Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
Depending on their loyalties it may not be 'fall for', but 'fall back on'. If the media provides cover for them then they have no reason not to. But if they do that then they have thousands of patriots for constituents and who knows when tarring and feathering might make a comeback
This committee doesn't really care, this is all a show, ... the Legislator in MI is blind, and they like it that way. We here in MI try to elect new officials all the time, but as soon as they meet with these other officials they are indoctrinated into this blind club and taught to just collect a paycheck.
I don't know how they could be worse than those in New Orleans but I don't doubt they're equally bad. There are potholes in New Orleans notorious for swallowing small vehicles. Maybe why a great many of us drive full size trucks.
Same out here in Philly. I've lost everything(job, apt, savings) to the bullshit policies they've enacted this year. I've got two weeks left before I end up without a roof over my head or a bed to sleep on. If my city doesn't open up and FAST, i'm gonna be a pissed off pede on the governor's lawn until I'm allowed to go back to work.
Don't know how to get out, i'm feeding myself out of my change jar right now. I can't afford a local bus out of here let alone get the little bit of shit that matters out of here.
There were so many lies in his opening statement, I literally lost count. From the Smartmatic denials to not connected to Internet, it was just one after another.
Depends on your definition of “ballot”. They were able to view the optical PDF (sometimes other file formats) of the ballot. The paper ballot stuff I have no clue on, didn’t do anything regarding the paper ballots.
The committee wants to believe Dominion. You can tell.
Dominion is credibly accused of fraud, error and the fucking RINO cucks believe the company. Calling all pedes in MI, WI, PA, AZ, NM, GA, we cannot let up in these swing states. This is a battle of will and we cannot allow the fake news, the establishment cronies demoralize us in this most glorious of fights. This is the republic. We are either a nation of laws or we are not.
He really needs to double check because he said that it's impossible to enable RCV on those systems. Real easy to verify that claim.
My guess is that he doesn't know that it's able to be enabled. He doesn't even know the programming language. Software like this usually has all bells and whistles available but they are just disabled. Usually contractors can come in and secretly enable the bells and whistles for the client.
I think he's making a lot of claims that will put him in big trouble. He's probably getting on a plane tonight to Argentina.
He might have been dancing around it. He said that RCV could not have been used because the ballots were not RCV. Maybe he meant that it's unlikely that RCV was used if the ballots didn't have RCV on it.
He doesn't seem to know a lot about the capabilities of the software. He is having a hard time speaking about connectivity to the internet. It sounds like he's stupid, but I imagine he's just using scripted lines, and he's trying to reconcile the lies with the technical information.
Again, really easy to just turn on remote adjudication if it's available on other systems. They don't erase unlicensed products from the machines, they just disable them. If they "forgot" to disable those products, then they will be available for use. And they can blame the low level employees for the "mistake".
Finally going to get this rat under oath. Expect LOTS of lying. Give him all the rope necessary to hang himself. Next week with the Maricopa county results, he'll be cooked.
Executive Order is especially about stuff this guy is the front man for. He won't escape. The DS is not going to save him. They are overexposed right now.
I'm pretty sure they'll be able to ask him some questions. You don't threaten a subpoena for him to just pull out powerpoint, and scurry off afterwards.
Several dumbass articles have said:
"There is no way to manipulate the vote outside of adjudication, and thus the election was safe" ignoring the 68% error ratio and the completely wiped adjudication logs.
They really think we're stupid.
Then this idiot went and said "there is no way to turn on ranked choice voting, despite the audit clearly showing that not only was it ON, but there were only two options that WEREN'T on. Mans is a bold liar.
He defers most of the fraud to Democrats and election officials. For example he flat out states that Dominion doesn't care where the ballots come from, they can be completely fake, but Dominion machines will still count them anyways.
This shit pisses me off beyond believe. These fucking hearings are always a god damn joke.
We've got people asking questions that they don't understand, about technology they don't understand, scripted by people who they don't understand, being answered by a dude who understands and can ring around the rosie the fucking answers.
Is there some fucking horseshit law that prevents people that know what the fuck they're talking about to be involved with this shit?
We've got people asking questions that they don't understand, about technology they don't understand, scripted by people who they don't understand, being answered by a dude who understands and can ring around the rosie the fucking answers.
Yep. This is the problem with politicians everywhere.
Exactly how I feel every time. Especially as a person who has an extensive background in the IT field, I also want to scream that them. I wish I could some how help at these hearings.
A lot of the what the Dominion representative is saying is the same as what I've said as a specialist in systems like this.
If you do things properly it's pretty hard to cheat with the machines because you can always compare to the paper ballots. There are basically techniques where you do not have to do so exhaustively.
Personally I'm sceptical of Dominion as a large direct cause of fraud in miscounting but there are enormous caveats.
He's saying it should be easy to check. Absolutely. But all of that is theory. Have all materials actually been preserved securely and have all results been tested in this way? The answer to that is no. Otherwise that evidence would have been presented in defence of suits long ago.
