5557
Comments (127)
sorted by:
175
BarrBQ 175 points ago +176 / -1

FACT CHECK (courtesy of CNN):

While there were some reports of errors with the scanning process in Antrim County, official sources familiar with the thinking of the voting machines tell us that the error rate was 68.05%, not 70%.

We rate this claim MOSTLY FALSE.

50
Ballind 50 points ago +50 / -0

68 was Michigan, 70 is nv

47
BarrBQ 47 points ago +47 / -0

YOU CAN'T FACT CHECK THE FACT CHECKERS!

=)

18
HillarysStrapOn 18 points ago +18 / -0

But can you toss the commie fact checkers out of the new Air Force 1? Asking for a friend

4
ModernKnight 4 points ago +4 / -0

You can't deboonk the dispooters!

3
Triclopse 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fact chess tho?

5
AppalachianTactical 5 points ago +5 / -0

both are 68 thats why Nevada says ABOUT 70.

ITS ACROSS THE BOARD .

2
Triclopse 2 points ago +2 / -0

The chess board?

2
Scumbag-reddit 2 points ago +3 / -1

Fact check: at this point what difference does it make?

1
Ballind 1 point ago +1 / -0

Two states is a much bigger deal than one state

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
BeefChucker 2 points ago +2 / -0

What if I told you it was like this everywhere. And then all at once, they stopped counting, until all the observers and challengers left.

0
NotQuiteHuman 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nice Hillary ref, my fren.

16
artman33 16 points ago +16 / -0

Haha, I like that!

7
HiddenHand 7 points ago +7 / -0

"familiar with this thinking" is some of the worst journalistic mental gymnastics I've seen in a long time...

6
SKnows 6 points ago +7 / -1

While there were some reports of errors with the scanning process in Antrim County, official sources familiar with the thinking of the voting machines tell us that the error rate was not anywhere close to 70%. In fact, it was more than 2% less than the stated number. - Edited by Chief Editor. Forces them to use their brains to try and interpret what MSM and authority figures tell them to think. Leaves them dazed and confused. Then swipes right

2
sun_wolf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Journalists are constantly thinking, “How do we deceive our readers and viewers without technically lying to them, just in case they catch us?”

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
Niburc 5 points ago +5 / -0

LOL

91
PlateOwner 91 points ago +91 / -0 (edited)

I think it was CodeMonkey who discovered there is a "dial" for scanning you can turn up or down for how often the machine must adjudicate.

If you want to "adjudicate" more for Biden, just turn the dial higher.

Adjudication is just manual vote switching.

37
ChilledCovfefe 37 points ago +37 / -0

And if a single ballot is upside down for example, the entire BATCH in the hopper goes to adjudication. Then that is where they can drag and drop ballots from one to the other or apply the ranked choice algo. These things are built to cheat.

19
Weallseethetruth 19 points ago +19 / -0

That's what Ruby was doing.. you could see every time she pulled that batch out she would turn one or two upside-down then run them back in??... Wonder if that was to force it to the adjudication to make it all look normal in a review??.... Btw .. why is that whore not in jail right now??? ... But Lin Wood is saying the governor and sos is going to jail??.... I'll start believing that when I start seeing the powers we have that are SUPPOSED to be handling this actually give a fuck about any of it!!!

66
fazzman23 66 points ago +67 / -1

when Trump wins he needs to write an EO to have voting ID and paper ballots. is a national security issue now....he has very broad powers when it comes to Nat Sec

47
ATCOF [S] 47 points ago +47 / -0

We have paper ballots, but nobody wants to hand count them. They keep recounting the scanned ballot images as a "recount".

33
Postal 33 points ago +34 / -1

We need the national guard/military to do it. Part of their duty, with the appropriate poll watchers.

6
guten_morgen 6 points ago +6 / -0

This

14
residue69 14 points ago +14 / -0

My state only has scanners mounted over a locked box. The voter places their ballot in the scanner, and if there's a problem with the ballot, it's kicked back right away. Otherwise the ballot drops into the locked box.

6
JesusWept 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is what happens in my county too. But the scanners are made by Dominion. Must be hand counted. All elections wete hand counted until the 1970s and it would still be very doable.

3
TwoStar 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the way.

1
ILearnedToCode 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, but who has access to the box? Where does it end up?

