Shapiro works within the cynical niche of "owning the libs" that his community's permit. His communities being the Jewish community and Republican Neocons. If he drifts too far either side, feedback brings him back on track. In 2016 he was a never-Trumper, in 2018 he was Pro-Trump (and a warhawk), now he's back to Never-Trumping. He does this so he can get himself on TV. Fox etc will have him on, because they know what he will say and, more importantly, they know what he will not say.
Shapiro is designed to trap people into a safe ideological holding pattern, much like Tim Pool and Joe Rogan. That's why these people are not de-platformed.
That's why Leftists talk about a "pipeline to the Alt-Right" (Alt-Right is a misnomer anyway), "pipeline to the truth" would be more accurate. Each talking-head in the "pipeline" works within their niche and they don't crossover so as not to pinch audience from each other. In effect they are preventing a massive truth cascade by locking people into their orbits. Truth-seekers will find their way though.
You are correct pede and this is why Alex Jones was effectively censored off the known net. People pumped Alex Jones on youtube to such a n-th degree that when they made it to the truth pipeline a single search on any topic had Infowars.com slapped in the top 10. Now its just a bunch of milktoast fence sitters clogging the pipes
This is the same as saying if a Chinese national was for Trump, we'd think they were awesome. However, this does not eliminate the fact that the nation composed of Chinese are a problem.
If a Chinese person supported Trump I would think they were awesome. If they were a Chinese national I wouldn't support them holding office or anything but as an individual I'd be fine with them.
If what you mean to say is "Individual Jewish people are fine but I think the state of Israel is lobbying against [X]." that would be different.
It sounds like the message here is: "Jewish people are bad/evil because they are Jewish." Which doesn't help us and isn't true.
If they were a Chinese national I wouldn't support them holding office or anything but as an individual I'd be fine with them.
Now this is interesting, did you know we're not actually allowed to know as citizens what the citizenships of our politicians are? For example, we're specifically not allowed to know how many of our elected officials are dual citizens of Israel.
And then you look over at Israel, and you see that they don't allow dual citizens in their government. They get to have a nice big juicy wall with machine guns, but Nancy Pelosi's district is a shithole. New York is a crime rampant shithole. We can't have that wall, that's racist! In fact, we need more immigrants because a nation founded for free white Europeans needs to be a melting pot (a concept born entirely of a jewish playwright named... Israel)
Sorry, but the tribe has been exposed. They've brought Weimar 2.0 upon this country and the people will respond accordingly.
Chinese people have no voice in their government, no guns and little hope. They can revolt but it's only a matter of time until they're arrested or worse. They live in the hellhole the Demoncrats want us to join. The Chinese people by and large are like us, it's the CCP that's 😈
So there's a subtle but significant difference between saying "these problems seem to be coming from this group of people" vs "these problems are because these people are evil".
For example, it's a fact that young black males commit a greatly disproportionate amount of violent crime in this country. (Approximately 6% of the population committing 50% of violent crime.) Does this mean that young blacks are evil? No. But that does not mean should also ignore it. We need to figure out what's going on.
Similarly, it's a fact that most Jews in this country support Democrats, with their particular 3% of the population funding 50% of the DNC. Are Jews evil? No. But we should not ignore the obvious because we're afraid of saying something negative about a group of people.
Jewish people tend to have a strong and often overriding sense of group interest, which for many is a primary driver of political action.
On the right this manifests as supporting wars for Israel; on the left it manifests as supporting 'Tikum Ollam,' the idea the Jews have a sacred responsibility to radically remake the world in a radically liberal direction. Both of these are supremacist beliefs; the supremacism in the second flavor is more subtle, but still very real. "God has chosen US to transform everyone else's societies"
Jewish people are generally strongly discouraged to engage in honest introspection about this. Because both of these currents serve the interests of the top power factions.
You're half correct. However it comes directly from the rabbi's themselves who are often ultra-liberal. Not all rabbi's think the same but its the concerted effort of the Jewish clergy to keep the flock from assimilation. This is why most Jews always like that oddly shaped peg that almost fits but never does.
The Clergy of the Jews also informs them of how to vote and whom to vote for as well. We are often told that "most famous jews are agnostic/atheistic" but is that the truth or are the goym "told" that truth because the Rabbi tells the flock to not let it out of the bag.
Bro, this is a Democrat/leftist thing, not a Jew thing.
If a Jewish person supported Trump I'd think they're awesome. If they didn't I'd think they're mistaken.
Hijacking comment to say:
FUCK NEOCON BEN SHAPIRO.
That is all.
True, Ben Shapiro is right about some things but I think woefully ignorant to the true scope of the fight or has some personal thing against Trump.
He’s not ignorant. He’s purposefully spinning & avoiding certain issues. He is controlled opposition at best.
I think I can make sense of all this: Benji is not always wrong but he is always a faggot.