I can tell you if I had a Dominion insider and I asked them how to cheat they would say don't do it the way people are suggesting it might be most easily done or it will be detected.
In that case either you do it a different way or you ask how it would be detected then target that. You may simply hope to delay detection enough for it to be deemed too late.
Dominion isn't an attack vector in the way people think it is. Just the insider knowledge or access can be pretty dangerous and that is one of many possible attack vectors.
Their representative is making some bold statements that he cannot know. Overly defensive of the product and that it's never to blame or involved. Even if he knows nothing of foul play from his end it's certainly possible for operators to abuse the machines. For him to state that this has never happened is not something we can actually know and investigations suggest that it has happened.
The whole pipeline needs to be investigated but the Dominion representative dropped the hint himself. The best place for fraud is upstream.
It was certainly a tool to cheat, but I think too many hands were using the tool and it got too sloppy, which is how it got detected. I think you are correct in the clock running out for discovering it, but I think there is enough found (thanks to the sloppiness) that there is time.
I cannot listen to him because I'm exhausted from all the BS. Thanks for the run down.
I have no doubt that actors will have cheated all over the place in many ways. Regardless of what I think the odds are of what it's irrelevant, you run the match and see what the result is. The argument that they would have avoided cheating that way because it's easily detectable isn't sufficient excuse to then not try to detect it, after all it's easy right? If it turns out not to be easy then you have a big problem.
The Dominion thing is a bit of a distraction from areas of fraud where it was more likely but is inherently harder to detect. As well as other activities that basically amount to the same damage as fraud even if you might term them or describe their mechanism differently.
A lot of the fraud is likely to be ineligible voting and unequal protection (illegals, multiple voting, stealing identities, under age, sending out ballots to everyone, making it easier for one type of voter, disappearing ballots, etc).
For stuff harder to detect like that requires a more extensive audit and in passing you'll pick up what's easy to detect or when it's hard to detect for example due to missing hard copies.
There are more extensive means of fraud possible with Dominion if there is extensive systems integration. That means for example if they can back fill, hard copies for example, voter registration database, etc. Usually that would involve not only Dominion.
To rule that out you would need a forensics team with people like me going in to actually look at it. There's only so much you can gleam from speculation. If the Dominion representative believes they can wash their hands clean of any responsibility and have nothing to worry about then they should welcome this.
Dominion hardware and software is built from the ground up to facilitate election tampering. Why does it have an algorithm, the weighted election feature built into the software? Why is it so easy to delete votes? Why is it so easily to make changes with a damn USB? Why was there significant effort in the software to hide changes to vote totals? Every one of these features is included in order to facilitate cheating. These were selling points to the crooked politicians who decided to buy DVS in the first place. There's a reason Texas refused DVS 3 TIMES - crappy security, crappy software.
The freaking company name is FLAUNTING it in our faces. Dominion. These low life politicians used our tax $$ to buy voting equipment that is garbage and they chose it to perpetuate their control over us. It facilitated election fraud on a scale that is historic. 68% error rate with no history of how those ballots were adjudicated?
These machines should be confiscated from around the country and smashed to bits. Back to hand counting with observers at every step of the way until we can agree on some alternative that is bulletproof against fraud.
This testifying in Congress means nothing to me. It's just theater.
I've built systems like Dominion before, self service machines and betting machines. It's really easy to cheat but hard to do so undetectable.
If the handling of the ballots is set up right and the election run properly it wont matter how insecure the machines are.
They are already in trouble as from what I've seen Dominion fails on a lot of standards which in itself is a scandal. It's not easy to understand why when you seen how strongly for example their CEO comes to the defence of the product. Their quality control process heavily relies on marketing alone.
The notion that they don't get involved in how people run their elections might work in corrupt countries but they do not seem to understand what it means to operate in a country that actually intends to properly conduct elections. This is a common failure in business. To assume if something works once then stick to that across all markets.
When it comes down to it all that matters is the science. Not the speculators. They should be welcoming and even demanding a full audit themselves. In fact what they are talking about, comparing to a hand count should happen every time as a matter of procedure and we should already have full evidence of this available. No system is perfect, it's impossible, you must always verify it as standard.
It is theatre or just theory. There's no good the CEO rattling on about all the science that's possible yet nothing is being done to do all the science possible.
What I’m curious about is whether the machines have the ability to change the vote mark on the scanned ballot image during adjudication. Seems like they can but I don’t have confirmation.
That's a good question. I recently watched a vid where they were demonstrating the adjudication process, but they didn't really address whether or not the image file was altered. What they did demonstrate is that not only can the adjudicator fix the 'mistake', they can also change every other thing on the ballot to whatever they want. The changes should get recorded - audit trail - but we have deleted audit trails, don't we?
