Interesting. I've followed Q since the beginning. I do not give him 100% faith, I remain skeptical as much as I allow myself, but yes I've seen shit like this happen with his posts to many times for it to be a lucky coincidence.
I would never espouse blind faith. Everything should be looked at skeptically. The thing is, when you view Q posts skeptically + follow up with research, it only validates the truths Q has unveiled. IMO, anyone denying Q's veracity is: 1) a sheep; 2) a shill or 3) intellectually limited.
Explain why his first post ever was blatantly false. Not a prediction...it was a statement of something that had happened and clearly never did and was a larp.
It is not intellectually limited to care about verifiable facts
Q throws disinformation out there too. It affects our side, yes, but it throws the enemy off keel. You don't want to telegram all your moves, but you want to make sure your enemy is listening. Is warfare-psyop tactic. We are in the middle just watching info war, while painful, the rewards far outweight the risks.
Q flat out stated that "disinformation is necessary". Q proofs often happen on yearly anniversaries of the posts. It is possible that HRC could be arrested on the 4 year delta of the posts, which certainly seems plausible, given the current trajectory. Lastly, Q needed posts of such an exaggerated nature to get the attention it needed.
So that is your version of research then? He gives himself a free pass to blatantly lie and you use your imagination from there?
You can believe his shit all you want, but you have no room to call skeptics "intellectually limited". Actual research means corroborating information outside the source itself.
'Q said disinfo is necessary' is the same. Exact. Copout. That I get any time I inquire about his blatant falsehoods.
I'm with you there... Making predictions in an atmosphere that's changing every second is difficult enough, so when I see true things proving I get excited.
Since you follow Q start working backwards from this 2018 post. What if Qs predictions are somehow in reverse?
Interesting. I've followed Q since the beginning. I do not give him 100% faith, I remain skeptical as much as I allow myself, but yes I've seen shit like this happen with his posts to many times for it to be a lucky coincidence.
I would never espouse blind faith. Everything should be looked at skeptically. The thing is, when you view Q posts skeptically + follow up with research, it only validates the truths Q has unveiled. IMO, anyone denying Q's veracity is: 1) a sheep; 2) a shill or 3) intellectually limited.
Explain why his first post ever was blatantly false. Not a prediction...it was a statement of something that had happened and clearly never did and was a larp.
It is not intellectually limited to care about verifiable facts
Q throws disinformation out there too. It affects our side, yes, but it throws the enemy off keel. You don't want to telegram all your moves, but you want to make sure your enemy is listening. Is warfare-psyop tactic. We are in the middle just watching info war, while painful, the rewards far outweight the risks.
What's the reward here? Stroking your own penis when something even remotely half true finally emerges out of a forest of "necessary" misinformation?
Q flat out stated that "disinformation is necessary". Q proofs often happen on yearly anniversaries of the posts. It is possible that HRC could be arrested on the 4 year delta of the posts, which certainly seems plausible, given the current trajectory. Lastly, Q needed posts of such an exaggerated nature to get the attention it needed.
So that is your version of research then? He gives himself a free pass to blatantly lie and you use your imagination from there?
You can believe his shit all you want, but you have no room to call skeptics "intellectually limited". Actual research means corroborating information outside the source itself.
'Q said disinfo is necessary' is the same. Exact. Copout. That I get any time I inquire about his blatant falsehoods.
I'm with you there... Making predictions in an atmosphere that's changing every second is difficult enough, so when I see true things proving I get excited.
Since you follow Q start working backwards from this 2018 post. What if Qs predictions are somehow in reverse?