Explain why his first post ever was blatantly false. Not a prediction...it was a statement of something that had happened and clearly never did and was a larp.
It is not intellectually limited to care about verifiable facts
Q throws disinformation out there too. It affects our side, yes, but it throws the enemy off keel. You don't want to telegram all your moves, but you want to make sure your enemy is listening. Is warfare-psyop tactic. We are in the middle just watching info war, while painful, the rewards far outweight the risks.
Seriously, the reward is a united front. A grassroot movement. People listening and starting to pay attention. Want it or not, Q has had an effect on certain amount of the population. Trying to make people think, and pay attention to the events are no easy tasks. A lot of people has been awakening due to exposure to Q. Thats the reward, the risk is some people get demoralized when certain things do not come to pass, which compared to massive gains of people listening, I believe the risk is minimal.
I think donald j trump is who makes most people wake up and listen. They only find Q when they are starved for happenings and crave more. Then they see a post like this one praise Q and go down the rabbit hole.
It's different for me I guess because I've been around 4chan my whole life, since before reddit even. Q doesn't hold a candle to the best of 4chan moments over the years.
I can't say this with any certainty but I have a strong suspicion that many people who find Q are also finding the corners of the internet like 4chan and 8kun and become infatuated with actual anon boards - then conflate the two.
Q flat out stated that "disinformation is necessary". Q proofs often happen on yearly anniversaries of the posts. It is possible that HRC could be arrested on the 4 year delta of the posts, which certainly seems plausible, given the current trajectory. Lastly, Q needed posts of such an exaggerated nature to get the attention it needed.
So that is your version of research then? He gives himself a free pass to blatantly lie and you use your imagination from there?
You can believe his shit all you want, but you have no room to call skeptics "intellectually limited". Actual research means corroborating information outside the source itself.
'Q said disinfo is necessary' is the same. Exact. Copout. That I get any time I inquire about his blatant falsehoods.
My "version of research?" You do understand how PSYOPS work, correct? "Intellectually limited" has nothing to do with intelligence. Do you know how to cauterize a brain aneurysm? No, and neither do I, because we are both "intellectually limited" by a lack of medical knowledge and training. It's the same reason why many do not understand Q - they lack the tools necessary to understand at the deeper levels. It's the same reason why I only understand about 10% of what SerialBrain2 has stated regarding the Q code.
I've spent an inordinate amount of time corroborating the information contained within Q posts, which is why I understand Q to a greater extent. How much time have you spent?
Copout - Why don't you delve into a specific Q post that can be proved/disproved through open source? I'd be more than happy to respond. You won't get any blatant falsehoods from me.
Explain why his first post ever was blatantly false. Not a prediction...it was a statement of something that had happened and clearly never did and was a larp.
It is not intellectually limited to care about verifiable facts
Q throws disinformation out there too. It affects our side, yes, but it throws the enemy off keel. You don't want to telegram all your moves, but you want to make sure your enemy is listening. Is warfare-psyop tactic. We are in the middle just watching info war, while painful, the rewards far outweight the risks.
What's the reward here? Stroking your own penis when something even remotely half true finally emerges out of a forest of "necessary" misinformation?
Yes that, penis stroking is good enough I guess.
Seriously, the reward is a united front. A grassroot movement. People listening and starting to pay attention. Want it or not, Q has had an effect on certain amount of the population. Trying to make people think, and pay attention to the events are no easy tasks. A lot of people has been awakening due to exposure to Q. Thats the reward, the risk is some people get demoralized when certain things do not come to pass, which compared to massive gains of people listening, I believe the risk is minimal.
I think donald j trump is who makes most people wake up and listen. They only find Q when they are starved for happenings and crave more. Then they see a post like this one praise Q and go down the rabbit hole.
It's different for me I guess because I've been around 4chan my whole life, since before reddit even. Q doesn't hold a candle to the best of 4chan moments over the years.
I can't say this with any certainty but I have a strong suspicion that many people who find Q are also finding the corners of the internet like 4chan and 8kun and become infatuated with actual anon boards - then conflate the two.
Q flat out stated that "disinformation is necessary". Q proofs often happen on yearly anniversaries of the posts. It is possible that HRC could be arrested on the 4 year delta of the posts, which certainly seems plausible, given the current trajectory. Lastly, Q needed posts of such an exaggerated nature to get the attention it needed.
Why?
So that is your version of research then? He gives himself a free pass to blatantly lie and you use your imagination from there?
You can believe his shit all you want, but you have no room to call skeptics "intellectually limited". Actual research means corroborating information outside the source itself.
'Q said disinfo is necessary' is the same. Exact. Copout. That I get any time I inquire about his blatant falsehoods.
Did you know when Trump needs help from him, he makes a Q shape out of masking tape on his window in Trump Tower?
The cigarette smoking man is in on it. Trust no one. ;)
Lmfao
My "version of research?" You do understand how PSYOPS work, correct? "Intellectually limited" has nothing to do with intelligence. Do you know how to cauterize a brain aneurysm? No, and neither do I, because we are both "intellectually limited" by a lack of medical knowledge and training. It's the same reason why many do not understand Q - they lack the tools necessary to understand at the deeper levels. It's the same reason why I only understand about 10% of what SerialBrain2 has stated regarding the Q code.
I've spent an inordinate amount of time corroborating the information contained within Q posts, which is why I understand Q to a greater extent. How much time have you spent?
Copout - Why don't you delve into a specific Q post that can be proved/disproved through open source? I'd be more than happy to respond. You won't get any blatant falsehoods from me.
Again, his first post. Obvious larp. Lmfao but call it a psyop if that makes you feel elite