Also, on that note I have been mulling over for a couple weeks what actually happened during the georgia “hand count”. Were the scanned images considered the physical ballots? What happened to the original physical ballots of those that had “errors” and were adjudicated? If they were replaced with images that could have been altered, I think we have our source of the dominion related fraud. I don’t see hardly anyone talking about these questions.
We need robust systems that have election security as part of the design basis, not built in options to cheat. Take a look at PCI DSS protocols that were developed for cc transactions and bank transactions over the web. Not everything in PCI DSS applies to election system security, but it's a start.
That's where you need a detailed analysis. If you're not careful in the wrong hands all the processes for flagging anything wrong or fixing things can be used as quality control to make sure they cheat effectively as well as identifying for them first what didn't go through so to dispose of it.
I agree that no system is perfect. Even hand counting with observers at every step of the way cheating can still occur. It's the human factor. But I'm not talking about the human factor. I'm talking about the manufacturer's DVS equipment being designed to facilitate election fraud.
Consider these two features:
Weighted election option is built-in. All DVS infrastructure has it.
Dominion software manipulates the audit trail to hide evidence of vote manipulations.
The excuse that Dominion gives for the weighted election feature being on their machines is 'it's there for our condominium customers'. That's total BS and really pisses me off. The value of just one state buying DVS is on the order of a 100 million dollars times multiple states. The software could absolutely be customized to remove weighted election feature - and it should have - no excuse. Whatever sales person said that should be bitch-slapped.
Here's another reason I don't buy the 'it's in there for our condo customers' excuse. Here in Massachusetts, the DVS machines have the feature of recording ballot images disabled in the software. DVS did that per this state's request even though it is possibly a violation of federal election law for record retention. So, DVS absolutely CAN make a change to software to make a sale, but yet they don't remove the weighted election option in the product line sold to state governments? IMO, that is an untenable position.
The existence of #2 has no possible justification. It's sole purpose for existence is to hide the fact that cheating occurred. In the last 2 weeks, 2 different sources I looked at say Dominion software does this.
From a software engineering background including systems like this, in practice, not theory, I'm not particularly alarmed by that feature in and of itself. In terms of software it's infinitely compromised by the software engineers alone and I'm not sure you may understand what's possible. It's possible to weight votes how you like without an obvious feature like this.
However shipping builds with features like that available to an operator on the front end in a crucial race is something they should have really addressed long ago. The impression I get is that the software is cluttered with inappropriate feature creep that ends up in the hands of the end user when it's something they absolutely do not need nor should have.
I would personally ship the feature and then have it as a honeypot but I'm just evil like that. You click the button, the machine goes mental, alarms good off, it starts waving it's servos, jams up and screaming that it's being molested to anyone in the proximity like one of those car alarms printing out and flashing to call the company.
That's most likely money laundering if true. Happens all the time. That's way over priced. Procurement scam. If they're paying so much more than necessary it's automatically not even suspect. You know they're embezzling.
There are much worse ways they can weight votes in secret which is inherent to a software solution.
There are a lot of things wrong with Dominion on multiple levels which make it a bad choice but what we need to do is search for real definitive problems.
I disagree. Pedigree traces back to Venezuela. Designed to steal elections, not for honest elections. Front for SmartMatic. You're not changing my mind, so EOS.
They're heavily tied to corrupt nations operating both in delivering services and in sourcing services themselves. The impression I get is that they have a policy of turning a blind eye because that can get you in trouble in providing services in these kinds of countries.
If you're going to say designed to steal elections it doesn't really mean anything beyond personal opinion if you can't explain how. I take the approach of what might be sufficient to actually press charges. That requires looking into things much more deeply.
It looks like me that their entire business culture is designed to relinquish culpability but outside of that they don't care. If you snoop around into things or put your nose where it doesn't belong in the countries they operate it gets cut off. They almost say as much explicitly. I suspect you'll find their system is designed in such a way to offload blame and that's the limit.
What's you're looking for is not likely entirely all design. It's an evolution from a system of perpetual neglect.
Their customers are often questionable states. Their motto is we don't care how you run your elections. You're basically paying for someone to help provide election systems who didn't see nothing in the event of foul play.
It’s a fucking adding machine. You can count votes with an 🧮 abacus. Why in the hell would any state pay $100M for this POS software? Must be all those “features” that you would only need if your preferred candidate was way behind on election night.
Nevermind, I see it might be a subset of that feature. If that's the case then the guy outright lied. Nothing stops someone from turning it on. In fact they should have asked him that. The paper ballots thing makes no sense, that has nothing to do with it unless it is hardcoded in a barcode or something, which I doubt it is.
At the time everyone was looking for him, I made the point that Osama could have walked onto almost any military base in the world if he had the right ID and followed local protocol. Even more chance if he did so at peak morning time.
And all these counties with your machines have the same problem. The political party that all votes switched too is also heavily invested in your company. Crazy coincidences
Right. All they need is a bar or qr code to stop that. Basically it is a very exploitable system that overlooks major attack vectors in the name of 'the workers should be 100% honest' which is never true and why you would want a 'secure' system in the first place. Basically admitting that his product fills no need.
