215
Comments (126)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
geebeext 0 points ago +7 / -7

Anti Q people (glowie Alex Jones Fuckface shills) always use examples from shit the Q people never said. It's just hilarious they never have a response when you confront them on the facts.

Go away sweaty ham beasts

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
1
baylig 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice summary. The kind of response I've heard is something like, "Do you know how to fight a war? I don't think so. This disinformation is intended to mislead the enemy."

Q is obviously someone with a lot of inside information. Hell, he may even be a Trump insider. But I don't remember Q posting a video of Hillary murdering a baby. That would be some shit.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
baylig 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm talking about Q apologists...twitter thots, that say things like "this is disinformation for the enemy"

1
geebeext 1 point ago +2 / -1

First coherent response I've ever come across. Kudos for that.

I could go and point out the dozens upon dozens of things Q was impossibly right about and ask you the same, which you would equally be unable to answer.

Because we don't know everything and I accept that Q's two purposes are to 1. Spread (dis)information to cause the enemy to react and 2. To keep morale of pedes up

I believe both have been done. I also believe if Trump doesn't deliver over next several weeks it was all bullshit to fuck us. Do you think that's what's going on with Trump, aka 17, aka Q+?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
geebeext 1 point ago +1 / -0

Someone had put together a Q proofs site, I'll try to find it

McCain wasn't even an example that came to mind