Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
No elected official in good conscious (on either side of the isle) can accept these results. Mike Pence and anyone else involved need to fix this before we loose everything and descend into a hot war.
exaclty, they set the machines so the democratcs running the adjudication can literally computer alter every damn ballot. and accept ballots regardless of signatures, etc
I agree, they went for broke trying to get rid of our President, but they forgot about us. We didn’t shrug our shoulders and say “oh well we lost...cope.” We said nope because we had someone finally in office that did us proud.
So entirely dependent on who was running adjudication and if there was any oversight. They can basically flip as many ballots as they want.
It sticks out in my mind from the Michigan hearing one lady said their biggest bottle-neck was adjudication. This particular lady wasn't even alleging fraud but said the adjudication process was broken. To me this says there was a high error rate in Detroit as well. What good are machines that require 70% of the ballots be manually 'interpreted' by a person, sometimes without honorable oversight.
Adjudication of a vote is essentially casting a vote.
So 70% of votes were cast by poll workers.
The purposeful deletion of adjudication logs, sharing of superuser credentials between poll workers, and illegal software updates without re-certification before and after the election were all practices to foil or spoil forensic reconstruction.
Sure. With deleted adjudication logs and 70% of the vote in the personal whims of poll workers, the ridiculous anomalies seen in the blue districts that kicked out republicans but kept working are a very clear sign of what happened.
Were republicans scrutinizing the 70% of ballots that were adjudicated in dem precincts? As in, directly involved in looking at the ballots and casting the vote through adjudication?
Or was there a bipartisan board but hundreds of poll workers with dem poll workers in blue cities essentially casting hundreds of thousands of votes through the adjudication loophole?
Sauce:
https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/politics-and-government/nevada/how-are-nevada-ballots-counted-and-verified-2177540/
I love how Twitter flags is as a disputed claim about election fraud, when all the post presents are FACTS about the error rates. 😒
No elected official in good conscious (on either side of the isle) can accept these results. Mike Pence and anyone else involved need to fix this before we loose everything and descend into a hot war.
So now we know what percent of the vote Trump actually got, 68 to 70%
exaclty, they set the machines so the democratcs running the adjudication can literally computer alter every damn ballot. and accept ballots regardless of signatures, etc
The trumpy trump is gonna rain hell down hahaha
Reality is disputed.
WOW...
God damn the true landslide must have been historic.
I agree, they went for broke trying to get rid of our President, but they forgot about us. We didn’t shrug our shoulders and say “oh well we lost...cope.” We said nope because we had someone finally in office that did us proud.
So entirely dependent on who was running adjudication and if there was any oversight. They can basically flip as many ballots as they want.
It sticks out in my mind from the Michigan hearing one lady said their biggest bottle-neck was adjudication. This particular lady wasn't even alleging fraud but said the adjudication process was broken. To me this says there was a high error rate in Detroit as well. What good are machines that require 70% of the ballots be manually 'interpreted' by a person, sometimes without honorable oversight.
Adjudication of a vote is essentially casting a vote.
So 70% of votes were cast by poll workers.
The purposeful deletion of adjudication logs, sharing of superuser credentials between poll workers, and illegal software updates without re-certification before and after the election were all practices to foil or spoil forensic reconstruction.
I meant that the percentage of votes that went to the wrong candidate is dependent on how crooked the adjudicator was.
Sure. With deleted adjudication logs and 70% of the vote in the personal whims of poll workers, the ridiculous anomalies seen in the blue districts that kicked out republicans but kept working are a very clear sign of what happened.
Remember that video of the lady showing the adjudication process? How she could basically do anything she wanted to the ballots?
“Overseen by a bipartisan election board”
What does overseen mean.
Were republicans scrutinizing the 70% of ballots that were adjudicated in dem precincts? As in, directly involved in looking at the ballots and casting the vote through adjudication?
Or was there a bipartisan board but hundreds of poll workers with dem poll workers in blue cities essentially casting hundreds of thousands of votes through the adjudication loophole?
That’s legal speak for we’re covering our asses