This is a big piece - for wayne county where 70% of the poll books were off. This guy seems to confirm this was done(multiple scanning of ballots). Curious how far off those poll books were.
They will run on that when everything else fails. In fact I predict that they will strike a deal later to admit and support everything in exchange of "we were hacked, we didn't know, it was all locals and foreign power"
We will claim they didn't know. They will claim they didnt run it. They will claims "they thought" it is not possible and they will claim it was hacked. "We just sell the machines" line
They don't just sell machines. They sell the code for them, too - the code that does the actual fraud/tampering.
He's trying to pull a "plausible deniability" defense, but it's not going to work out for him. If his employees crafted code that could steal elections, and he's unaware of it, tough shit. You're CEO, your literal job is to not let that shit happen.
Well not only that, he said there was no digital adjudication in Antrim and ranked choice voting wasn't enabled, despite the audit proving both of these wrong.
And the news will repeat tonight "it's been debunked" realizing they are only using his words and they know the general public will eat it up and not think further past their flimsy explanation.
I have a legitimate question, why the fuck are we using a Canadian voting system? Yeah, chinese, commie, etc, but why a Canadian? Hell, Canadian tv shows suck compared to American ones, and ours are garbage
wtf is this supposed to prove:
Q: Did your company commit fraud ?
A: No we would never
Everybody: See no evidence stupid drumpf trying to steal the election
From what I'm hearing, and all that is needed to be heard from the opening statement, is that they are going to blame election officials for any chicanery. They are off the hook. May as well stop watching unless they fuck up. The chairman of the senate panel doesn't seem like a seasoned lawyer so I don't think this will net anything of interest. He doesn't seem like he'll trick them into giving anything away. Opening statement says it all.
The only thing I can see nailing Dominion is:
if it can be proven that their employees attached the machines to the internet and if there were connection into the machines.
if their employees uploaded new code to the machines
Straight from their website it says that the dominion voting machines allow you count votes however you want, you program the parameters as an election worker and it uses those parameters
That doesn't help them so much, because if officials can alter it that easily then the software shouldn't be used anywhere in the country. Or any evoting for that matter.
Yeah. If nothing is attached to the internet until the voting is over, how does media keep those constantly updated results tickers running on TV? And if vote counts come from the county, not the precinct, how does the county get vote count updates if not via the internet?
PR is where candidates total votes are given a percentage based on their position in the race, rather than the number of individual votes. Leftists say Proportional Representation is 'more fair' to 'minority' political parties.
In Canada, lefty BC (Washington State North) had a Referendum on Voting in 2018. The Referendum was whether to change their voting system from most-votes to proportional-representation.
BC voted NO WAY to proportional representation in 2018. Unable to use Proportional Representation, the NDP took minority power by creating a coalition with the Green Party to 'beat out' the centrist party.
In 2019, the BC Election Commissioner Anton Boegman approved mail-in ballots and pushed for Dominion Voting Systems to oversee the election (DominionVS clearly explains their DVS proportional-tabulating option in their manuals).
In 2020, the far-left NDP 'won the most votes ever given to a candidate'.
Boegman, a Canadian, is Treasurer of the US COGEL group - Council on Government Ethics Legislation which is a proud 'progressive watchdog' lobbying for more-fair voting. It's members hold Ethics or Election positions across North America, Europe and Australia.
our software doesn’t allow fractions you’ll have to take that up with specific election officials
we just develop the software and are not present to see how the physical ballots are administrated.
These weak #^*! Questions that are not strategically worded are why this hearing had been a joke. We’ve got boomers here asking stupid tech questions hoping someone training the last 4 weeks to divert all answers is going to stumble and spill some beans. You need Ted Cruz questions here not these stupid questions easily refuted.
Why design hardware/software for ballot scanning that can even handle a data type beyond an integer?
Need to add?
1->2->3 etc.
Flag a ballot?
0 No 1 YES
Make a mistake?
3->2->1
In what world does a software engineer design a datatype that has no intended use in a glorified adding machine. Answer, he's doing more than just adding.
These politicians can easily nail this guy dead to rights if he they had the capacity to ask the right questions. Why there is no tech liaison for politicians/courts/boomer professions in serious need of technological help is beyond me. They aren't just stupid on their own right, they represent our communities, and we aren't this technologically illiterate.
So many ways to safeguard data but these guys aren't even thinking about that, they're still trying to remember their password on their phones and always saying "I hate this phone! It never does what I want it to do." They're appealing to their blind side and they are too arrogant as politicians to ever admit it.
The Dominion CEO just said that they do not use SolarWinds. That is 100% false! Here is the archived version of their login page which they just changed:
He also said it didn't have a ethernet port then had to retract that. This guy is full of shit. He gave half answers. But really the board is to blame for not pressing him more or asking better questions rather than, 'what have you done to secure your system'.
