the election was handled fairly and accurately.
Bruno is my real name. =D
The fact that he values feelings over facts means his IQ is actually in question. Logical people follow facts over the feels. So it's clearly Dunning-Kruger effect. Acting smart is the closest thing he can achieve, which explains the mental gymnastics.
It amazes me that leftists will say there was NO fraud, while ignoring the counties and precincts that had well over 100% turn out. Turnout of over 100% is fraud.
We rarely get 65% turnout in a lot of places.
Even in Australia with mandatory voting and fines for not voting, percentage turnout never exceeds the high 80s.
"Math is racist". But seriously leftist are bad at math. Their brain works on "feelings" which means the logical and thusly math-understanding portion is poorly underutilized. You can't explain logic, when they "feel" they know better...
Always accuse your opponent of doing what you intend to do.
Rules for Radicals