1
DonnieT 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you have more info on this? It has been impossible for me to find out how adjudicated ballots were counted during the “hand recount” in Georgia, and what paper ballot was even counted. I have some arrogant wushu washy Atlanta friends who like to yell “paper ballots were counted!” when I mention dominion. I suspected the scanned image was counted as the hand ballot, and I believe the system may be able to change the vote on the image, but I don’t have proof.

1
acasper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wisconsin did a hand recount and it came out pretty much the same. The issue there was the indefinitely confined order from the Governor and the massive amount of actual physical mail in ballots that covered likely ballot fabrication. Diversity of tactics, it’s actually a good strategy.

1
abetterreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve been curious how they handle adjudication for recounts.

18
Gesirisi 18 points ago +18 / -0

We need a constitutional amendment that create strict voting laws. Paper ballot only, ID presented, fingerprint, citizens only, automatic signature audits every single election in every single state.

9
ChilledCovfefe 9 points ago +9 / -0

And... absentee ballots only for military, nursing homes and people showing a plane ticket or business letter that they will not be in town for election day. Also, ballot must be NOTARIZED, except for military of course.

And no pre-election day voting, period. And make election day a holiday!

1
Thwok 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • Public funding to send notaries along with ALL ELECTION RELATED BUSINESS
6
Cakes4077 6 points ago +6 / -0

No same day registration either.

2
Gesirisi 2 points ago +3 / -1

And you have to re-register to vote for every election. Voter rolls are wiped clean every year.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Krauter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Regular purges of voter registrations, finger ink, holograms on ballots, ...

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
theglynn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Should that not be permanently part of the Federal election process, among other things? That is beyond EO I believe. Otherwise it is a temp fix.

2
Mozart_K231 2 points ago +3 / -1

The Supreme Court will strike it down. They struck down a Kansas voter ID law the other day.

1
RizzlieDoodad 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why not just use open source vote counters. Or allow the watchers to be armed

29
Belleoffreedom 29 points ago +29 / -0

https://newsla.localad.com/2020/12/15/it-was-systemic-purposeful-fraud-clark-county-nevada-dominion-machines-also-kicked-out-about-70-of-ballots-it-was-in-the-settings/

Antrim County, MI https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20423772-antrim-county-forensics-report

I'm getting circular cites, and cannot find the underlying article or affidavit or filing from Clark County, Nevada. If anybody has it, I would appreciate the link.

4
maganify 4 points ago +4 / -0

^^^ Get this to the top!

26
airgag 26 points ago +26 / -0

source: https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/politics-and-government/nevada/how-are-nevada-ballots-counted-and-verified-2177540/

not sure why you link a tweet with a screenshot and not the original article

2
maganify 2 points ago +5 / -3

I don't see anything about the error rate in that article

6
narvster 6 points ago +6 / -0

Read it again:

County elections officials have said about 70 percent of ballots are sent to be reviewed by elections officials.

1
bidensmissingbrain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Updoot4u.

Also note this article was posted November 6th 2020. Long before the Antrim county forensic report.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
8
Sarrwell 8 points ago +8 / -0

I believe CO is doing an audit. I know they're doing something because I used to live there and was surprised they cared enough to investigate

11
MyRigga 11 points ago +11 / -0

It's true, the article says

"All mail ballots in Clark County were counted first by running them through a digital scanner. If the scanner cannot read the ballot or determine the voter’s intent, the ballot is sent to an adjudication or duplication team, both of which are overseen by a bipartisan election board. County elections officials have said about 70 percent of ballots are sent to be reviewed by elections officials."

By "error" he doesn't mean the wrong candidate was selected, he means the machine flagged an error and sent the ballot for adjudication.

This method is perfect, it allows them to secretly switch exactly the number of ballots needed in real time while watching the statewide results, so they don't overdo it, or do too few like happened in 2016.

11
IntrepidBurger 11 points ago +11 / -0

Anyone got a link to confirmation of Nevada having the same 68% error rate? I can't find anything more than just this tweet.

8
Gmama2 8 points ago +8 / -0

I can't imagine that more than 1% of people don't know how to fill out a bubble. Remember how much the left hates standardized testing (because it tests reading, writing and math and they take class time away from teaching BS liberal indoctrination). Standardized testing teaches people how to fill out bubbles. Anyone who is under 60 has taken these tests.