Cannot be hacked is false. It takes more or less resources but everything can be hacked. And from what I've seen a few minutes and some young nerd is all it takes here.
This asshole is such a fucking liar. Almost everything he’s saying has already been disproven. I’ll tell you where he’s been for the last 45 days.... clearly being debriefed, blackmailed or bribed to give this false testimony!!!
IMHO, he's trying to not be forced to admit they operate in the USA, but they're incorporated in Canada, and owned by Staple now, of which one founder is Biden's brother in law.
It’s not difficult enough. They had to over complicate it in order for cheating to be less obvious. Why would you just tally up the votes when you can run them through a tabulator, export a .csv file to a USB drive, manually review it on a spread sheet and then upload the results?
Well, if it's one vote, one number - not so hard. But when one vote is .083% of 1 and the Briben vote is 1.17% of 1 - it gets more complicated rather quickly... especially since that is illegal.
He's the CEO. What he said was something along the lines of he no longer owns the company -- it was acquired by a private equity company in 2018. But he's the CEO.
The guy who initially started the meeting. Maybe a charade to make us put stock in what this traitor is saying? Dunno. Not a lawyer. I just saw him raise his hand and repeat after the guy in the hearing room.
"LET ME BE CLEAR - NO BALLOTS ARE SENT OVERSEAS"
this guy is a wordsmithing liar. the TABULATIONS are sent overseas, NOT the paper ballots. Fuck this cat.
Depending on their loyalties it may not be 'fall for', but 'fall back on'. If the media provides cover for them then they have no reason not to. But if they do that then they have thousands of patriots for constituents and who knows when tarring and feathering might make a comeback
I believe they can remotely view the ballots
This committee doesn't really care, this is all a show, ... the Legislator in MI is blind, and they like it that way. We here in MI try to elect new officials all the time, but as soon as they meet with these other officials they are indoctrinated into this blind club and taught to just collect a paycheck.
"i'll fix the roads!" like fuck ya will.
Fuck Michigan's roads.
I don't know how they could be worse than those in New Orleans but I don't doubt they're equally bad. There are potholes in New Orleans notorious for swallowing small vehicles. Maybe why a great many of us drive full size trucks.
Ah. A fellow Michigander. That's the mating call of the Michigan politician since the invention of the automobile.
Same out here in Philly. I've lost everything(job, apt, savings) to the bullshit policies they've enacted this year. I've got two weeks left before I end up without a roof over my head or a bed to sleep on. If my city doesn't open up and FAST, i'm gonna be a pissed off pede on the governor's lawn until I'm allowed to go back to work.
Sorry man, I am lucky I got promoted right before this but I am still on the edge. Sucks.
Fresh start in a new state?
Hopefully somewhere warm, i've eating with change lately.
Don't know how to get out, i'm feeding myself out of my change jar right now. I can't afford a local bus out of here let alone get the little bit of shit that matters out of here.
There were so many lies in his opening statement, I literally lost count. From the Smartmatic denials to not connected to Internet, it was just one after another.
Depends on your definition of “ballot”. They were able to view the optical PDF (sometimes other file formats) of the ballot. The paper ballot stuff I have no clue on, didn’t do anything regarding the paper ballots.
The committee wants to believe Dominion. You can tell.
Dominion is credibly accused of fraud, error and the fucking RINO cucks believe the company. Calling all pedes in MI, WI, PA, AZ, NM, GA, we cannot let up in these swing states. This is a battle of will and we cannot allow the fake news, the establishment cronies demoralize us in this most glorious of fights. This is the republic. We are either a nation of laws or we are not.
He's being really tricky with words. Yes, MI doesn't have ranked choice voting, BUT THE FEATURE WAS ENABLED!
https://thedonald.win/p/11R4XDPeg1/ranked-choice-votingweighted-vot/c/
He really needs to double check because he said that it's impossible to enable RCV on those systems. Real easy to verify that claim.
My guess is that he doesn't know that it's able to be enabled. He doesn't even know the programming language. Software like this usually has all bells and whistles available but they are just disabled. Usually contractors can come in and secretly enable the bells and whistles for the client.
I think he's making a lot of claims that will put him in big trouble. He's probably getting on a plane tonight to Argentina.
I thought he was dancing around it, saying MI doesn't have ranked choice voting.
And then when talking about it if it were enabled, only referred to the happy path of using it with a RCV ballot.
He might have been dancing around it. He said that RCV could not have been used because the ballots were not RCV. Maybe he meant that it's unlikely that RCV was used if the ballots didn't have RCV on it.
He doesn't seem to know a lot about the capabilities of the software. He is having a hard time speaking about connectivity to the internet. It sounds like he's stupid, but I imagine he's just using scripted lines, and he's trying to reconcile the lies with the technical information.
Trying to reconcile the lines of his script when they don't reconcile with reality.
Software doublespeak. Like saying "that's interesting" when anyone reports a software bug.
There's a lot of playing hopscotch in a mine field here.
