197
posted ago by PatriotMan1776 +197 / -0

We have put Sidney Powell as wrong for a while now. I personally, like a lot of others, thought she was crazy. I think its time we show her some love and realize she was right so far.

A. Dominion was connected to the internet B. Dominion had connections to China and other foreign governments. C. Dominion was connected to servers across the world D. Dominion was flipping votes from Trump to Biden (Michigan Prooved this) E. She even got the rate of flipping right, saying it was 1.3 vs 0.7. Michigan showed 0.68 (68%).

We had pushed the Dominion problem to the back burner to focus on constitutionality, but seems like we are back to this.

I personally want to see the results of the Arizona audit. If they match the Michigan results, I think it would be safe to say Sidney Powell was right, and that it was wide spread vote flipping all around the country. What do you guys think? Do you still think Sidney Powell is crazy?

Comments (68)
sorted by:
62
Sporkinator 62 points ago +62 / -0

I never thought Sidney Powell was crazy in the first place, so all I have to say is, NO SHIT, SHERLOCK.

26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
4
Jeans 4 points ago +4 / -0

Concer.....since her first interview after the election I thought damn if she's right this is gonna be a brutal, long , emotional roller coaster ride. Its not like these fuckers are gonna say " yeah ya got me". I can't imagine the flack she's taking . I don't think she pulled this out of her butt, I think she is gonna be her proven right over time.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
somepepe 9 points ago +10 / -1

Came here to post that. Take your upvote.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
30
garydavis11 30 points ago +30 / -0

Sidney Powell was always correct... Now she is mentioning Trump 2018 EO...

-2
qwertyuiop123 -2 points ago +1 / -3

What Sidney was saying was some shit that was obvious to everyone (even CNN) for years. What she lied about was having evidence. And everyone here used the excuse that she refused to release her evidence because she didn't want the opposition to know what she had.

This latest lawsuit by DePerno PROVES that Sidney was full of shit. He didn't go around on media talk shows talking about sea monsters, he didn't tick tock either. The second he had the evidence he tried to release it to the public and the fucking courts had to try to stop him, no one had to try to convince him to release it.

28
FreedomFromGovt 28 points ago +28 / -0

She defended Flynn successfully against a deep state that wanted him gone (like they do Trump); against a hostile and deeply compromised judge; and, she did so after he'd already pleaded guilty. She not only successfully retracted that plea, she also got the federal prosecutors to quit. That's pretty badass, if you ask me. She's not a woman who fucks around.

-24
deleted -24 points ago +2 / -26
18
FreedomFromGovt 18 points ago +18 / -0

That's because, after all, the so-called "judge" was an Obama-appointed political brainlet with a vendetta. That wasn't Powell's fault. You gotta hand it to the left: they know how to conduct a political persecution and they're absolutely unstoppable juggernauts about it, too.

12
labiator 12 points ago +12 / -0

She isn't in a position to control an out of control partisan judge acting on zero's orders.

-5
Harper42190 -5 points ago +1 / -6

Well she wasn't exactly successful either lol

4
dfponysoldier 4 points ago +4 / -0

Judge Sullivan refused to drop the case even after he got pardoned. Took a few days to finally get dropped.

1
labiator 1 point ago +2 / -1

You're another low energy import. Where are the moderators?

3
zigmund_fraud 3 points ago +3 / -0

She was wildly successful. She managed to pull Flynn back from a guilty plea and keep him from getting additional bs charges. She fended off jackals.

19
DeborahSampson1776 19 points ago +19 / -0

I never did. She knew what was happening via very credible General McInerney. She just had to prove it. She was blocked access to the servers, some were crushed and others wiped but once the Kraken got their hands on it they knew what to look for. It's a shame she was blocked at every turn. This just made people give up instead people rallied and fought for her access.

-14
deleted -14 points ago +2 / -16
9
CmonManDemoWhat76 9 points ago +9 / -0

YES, he spoke of HAMMER & SCORECARD and it was proven, that it was in fact used. And Trump didn't have to pardon Flynn at all, he chose to for a reason. And the judge just happened to drop the case after the fact, as he would have eventually.

2
GoldenHurrdurr 2 points ago +2 / -0

After other judges said he better stop it.

-3
MAGA1775 -3 points ago +1 / -4

Where's the proof of Hammer and Scorecard?

1
CmonManDemoWhat76 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was in the report, given at the hearings. When they were showing that data packets and so forth being transmitted. Showed SCORECARD used...where have you been?

6
Tacsol5 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why wouldn't he be shill boy?

-3
MAGA1775 -3 points ago +2 / -5

He claimed that 5 soldiers were killed by Haspel's bodyguard and that Haspel was shot and transported to Gitmo. And he claimed that Trump was going to present the seized servers to SCOTUS. You believe that shit? Dude is nearly 90 years old and hasn't been in the military since the early 90s. He's a senile LARPing old coot.

2
Tacsol5 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's not the only one that claims that.

-3
MAGA1775 -3 points ago +1 / -4

Doesn't matter, you believe all that?

2
Tacsol5 2 points ago +2 / -0

From your comments you don't believe much here. Does it matter? Doomers gonna doom.

-1
MAGA1775 -1 points ago +1 / -2

I believe that Democrats stole the election with mail-in ballot fraud mostly from 6 Democrat-controlled counties. There's a reason they won't allow audits or signature checks. I don't believe in gun battles between the CIA and military or that Biden is wearing an ankle monitor.

14
Fieldmarshalmonty1 14 points ago +14 / -0

Sidney Powell is a true patriot and has been fighting for us from day one. Make no mistake😉

12
Tacsol5 12 points ago +12 / -0

I always knew she was legit. Anyone saying otherwise was either a shill or a low information clown buying into the shill narrative.