If you are too freaking stupid to do this, maybe you shouldn't vote.

4
Dathurtz 4 points ago +4 / -0

In Louisiana, by the time you graduate, you have taken standardized tests in 4th, 8th, and at least 6 tests in high school. You have also taken the ACT and the WorkKeys test. You have also drilled for each of those at least 5 times.

If you can't fill out a bubble, then your vote shouldn't count.

8
13ABNRGR 8 points ago +9 / -1

At this point it doesn't seem like anybody gives a damn but us; until we start dying and killing again for our country as we once knew it.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
6
Foreign_Aid_is_Theft 6 points ago +6 / -0

What the hell is the point of a machine scanning a ballot if 70% have to be reviewed by a human? Defeats the whole purpose...unless the purpose is fraud...

6
misterLahey 6 points ago +6 / -0

TFW I realize that maybe Sherman wasn't such a monstrous war criminal after all.

2
MAGA_Flocka_Flame 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you’ve ever had to drive in Atlanta, you’d want to burn it down too…

5
SteveSanchez80 5 points ago +5 / -0

We have been using scanning technologies for 50 years -i recall tests in school with them in the 1970's. The problem now is you have crooked software. Scanners are very good at scanning the circles at high speed but you have crooked software intended to manipulate the results not report accurately.

7
GodDamnedEngineer 7 points ago +7 / -0

A HIGH SCHOOL ROBOTICS TEAM CAN BUILD MACHINES WHICH ARE FAR FAR MORE ACCURATE WITH OPEN AND TRANSPARENT SOFTWARE.

THIS SHIT IS BY DESIGN. 100 GOD DAMNED PERCENT BY DESIGN. THEY ARE HOPING THE TECHNOLOGY IS JUST TO COMPLICATED FOR THE POPULATION TO UNDERSTAND. IT MAY WORK IN SOME THIRD WORLD COUNTRY BUT NOT IN THE UNITED STATES. THIS IS NOT THAT COMPLICATED OF TECHNOLOGY. LIKE I SAID A HIGH SCHOOL ROBOTICS TEAM USES MORE COMPLICATED OPTICS.

5
Kaiheitai 5 points ago +5 / -0

Let me get this right:

The error rate is preset for touch screen voting machines. The 'errors' are then put into an adjudication folder that some anon actor then corrects?

3
I_Love_45-70_Gov 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. I watched a video last week where a woman circled in marks for two canidates on one ballot. It flagged the batch for adjudication, and then she could pull up all the flagged ballots in that batch.

She had so many options to "correct" the ballots it was crazy. In one demostration, she selected one of the filled in circles, highlighted it, then had the mark removed, showing a unfilled circle. She also showed that she could clear both marked votes, then select a third party candidate.

This access granted to local election officials....crazy cheating...

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
-9
The_General_Patton -9 points ago +2 / -11

And also huge if giant!

5
Liver-Eatin-Johnson 5 points ago +5 / -0

Rosie if O'Donnell

1
dfponysoldier 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stacy Abrams

1
Liver-Eatin-Johnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Easily confused with an M1A2 Abrams when she wears OD green moo moos.

1
LordOfTheReeeeengs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yuge gap

4
Belleoffreedom 4 points ago +4 / -0

So, excluding genuine errors, DJT got nearly 70% of the vote?

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
ATCOF [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Could just be 70% of all Trump votes and then they skimmed a few percentage points from Trump. They likely sent 70% of all 3rd party votes to Biden though.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
HiddenHand 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think it's the former. It just outputs X% of ballots as erroneous and then they routed the votes to Germany where it was adjudicated by someone over there. That's how I've interpreted the Michigan audit.

That provides plausible deniability to poll workers and reduces the number of people who have to be involved in the fraud.

1
Thwok 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • Forgive the wall-of-text, but the pieces just started to fit together in a coherent view. Call me crazy, but it's starting to make sense. Walk with me down this path, if you will ... *

Who knows what the mail-in vote ratio actually was? If you do the math, and corrupt 70% of the vote, you can change the outcome to almost any number you want. It's just a question of how many you let slip through, how many you destroy, and how many you swap.

It's not a simple equation that you can run in reverse ... it's a behavioral process with many corrupt humans involved. Arrests would force them to squeal and turn in their bosses, but the local police are compromised also, as we just learned in MI yesterday.