When he revealed the machines in that county all run linux .. that was the one time I saw him slip up
Haha, the servers probably do
The adjudication happened overseas as well.
Again, really easy to just turn on remote adjudication if it's available on other systems. They don't erase unlicensed products from the machines, they just disable them. If they "forgot" to disable those products, then they will be available for use. And they can blame the low level employees for the "mistake".
Another thing I hated Obama for.
Fuck dude. Yes. This. Every God damn other sentence.
Also "baseless claims"
Deboooonkkeeeddd
Sounds like an 80s pop ballad
Also "didn't see all the testimony"
He just said "Baseless claims" again.. it's like their vocabulary is limited to what the CCP tells them they can say
Baseless, as if there wasn't a metric shitton of circumstantial evidence and a forensic audit done...
Thousands of sworn affidavits = baseless
Christine Blasey Ford not signing an affidavit = Unimpeachable proof of gang rape
No Russia affidavits = Proof of collusion
BASEless = not BASED
Flashback to Rubio vs Christie with GEOTUS enjoying some popcorn.
https://youtu.be/CkdpzRDxTXU
projection
Muh Russia
Listen to this faggot already deferring blame onto election officials.
“I can’t help it they used the cheating function!”
There's a live hearing in CO too! Jenna Ellis is bringing the HEAT https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=756793398521499&ref=watch_permalink
Tuned in to hear REEEEEEEEEE. Dems are pathetic.
What is the name of that freak in MI who made a complete FOOL of herself? I think we got another one in CO!
https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=756793398521499&ref=watch_permalink
She is too damn angry at the AUDACITY that we look for fraud because there is no evidence of fraud in CO because we are busy with uhhh other things
Jenna Ellis is a goddess.
Reminds me... she single?
She's probably out of your league, no offense. Unless you are somehow a federal litigator or multimillion dollar business owner.
He’s a night janitor, but don’t go ruining a pede’s dream like that
Just tell her you're a full-on rapist...
I mean philanthropist
so you are saying Jenna is a gold-digger or only dates lawyers? Didn't know you knew her so well.
HERE WE FUCKIN GOOOOOOOO
Thanks for this, naturally this is kept hush as possible.
I had to turn if off. The rigger was annoying to listen to
Finally going to get this rat under oath. Expect LOTS of lying. Give him all the rope necessary to hang himself. Next week with the Maricopa county results, he'll be cooked.
He won’t have the last laugh.
Executive Order is especially about stuff this guy is the front man for. He won't escape. The DS is not going to save him. They are overexposed right now.
It will be a presentation. He is there for spin. I highly doubt anything will come from this. Michigan is cucked.
I'm pretty sure they'll be able to ask him some questions. You don't threaten a subpoena for him to just pull out powerpoint, and scurry off afterwards.
kinda makes you go mhhhhhhh
How much were the poll books off by?
Why are pollbooks treated like an infallible record? Aren't they able to be fraudulent?
Several dumbass articles have said: "There is no way to manipulate the vote outside of adjudication, and thus the election was safe" ignoring the 68% error ratio and the completely wiped adjudication logs.
They really think we're stupid.
Then this idiot went and said "there is no way to turn on ranked choice voting, despite the audit clearly showing that not only was it ON, but there were only two options that WEREN'T on. Mans is a bold liar.
Consequences though?
He definitely didn't write it. It is specifically targeted at all the points the GOP has been targeting.
mark elias the DC crook lawyer and his team run all their traitorous operations
He’s the dude in Breaking Bad about eat some chicken nuggets and then off himself in the shitter with the defibrillator machine.
He's also one of the Founders, so you'd think he would be using "Our" and "My" too for that reason.
Can't find anything about this guy on LinkedIn.
Check out this article by him: https://www.wsj.com/articles/fake-claims-about-dominion-voting-systems-do-real-damage-11606755399
He defers most of the fraud to Democrats and election officials. For example he flat out states that Dominion doesn't care where the ballots come from, they can be completely fake, but Dominion machines will still count them anyways.
This shit pisses me off beyond believe. These fucking hearings are always a god damn joke.
We've got people asking questions that they don't understand, about technology they don't understand, scripted by people who they don't understand, being answered by a dude who understands and can ring around the rosie the fucking answers.
Is there some fucking horseshit law that prevents people that know what the fuck they're talking about to be involved with this shit?
Why wasn't the forensic audit team there to basically cross examine him
Because he wouldn’t have shown up
Like the first time he was subpoenad?
Yep. This is the problem with politicians everywhere.
These are the people that call the cable company when they switch the input on their tv.
True
Exactly how I feel every time. Especially as a person who has an extensive background in the IT field, I also want to scream that them. I wish I could some how help at these hearings.
I would rather wait for the recap. I can't handle so much treasonous lying at the moment.
Hanging is to good for these kinds of people. I am sure we can think of something much better.
Arrest him, now. Do not let him flee or go into hiding like Coomer.
