This is the fundamental question for me too. If there are paper ballots and paper printouts, then the final counts from the machine using this fraudulent algorithm need to match those paper artifacts in the event of a recount or audit. So when the machine shifts votes from candidate to candidate in specific ratios in the majestic manner described, somewhere at the end someone needs to physically inject and remove ballots so everything balances. Is that what we're alleging here?
I'm even okay with paper ballots not matching. There are ways around that if you have access to the ballot storing room.
But Solomon never seems to clearly state the top level accusation. I understand he claims to witness many districts reporting results floored to the ratio of a specific wheel branch (based on total votes and a wheel divided into 2500 parts or so)... but he never seems to explain what this does at the top level.
The lack of a straightforward explanation of the overall system makes me discount it all.
This is the fundamental question for me too. If there are paper ballots and paper printouts, then the final counts from the machine using this fraudulent algorithm need to match those paper artifacts in the event of a recount or audit. So when the machine shifts votes from candidate to candidate in specific ratios in the majestic manner described, somewhere at the end someone needs to physically inject and remove ballots so everything balances. Is that what we're alleging here?
I'm even okay with paper ballots not matching. There are ways around that if you have access to the ballot storing room.
But Solomon never seems to clearly state the top level accusation. I understand he claims to witness many districts reporting results floored to the ratio of a specific wheel branch (based on total votes and a wheel divided into 2500 parts or so)... but he never seems to explain what this does at the top level.
The lack of a straightforward explanation of the overall system makes me discount it all.