Basically, the poll workers had a chance to "manually correct" up to 70% of the vote, meaning they had a chance to privately override/change as many votes as they needed. It also makes sense why it takes so damned long for them to count the last few percent in each state (seems to take longer each year). It's like they are playing poker with the remote/red counties, but the blues are using blank cards and sharpie markers.

That's why counting stopped. Dominion's "undetectable" fraud couldn't deliver against the Trump landslide. Like a garden-host against a forest fire. It can sneak away with up to 5-6% (or whatever the number is) in real-time, and we'd never notice (and haven't for years). And potentially audit proof (to some extent, as long as you use THIER "audit features"). But when the blow-out is as huge as it was (Regan/Nixonian landslide proportion), you need to keep a back-stock of votes ready to corrupt in order to flip the state. But the low-level operatives weren't trained on this, as their higher-ups drank the kool-aid of the MSM polling echo-chamber.

So when they realized Dominion couldn't deliver, they had to use the left over mail-in ballots as back-up ammunition. That why they stopped counting. They over-shot and were desperate. That's why they suddenly locked everyone out. They had to change their tactics. Instead of only intervening occasionally, they started re-writing every vote (via adjudication) as the Mail-In was way more Trump than they planned, and then re-running already scanned votes, which forced them to make up voters on the fly (drastically inflating turn-out to ridiculous and unbelievable numbers). This latter part only worked if they could get the observers out.

It also explains why several states hung at "6% remaining" for days for so long, and these states used the same number (and then later 2%, etc). This systemic-behavior consistently spread across unique groupings of humans is behavior indicative of machines, not humans. Which is yet another indication of fraud (i.e. I seriously doubt the state voting population is spread in a manner that causes the exact same 6% delay), and is a spot-light on where to look. I also wonder if the military started intervening and messing with the flip-on-transmission from the county office to the state office that they where using (HAMMER?) to corrupt the remote counties. If so, this seems to be what pressured the Democrats to activate more and more back-up plans. It's almost like a few sub-steps went well so the cheaters got complacent, but then something caught them off-guard, and forcing the cheaters to take actions that were more detectible ... and prosecutable ...

Additionally, either said values are the "blow-out default" fail-safes, or it's related to the size of the land-slide proportion. I'm not saying Trump only won by 6%. I'm saying he broke their system by 6%, even with all the different forms of cheating. Makes you think that the "suitcases full of ballots" was Plan F (or Plan X).

Think about it. When pressured, NC kept saying "We know the uncounted votes are out there, we just don't know where", which is really fucked up. And then the state eventually went to Trump despite MSM's best efforts. I think they accidentally counted the Mail-In vote too fast, and didn't leave enough uncounted votes to "adjudicate" and flip (to cancel any late-arriving ballots from remote districts).

PA probably made that same mistake, but Wolfe made some huge public promises, so his ass is seriously on the line. He was forced to do whatever he had to to claw it back ... which is where the injection of 1million fake mail-in ballots comes in. They didn't stop counting soon enough and couldn't un-count, so he had to dump more in to bring Biden up.

The problem is, as they moved from Plan A, to B, to C, to D ... each time they stepped down on the list, they used riskier and riskier forms of corruption which are easier and easier to detect and catch. And utilized more and more of the Swamp's resources, tainting/identifying a greater and greater percentage of those that must be "purged".

... almost like it was a coordinated maneuver to drain said Swamp ...

2
BornFree1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Obviously they planned for fall out, just in case, because conveniently all error ballots went to certain places, then got mixed with everything else. So therefore neither the mail in error ballots plus whatever ballots present at the adjudication places can truly be verified because its all mixed.

5
BecauseISaidSo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Means 70% went to manual adjudication by an "election official"... That official could choose how ballots voted, individually or as a bulk batch.

We can't be sure without hand recounts and audit how many of these 70% were Trump votes. But we do know that all the fraud went in Biden's favor.

3
nvpatriot2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

70% is just about the same amount of NV residents who are more than a little pissed...