Yes. Arrest this traitor immediately
A lot of the what the Dominion representative is saying is the same as what I've said as a specialist in systems like this.
If you do things properly it's pretty hard to cheat with the machines because you can always compare to the paper ballots. There are basically techniques where you do not have to do so exhaustively.
Personally I'm sceptical of Dominion as a large direct cause of fraud in miscounting but there are enormous caveats.
He's saying it should be easy to check. Absolutely. But all of that is theory. Have all materials actually been preserved securely and have all results been tested in this way? The answer to that is no. Otherwise that evidence would have been presented in defence of suits long ago.
I can tell you if I had a Dominion insider and I asked them how to cheat they would say don't do it the way people are suggesting it might be most easily done or it will be detected.
In that case either you do it a different way or you ask how it would be detected then target that. You may simply hope to delay detection enough for it to be deemed too late.
Dominion isn't an attack vector in the way people think it is. Just the insider knowledge or access can be pretty dangerous and that is one of many possible attack vectors.
Their representative is making some bold statements that he cannot know. Overly defensive of the product and that it's never to blame or involved. Even if he knows nothing of foul play from his end it's certainly possible for operators to abuse the machines. For him to state that this has never happened is not something we can actually know and investigations suggest that it has happened.
The whole pipeline needs to be investigated but the Dominion representative dropped the hint himself. The best place for fraud is upstream.
It was certainly a tool to cheat, but I think too many hands were using the tool and it got too sloppy, which is how it got detected. I think you are correct in the clock running out for discovering it, but I think there is enough found (thanks to the sloppiness) that there is time.
I cannot listen to him because I'm exhausted from all the BS. Thanks for the run down.
I have no doubt that actors will have cheated all over the place in many ways. Regardless of what I think the odds are of what it's irrelevant, you run the match and see what the result is. The argument that they would have avoided cheating that way because it's easily detectable isn't sufficient excuse to then not try to detect it, after all it's easy right? If it turns out not to be easy then you have a big problem.
The Dominion thing is a bit of a distraction from areas of fraud where it was more likely but is inherently harder to detect. As well as other activities that basically amount to the same damage as fraud even if you might term them or describe their mechanism differently.
A lot of the fraud is likely to be ineligible voting and unequal protection (illegals, multiple voting, stealing identities, under age, sending out ballots to everyone, making it easier for one type of voter, disappearing ballots, etc).
For stuff harder to detect like that requires a more extensive audit and in passing you'll pick up what's easy to detect or when it's hard to detect for example due to missing hard copies.
There are more extensive means of fraud possible with Dominion if there is extensive systems integration. That means for example if they can back fill, hard copies for example, voter registration database, etc. Usually that would involve not only Dominion.
To rule that out you would need a forensics team with people like me going in to actually look at it. There's only so much you can gleam from speculation. If the Dominion representative believes they can wash their hands clean of any responsibility and have nothing to worry about then they should welcome this.
Dominion hardware and software is built from the ground up to facilitate election tampering. Why does it have an algorithm, the weighted election feature built into the software? Why is it so easy to delete votes? Why is it so easily to make changes with a damn USB? Why was there significant effort in the software to hide changes to vote totals? Every one of these features is included in order to facilitate cheating. These were selling points to the crooked politicians who decided to buy DVS in the first place. There's a reason Texas refused DVS 3 TIMES - crappy security, crappy software.
The freaking company name is FLAUNTING it in our faces. Dominion. These low life politicians used our tax $$ to buy voting equipment that is garbage and they chose it to perpetuate their control over us. It facilitated election fraud on a scale that is historic. 68% error rate with no history of how those ballots were adjudicated?
These machines should be confiscated from around the country and smashed to bits. Back to hand counting with observers at every step of the way until we can agree on some alternative that is bulletproof against fraud.
This testifying in Congress means nothing to me. It's just theater.
I've built systems like Dominion before, self service machines and betting machines. It's really easy to cheat but hard to do so undetectable.
If the handling of the ballots is set up right and the election run properly it wont matter how insecure the machines are.
They are already in trouble as from what I've seen Dominion fails on a lot of standards which in itself is a scandal. It's not easy to understand why when you seen how strongly for example their CEO comes to the defence of the product. Their quality control process heavily relies on marketing alone.
The notion that they don't get involved in how people run their elections might work in corrupt countries but they do not seem to understand what it means to operate in a country that actually intends to properly conduct elections. This is a common failure in business. To assume if something works once then stick to that across all markets.
When it comes down to it all that matters is the science. Not the speculators. They should be welcoming and even demanding a full audit themselves. In fact what they are talking about, comparing to a hand count should happen every time as a matter of procedure and we should already have full evidence of this available. No system is perfect, it's impossible, you must always verify it as standard.
It is theatre or just theory. There's no good the CEO rattling on about all the science that's possible yet nothing is being done to do all the science possible.
