1 in 250,000 is within the acceptable error rate. That is .004%. 1 divided by 250000 = .000004 X 100 = .0004%
2 in 250,000 is .008%, which, as I'm rereading this thing, might be the upward limit of acceptable. So 2 in 250k is ok, but any more than that is unacceptable.
You know, I can't even find the actual guideline they are referencing. So either they are wrong in the tweet about the 1 in 250k, or they are wrong about the percent of .0008%.
Whatever. It's a very small number in either case.
no, when it hits 1 in 249.999 it's beyond allowable error rate
1 in 250,000 is within the acceptable error rate. That is .004%. 1 divided by 250000 = .000004 X 100 = .0004%
2 in 250,000 is .008%, which, as I'm rereading this thing, might be the upward limit of acceptable. So 2 in 250k is ok, but any more than that is unacceptable.
In either case. A very small number.
when you have 1 in 249.999 you're already over the limit.
You know, I can't even find the actual guideline they are referencing. So either they are wrong in the tweet about the 1 in 250k, or they are wrong about the percent of .0008%.
Whatever. It's a very small number in either case.
yeah one of those is wrong.
1 vote too many isn't 2/250k, yes that's also too many, but far too many.
1 vote too many is 1/249.999, that's exactly 1 vote too many, which is 1 vote over 0.0004% which is 0.0004000016000064%
So it's simply 0.0004% max allowed, no need to make it 0.0008%, that number is just wrong, unless the 250k is wrong like you said.