3
Paulylamma 3 points ago +3 / -0

When I was watching the Clark county election office for the Republicans at night I saw the election workers start to arrive at 5:20 am, and the last of them leave between 11:15 and 11:30 pm. The Republican observers were only allowed in from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm. They spent 14 hours a day unobserved everyday with the cops protecting them. On the last night I was out there fox 5 news came out and set up around 10pm. The cameraman told me they were in there counting, and they have a total in the morning. The whole thing was rigged here in Las Vegas.

2
sun_wolf 2 points ago +2 / -0

The whole thing was like a mafia coup.

3
Mozart_K231 3 points ago +3 / -0

We’ve known the issues; we may not have known the percentages. Nothing is done to prosecute anyone. They certified yesterday. I know that’s not the end all but it is a sign of not giving a shit about election fraud.

I don’t want this shit rolling into January. We all know the issues. It can only be sorted out through the executive branch at this point. They only have one way to sort it out. That’s the Insurrection Act. The president needs to use it soon or the country is done.

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

At this point it seems to me like the United States Military is the only organization who has the authority and credibility to tell the American People what is going on.

After that, CNN could question or deny the conclusions of the United States Military, but that would force their viewers to choose who they trust more: the United States Military or an international media conglomerate like CNN. If CNN goes to the EU or UN Police, that also forces the American People to choose who they are loyal to: the U.S. Military or the EU/UN Police. And I think the majority of Americans would still pledge their allegiance to the United States Military before they would a foreign conglomerate or international unelected bureaucratic police force.

3
tragician 3 points ago +3 / -0

VIRGINIA MAINE EVERYWHERE . ILLINOIS ALL OF IT. BURN IT ALL

2
Hoshi 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you have to check 70% of the ballots anyway, why is there not justification to not just handcount and save money?

2
Skippy737 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean wtf Error rate is supposed to eb 1/250,000 so wtf are “about 70%” in clark county and 68% in anterim county being adjudicated? I thought ron . Codemonkey z said adjudicated ballots have an audit trail?

1
droden 1 point ago +1 / -0

does this mean 70% of people are retarded and cant fill out a ballot, they poll workers are retarded and cant operate the machines or the machines are designed to kick out ballots so there is adjudication?

2
Jeans 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well its Clark County so I'd say all three. I live here and can attest that every manner of fraud went on including 100k proven fraudulent votes. 42k voted twice 16k voted here and in another state, 15k non residents voted 4k illegal immigrants voted 2k felons voted ECT. Ballots were stolen, sold and destroyed. USPS workers sold ballots, activists harvested ballots at nursing homes and adult disability centers, the election committee would not scrub the rolls and carelessly sent out ballots ( everyone in NV was mailed a ballot ) to 225k voters whose primary ballot had been returned as undeliverable that summer. They knew what they were doing, they wanted hundreds of thousands of ballots floating around,its little wonder people came unto my apartment building complex and stole the ballots that had been left for the mailman as undeliverable. Hell I got three ballots and the two I received besides my own were for people who hadn't lived here in decades. Don't let anyone tell you Nevada had a clean election , Hell we have to do a run off for a local election because they don't trust the vote. Total shit show.

1
sun_wolf 1 point ago +1 / -0

It means they are cheating. There was no election.

1
AppalachianTactical 1 point ago +1 / -0

So they both had 68.05% what are the odds. I mean I assume about 70% is actually 68.05.

1
Staatssicherheit 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder if Dominion "suggests" an answer and clerks just clicks whatever the machine suggested. If 70% of the ballots aren't going through automatically, it would really be no different than a hand count to go through all of them.

1
repoman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here we had polling stations deliberately switch out pens for sharpies. I bet the adjudication rate is at least that high.

1
BornFree1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

So they are saying 68 percent of all mail in ballots were sent for adjudication? But how? in a truck? or just the images? Why the fuck even scan them first place, just send them all to the county officials to begin with. So they are saying the scanner could only verify 32 percent of the vote. So they sent the bad ones to another location where they verified the other 68 percent, as Michigan had almost zero rejection. And now since they are mixed in with everything else from all precincts there is no way to audit them correct? In what way did the election board oversee anything? They did not. They had no protocols in place. And when asked to look at it, they said they do not even have the power to review it. What a great system, its not reviewable 68 percent of the vote can not be reviewed even if they wanted. correct? Really there is no way to see if a ballot was just made up or not by looking at the physical results, or electronic really. How convenient. This level of stupidity is not tolerated anywhere, and if you were being financial audited they would disregard your numbers all together and make up their own numbers via estimation and you would heavily fined or in jail. It is no different than money laundering, its ballot laundering, clear as day. Why is this permitted under any circumstance. or am I looking at it wrong?

