Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
Looking through, it started out as a case against Kemp against the electronic voting machines, not Dominion as it wasn’t implemented until 2019. However around pages 3-4 the complaint changes and is against Raffensperger and involves Dominiom specifically
Who is he quoting?
A Finnish computer programmer named Harri Hursti who was brought in as an exepert witness to examine the machines.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.240678/gov.uscourts.gand.240678.942.0_3.pdf
Document filed in October https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.240678/gov.uscourts.gand.240678.942.0_3.pdf
It looks like it was first filed in 2017, and has been ongoing 😳 7 pages worth
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6139924/curling-v-raffensperger/?page=7
Looking through, it started out as a case against Kemp against the electronic voting machines, not Dominion as it wasn’t implemented until 2019. However around pages 3-4 the complaint changes and is against Raffensperger and involves Dominiom specifically
Senate runoff needs to be paper
Cmon man....debunked! 🤡
(takes a shot)
Source?
Oh shoot we don't have time now before the runoff, I guess we just have to use Dominion again!