10
posted ago by Tseliteiv +11 / -1

The left will never stop calling us white supremacists. Trying to appease them by censoring discussions over white pride and tribalism rooted in the colour of our skin only plays into their game. There is nothing to be gained by it.

If you can't criticize the Jews then you actually in fact don't care about the 1A despite saying you do.

If ever the right wants to break out of the oppression of the left, the right needs to stop living the standards to left creates for you. There's nothing wrong with grouping together on race and there's nothing wrong with criticizing the Jews. That is all.

The left will never stop calling us white supremacists. Trying to appease them by censoring discussions over white pride and tribalism rooted in the colour of our skin only plays into their game. There is nothing to be gained by it. If you can't criticize the Jews then you actually in fact don't care about the 1A despite saying you do. If ever the right wants to break out of the oppression of the left, the right needs to stop living the standards to left creates for you. There's nothing wrong with grouping together on race and there's nothing wrong with criticizing the Jews. That is all.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
2
40-More-Years 2 points ago +4 / -2

Just because you’re different doesn’t mean you’re special, learn that kid. We don’t hate the Jews because there’s no reason to, and because if we did we’d have to hate Trump, someone with Jewish family and who’s been very good for the Jewish community worldwide.

Sorry we aren’t all angry retards like you

2
Tocqueville 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have little hope of affecting your point of view but I'll bite anyways...

The suffix "ist" means someone who supports, believes, promotes something. So when you support grouping people by race, that makes you racist, by definition.

Now, what's the problem with that? Well, for starter claiming humanity is split into races implies differences between those races, otherwise what would distinguish them from each other? It's then a slippery slope that leads to thinking that some races are better than others. But that's really just a cheap way to let your ignorance lose and give in to xenophobia.

You're saying it's OK to group people by race and you lump that in with "criticizing the Jews" but what makes them a race? Have you heard of Ethiopian jews? Are they of the jewish race or the black race? Speaking of Ethiopians, do you their dark skins make them the same as everyone else with dark skin? Is it all just about skin color?

The concept of race is as dumb as the idea of having many genders. It only serves to divide people and focus them on the wrong thing. In other word, divide to conquer. Which is exactly what the democrats do: opportunistically break people down into groups and finding someone to blame for their situation.

1
Tseliteiv [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are differences between races which has been proven at a biological level.

Some races are in fact better than others at certain things on average.

Why does it automatically lead to ignorance and xenophobia? Does recognizing inequality in competence in a capitalist system automatically lead to materialism and exploitation? Perhaps we ought to be communist?

The purpose of any category is to split things up into smaller parts that meet certain criteria. If you aren't allowed to split people up into groups based on something then you're suggesting everyone is equal which is false. Men and women are different biologically and this leads to different outcomes. This goes for race as well.

The only reason race seems like a divide and conquer strategy to westerners and white people is because white people refuse to band together on race. The second white people show solidarity to their fellow man simply because he's white is the second racism loses its power.

2
Tocqueville 2 points ago +2 / -0

The very concept of race in humans is arbitrary and artificial. It has no grounding in reality. It comes from back when Europeans were colonizing the rest of the planet and had to rationalize why it was OK for them to take over and rule over the locals.

Because saying: "those people are just like us but we're the bosses because we've got the good guns" was not enough. Plus it was convenient to convince the locals that they were lesser beings, makes it easier for them to accept their fate.

What defines a race in your eyes? Skin color? Jew is not a skin color.

I see nothing wrong in saying that people from certain region of the world, or ethnic group, tend to share specific physical characteristics. For example when it comes to milk allergy, or sickle cell anemia. That's not a race though, at least not the way race is thrown daily to categorize people by skin color.

There is no racial difference at a biological level because there is no biological grounding in the concept of race. Some people convince themselves that the earth is flat with arguments they find compelling. Others are convinced there are 100 different genders with similarly compelling arguments to them. And some are convinced there are different races.

I've read people claiming here that black people in the US commit more crimes by virtue of them being black. And other similar crap like that. Correlation is not causation.

I've always enjoyed watching videos of people interviewing protesters in the street is the stark difference between the lefties screaming insults and platitudes vs the conservatives who were willing to have a dialog and could express coherent thoughts.

I encourage you to do some research and learn.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
1
IntrepidBurger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Straight talk: the Middle East is a shithole will bad players on multiple fronts. To clean the mess up (and we have to because leaving them alone means more 9/11's) we have to pick a side. Israel just happens to be convenient because they're against the worst of them, Muslims.

The Israeli-Saud alliance has been explicitly for this purpose. Deal with Iran, deal with Qatar, deal with radicals in Saudi Arabia, then we can start tackling the problem of Jewish interference.

You don't fight every enemy at once, not when you can forge alliances of convenience first.

0
40-More-Years 0 points ago +3 / -3

Guess you hate Trump since his family is Jewish, and he’s the most pro-Jew president in history

1
Tunawater 1 point ago +2 / -1

USS Liberty.

-2
Tseliteiv [S] -2 points ago +2 / -4

If they are our allies then they will let us criticize them. Only an enemy tries to censor their supposed "friends" from ever criticizing their actions.

Think about your actual friends in life. You can discuss racism openly with them. Do you have friends of different races? You can discuss stereotypes and make racist jokes. No one cares. The only people who censor are your enemies. The people who aren't your friends because to them race and censorship is about power and control.

1
Liver_Kick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just like the existence of RINOs, there are JINOs. The JINOs do not worship God, but consider themselves Jews solely because of family. Just like "christians" who were born to Christian parents but only go to church on Easter and Christmas.

Just because someone identifies as a particular group, doesnt mean they actually belong in that group.

1
HumasTaint 1 point ago +2 / -1

Austrian architecture school didn't work out for you?

1
SkippyTheSwampBeast 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you mean by riggers and joggers?

-1
SMEOwner -1 points ago +1 / -2

There is no such thing as “the Jews” just as there is no such thing as “the whites” “the blacks” or “the christians”