Zionist at heart
Shapiro works within the cynical niche of "owning the libs" that his community's permit. His communities being the Jewish community and Republican Neocons. If he drifts too far either side, feedback brings him back on track. In 2016 he was a never-Trumper, in 2018 he was Pro-Trump (and a warhawk), now he's back to Never-Trumping. He does this so he can get himself on TV. Fox etc will have him on, because they know what he will say and, more importantly, they know what he will not say.
Shapiro is designed to trap people into a safe ideological holding pattern, much like Tim Pool and Joe Rogan. That's why these people are not de-platformed.
That's why Leftists talk about a "pipeline to the Alt-Right" (Alt-Right is a misnomer anyway), "pipeline to the truth" would be more accurate. Each talking-head in the "pipeline" works within their niche and they don't crossover so as not to pinch audience from each other. In effect they are preventing a massive truth cascade by locking people into their orbits. Truth-seekers will find their way though.
You are correct pede and this is why Alex Jones was effectively censored off the known net. People pumped Alex Jones on youtube to such a n-th degree that when they made it to the truth pipeline a single search on any topic had Infowars.com slapped in the top 10. Now its just a bunch of milktoast fence sitters clogging the pipes
This is the same as saying if a Chinese national was for Trump, we'd think they were awesome. However, this does not eliminate the fact that the nation composed of Chinese are a problem.
https://www.jpost.com/us-elections/us-jews-contribute-half-of-all-donations-to-the-democratic-party-468774
If a Chinese person supported Trump I would think they were awesome. If they were a Chinese national I wouldn't support them holding office or anything but as an individual I'd be fine with them.
If what you mean to say is "Individual Jewish people are fine but I think the state of Israel is lobbying against [X]." that would be different.
It sounds like the message here is: "Jewish people are bad/evil because they are Jewish." Which doesn't help us and isn't true.
Now this is interesting, did you know we're not actually allowed to know as citizens what the citizenships of our politicians are? For example, we're specifically not allowed to know how many of our elected officials are dual citizens of Israel.
Chuck Schumer gave a speech where he described his name means 'the Guardian of Israel'. Nancy Pelosi, sitting next to the Guardian of Israel I have said to people when they asked me, if this capital crumbles to the ground the one thing that would remain is our cooperation with Israel
And then you look over at Israel, and you see that they don't allow dual citizens in their government. They get to have a nice big juicy wall with machine guns, but Nancy Pelosi's district is a shithole. New York is a crime rampant shithole. We can't have that wall, that's racist! In fact, we need more immigrants because a nation founded for free white Europeans needs to be a melting pot (a concept born entirely of a jewish playwright named... Israel)
Sorry, but the tribe has been exposed. They've brought Weimar 2.0 upon this country and the people will respond accordingly.
Chinese people have no voice in their government, no guns and little hope. They can revolt but it's only a matter of time until they're arrested or worse. They live in the hellhole the Demoncrats want us to join. The Chinese people by and large are like us, it's the CCP that's 😈
China, which is a 2,000+ year old nation, has never once had elections--yet alone free and fair ones.
So there's a subtle but significant difference between saying "these problems seem to be coming from this group of people" vs "these problems are because these people are evil".
For example, it's a fact that young black males commit a greatly disproportionate amount of violent crime in this country. (Approximately 6% of the population committing 50% of violent crime.) Does this mean that young blacks are evil? No. But that does not mean should also ignore it. We need to figure out what's going on.
Similarly, it's a fact that most Jews in this country support Democrats, with their particular 3% of the population funding 50% of the DNC. Are Jews evil? No. But we should not ignore the obvious because we're afraid of saying something negative about a group of people.
Jewish people tend to have a strong and often overriding sense of group interest, which for many is a primary driver of political action.
On the right this manifests as supporting wars for Israel; on the left it manifests as supporting 'Tikum Ollam,' the idea the Jews have a sacred responsibility to radically remake the world in a radically liberal direction. Both of these are supremacist beliefs; the supremacism in the second flavor is more subtle, but still very real. "God has chosen US to transform everyone else's societies"
Jewish people are generally strongly discouraged to engage in honest introspection about this. Because both of these currents serve the interests of the top power factions.
You're half correct. However it comes directly from the rabbi's themselves who are often ultra-liberal. Not all rabbi's think the same but its the concerted effort of the Jewish clergy to keep the flock from assimilation. This is why most Jews always like that oddly shaped peg that almost fits but never does.
The Clergy of the Jews also informs them of how to vote and whom to vote for as well. We are often told that "most famous jews are agnostic/atheistic" but is that the truth or are the goym "told" that truth because the Rabbi tells the flock to not let it out of the bag.
To see who is causing trouble and strife go to their wiki and click 'early life'.
I'm willing to believe the people you say are Jewish, I just don't think the base problem is that they are Jewish.
Prager is so soft, though that works in his favor when he makes his Prager U vids.
Both of them have a very conservative Rabbi.
Prager alone qualifies as a Rabbi himself.
Just because we find some does not mean most Jews and the Rabbi's temples they visit are nests of liberal vipers.
Huh. I never knew that Mark Levin was Jewish.
Exactly. Most Jews happen to be liberal. It has nothing to do with them being whatever the idiot above was implying.