1
Litehouse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does anyone know if the machines can be forensically audited now that early voting has started for the senate race?

1
Niburc 1 point ago +1 / -0

This article notes that Arizona had 200,000 digitally adjudicated ballots out of 1.9 million early ballots and absentee ballots- not 70%, but still highly questionable.

https://www.sgtreport.com/2020/12/breaking-exclusive-an-audit-of-digitally-adjudicated-ballots-would-easily-place-georgia-arizona-wisconsin-and-probably-michigan-in-the-trump-column/

1
SteveSanchez80 1 point ago +1 / -0

The head of Fulton county said the adjudicated 94% of the ballots! 94%, that is basically every ballot was not elected, but selected. It is a worthless election in this county and Ratberger and Kemp are both criminals and should be executed by dipping them in gasoline and tossing a match.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Georgians need to keep putting pressure on their local party. Set a condition that none of this will vote in the upcoming elections if they dont stand up against this.

1
Sheprecon31 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck me wtf is this Zimbabwe people need to swing folks to stop this happening again sad to say but it has to

1
LtPatterson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is the Dominion CEO a free man?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Dingmann01 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can someone post a link to the actual report? Struggling to locate

1
GravityBounce1976 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did the results change at all?

2
13ABNRGR 2 points ago +2 / -0

This isnt going to change the results. What they are saying is there were 30% of ballots sent through normal counting and 70% through adjudicated counting. Through the adjudicating process the worker is able to change the votes. Without the actual ballots in hand it would be hard to know how many were switched from Trump to Biden. In the Antrim Cnty MI audit, the logs of all these changes and who was conducting them in the adjudication process was erased.

1
SteveSanchez80 1 point ago +1 / -0

and in georgia, they have already sent the extra ballots and servers to shredders.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
goldbarr 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s not “errors” if someone was changing the votes through a malware back door.

1
Beundra 1 point ago +1 / -0

I read this tweet here today:

https://twitter.com/ScottPPeriod/status/1338729320399814657

Is this true? Is there any evidence that they were poperly recounted?

1
SteveSanchez80 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure, they were counted "properly" by the "unbiased" poll workers, you know the ones with blonde dreadlocks, black "VOTE" facemasks and black BLM T-Shirts on. Nothing to see here, go away.

1
Xuvial 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't believe that 24 states use these rigged machines. How the hell did this happen? How did anyone agree to it? It shows how deep the CCP has rooted itself in USA. They must be destroyed.

1
SteveSanchez80 1 point ago +1 / -0

I actually worked on these at a local polling place in suburban Shitcago. The actual voting system is VERY nice. It has very nice hardware and the software does a very nice job for what it does. If it were not designed for corrupt fuckery by corrupt poll workers, it is a very nicely designed system in just about every respect. The problem is the corrupt people in charge can completely mess with the results. At the local level, I supported 4 polling precincts and they are not connected to the internet during the day, just to send the final results from the scanning tabulator. At a central office, like the one in Atlanta, Detroit, Filthadelphia, they have a lot more control than you do in branch locations as we could not do anything besides scan in the ballot more than once if we wanted to, but if our ballot books did not match up with the total scans we would be in trouble. Like I said, low level poll worker is what I was, but the equipment and system to vote is actually very nice and we used Dominion.

1
Spinnumb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kemp is in on the corruption. He has no intention of exposing himself.

1
logic1010 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who are these people?

1
johnqpublic864 1 point ago +1 / -0

Less than 1% death rate for Kung Flu = nearly a year of bullshit (and still going).

~68% "errors" on Dominion voting machines = There's no evidence of widespread voter fraud. Free and fair election. Drumpf should concede and stop his attack on democracy.

1
Robertkolodin 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're going to find as they're forced to audit all the machines in every Democratic stronghold the same problem. 65 - 70% error rates

1
1Crabbyoldfucker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hell I've found 100% percent error rate in the heads of Democrats.

1
scionkia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Folks - any sauce to the NV 70% adjudication rate?

A picture in a tweet from an unknown person doesn't cut it for me. Where are they taking that picture 'from'?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0