10
TruthSeeker60 10 points ago +10 / -0

Nope. She said this week she has enough evidence for a RICO case against those involved in Dominion.

6
labiator 6 points ago +6 / -0

RICO the fucking dems and super max the cunts is more my taste.

10
mandarb916 10 points ago +12 / -2

I don't think she was crazy (except maybe the Kraken comment). She's an experienced military lawyer and had gotten praise from many a folk, to the point where there were a couple of people saying she wouldn't make public statements unless she had the goods to back it up.

She also came in and essentially rescued the Flynn case.

Part of the reason she comes off as "crazy" is because the allegations are borderline "conspiracy theory"-like in nature. I mean, I think a lot of us here are still flabbergasted and to some degree in disbelief that reds have made such pervasive inroads into our society since the second red scare. And that's with folks like us following so many sources of data and information.

Now, take the perspective of a normie...all this information is a huge overload that cause serious doubts and confusions to the point they probably don't want to accept it - leading to Powell sounding crazy.

9
McPickle 9 points ago +9 / -0

True. These machines are literally smoking guns...that can talk. As long as you can analyze the code, and actually feed ballots in and getting....fractions, weighted results, etc. Also, voting machines should be low-tech. No more ability than to count and scan. There is no reason any voting machine IN THE WORLD should have the ability to "weight" results. It should not have the ability to even know what a fraction IS. The existence of those functions alone should be illegal to manufacture in a democratic voting company. These voting companies need to be sued the shit out of. By me.

A Good reporter would track down and find out who the person was that PASSED A LAW SAYING MY VOTE could be turned into a fraction.Who passed a law or broke a law to allow a voting machine in the USA to weaponize these machines by giving it the ability to "weight" results.

Someone owes me a mule and some land if I don't get an answer.

2
MocksFordComma 2 points ago +2 / -0

+1

I am a smart man but I don’t get how any of this ever got beyond, “Wouldn’t it be cool if...”

8
BigIslandFrog 8 points ago +8 / -0

NEVER thought she was crazy.

Not for a second.

6
PiggyTits 6 points ago +6 / -0

No, not crazy. Trump isn't the only one holding their cards close to their chest right now 😉

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
CornPop2024 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. Dominion and Smartmatic will not pursue libel or slander charges against Powell and others

No but I heard Smartmatic threatened to sue Faux News. 😂 Sauce

3
slag 3 points ago +3 / -0

68% was the adjudication rate. How much of those were "adjudicated" in favor of Biden is to be determined, so somewhere between 0 and 68%. Per the Cofee county video and Ron's analysis, there should be imagery of the raw ballot scans in the machines as well as results of adjudication, unless of course the version history was scrubbed. Should be interesting.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
slag 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, that's pretty damning. Also the SOS trying to wipe all the machines. Deletion of evidence is usually a win for the plaintiff, but we're in clown world so who knows.

Also the bulk "adjudication" makes perfect sense after seeing how the Coffee county video demo'd it. If you have an internet setup, you can just ship the files offsite and have them either adjudicated by hand (farmed out to a team on multiple machines) or in an automated fashion, and then transmitted back in bulk to the local machine to appear as a "local" adjudication. Just In Time fraud.

2
KEKocalypse 2 points ago +2 / -0

Say it is 30%+ for Biden. That’s like 25 million votes

0
Goozmania 0 points ago +1 / -1

Only something like 27 states use Dominion; and even then, only certain counties of many of those states do.

2
magachudd 2 points ago +2 / -0

Look at the Nevada results while you are at it.

2
KrakenWakin4JoeBacon 2 points ago +3 / -1

She’s not crazy. I’ve wondered at times why she isn’t more restrained w her words—although I think Lin Woods is even less restrained—but both Sidney & Lin obviously decided to go balls to the wall in their fight for justice. One would think that, strategically, they might want to keep a bit more to themselves... but maybe no filter is part of the strategy. I trust her, though. My gut tells me she’s genuine.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
cybertoke 2 points ago +2 / -0

where the hell have you been? no one here has doubted her for a second

1
Carter_Druse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anaconda has entered the chat ...

1
Tookens 1 point ago +1 / -0

She's been correct all along. The problem is corrupt state officials and judges.

1
Aegonthe1st 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who outside of tim pool thought she was crazy?

1
Harrison_j_bounel 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have only heard her speaking truth since I first heard her name. You sound like an inverted concern troll. Undeported!

1
GoldenHurrdurr 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think she is crazy but not bad-crazy. More like smart-crazy.

1
jackrotten 1 point ago +1 / -0

NO fucking shit? She's a top dog lawyer, she isn't going to make these claims without evidence/proof/knowledge that they are in fact true.

1
DanIsSwell 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who said Sidney Powell was wrong or crazy? We’ve been calling her Wonder Woman, The Kraken, the next AG...

1
Voiceofreason72 1 point ago +1 / -0

The machines weigh the votes. Everybody knows it's rigged. Sydney is correct

1
Margincrew 1 point ago +1 / -0

She set the bar so high and very hyperbolic that is sounded impossible. Looking highly likely now.

1
Yewki 1 point ago +1 / -0

D and E are not proven yet in my opinion, we need to look at more machines and gather more info. A judge is not going to rule on suspicions or coincidences

1
CosmoKramer 1 point ago +1 / -0

never doubted her

0
Goozmania 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nobody argued A through D... Also, your E is completely wrong. That county in Michigan had a 68% "failure rate." That has nothing to do with how many votes were expelled or flipped.