What I’m curious about is whether the machines have the ability to change the vote mark on the scanned ballot image during adjudication. Seems like they can but I don’t have confirmation.
That's a good question. I recently watched a vid where they were demonstrating the adjudication process, but they didn't really address whether or not the image file was altered. What they did demonstrate is that not only can the adjudicator fix the 'mistake', they can also change every other thing on the ballot to whatever they want. The changes should get recorded - audit trail - but we have deleted audit trails, don't we?
Also, on that note I have been mulling over for a couple weeks what actually happened during the georgia “hand count”. Were the scanned images considered the physical ballots? What happened to the original physical ballots of those that had “errors” and were adjudicated? If they were replaced with images that could have been altered, I think we have our source of the dominion related fraud. I don’t see hardly anyone talking about these questions.
We need robust systems that have election security as part of the design basis, not built in options to cheat. Take a look at PCI DSS protocols that were developed for cc transactions and bank transactions over the web. Not everything in PCI DSS applies to election system security, but it's a start.
That's where you need a detailed analysis. If you're not careful in the wrong hands all the processes for flagging anything wrong or fixing things can be used as quality control to make sure they cheat effectively as well as identifying for them first what didn't go through so to dispose of it.
I agree that no system is perfect. Even hand counting with observers at every step of the way cheating can still occur. It's the human factor. But I'm not talking about the human factor. I'm talking about the manufacturer's DVS equipment being designed to facilitate election fraud.
Consider these two features:
The excuse that Dominion gives for the weighted election feature being on their machines is 'it's there for our condominium customers'. That's total BS and really pisses me off. The value of just one state buying DVS is on the order of a 100 million dollars times multiple states. The software could absolutely be customized to remove weighted election feature - and it should have - no excuse. Whatever sales person said that should be bitch-slapped.
Here's another reason I don't buy the 'it's in there for our condo customers' excuse. Here in Massachusetts, the DVS machines have the feature of recording ballot images disabled in the software. DVS did that per this state's request even though it is possibly a violation of federal election law for record retention. So, DVS absolutely CAN make a change to software to make a sale, but yet they don't remove the weighted election option in the product line sold to state governments? IMO, that is an untenable position.
The existence of #2 has no possible justification. It's sole purpose for existence is to hide the fact that cheating occurred. In the last 2 weeks, 2 different sources I looked at say Dominion software does this.
From a software engineering background including systems like this, in practice, not theory, I'm not particularly alarmed by that feature in and of itself. In terms of software it's infinitely compromised by the software engineers alone and I'm not sure you may understand what's possible. It's possible to weight votes how you like without an obvious feature like this.
However shipping builds with features like that available to an operator on the front end in a crucial race is something they should have really addressed long ago. The impression I get is that the software is cluttered with inappropriate feature creep that ends up in the hands of the end user when it's something they absolutely do not need nor should have.
I would personally ship the feature and then have it as a honeypot but I'm just evil like that. You click the button, the machine goes mental, alarms good off, it starts waving it's servos, jams up and screaming that it's being molested to anyone in the proximity like one of those car alarms printing out and flashing to call the company.
That's most likely money laundering if true. Happens all the time. That's way over priced. Procurement scam. If they're paying so much more than necessary it's automatically not even suspect. You know they're embezzling.
There are much worse ways they can weight votes in secret which is inherent to a software solution.
There are a lot of things wrong with Dominion on multiple levels which make it a bad choice but what we need to do is search for real definitive problems.
I disagree. Pedigree traces back to Venezuela. Designed to steal elections, not for honest elections. Front for SmartMatic. You're not changing my mind, so EOS.
They're heavily tied to corrupt nations operating both in delivering services and in sourcing services themselves. The impression I get is that they have a policy of turning a blind eye because that can get you in trouble in providing services in these kinds of countries.
If you're going to say designed to steal elections it doesn't really mean anything beyond personal opinion if you can't explain how. I take the approach of what might be sufficient to actually press charges. That requires looking into things much more deeply.
It looks like me that their entire business culture is designed to relinquish culpability but outside of that they don't care. If you snoop around into things or put your nose where it doesn't belong in the countries they operate it gets cut off. They almost say as much explicitly. I suspect you'll find their system is designed in such a way to offload blame and that's the limit.
What's you're looking for is not likely entirely all design. It's an evolution from a system of perpetual neglect.
Their customers are often questionable states. Their motto is we don't care how you run your elections. You're basically paying for someone to help provide election systems who didn't see nothing in the event of foul play.
Where the fuck is he by the way?
Probably in a national park, curled up in a rug, arkancide style.
Cooming
Hopefully dead found with a suicide note and a gunshot to the back of the head.
He flaunts the word "bi-partisan" as if that means shit fuck to us. What a joke.
Bi-partisan is like putting a dildo in your ass while you read sports illustrated tranny swimsuit edition
Bi-partisan in a one party state.
Bi-partisan is democrats supported by CCP
Lol what? Dominion isn't able to affect the outcome of an election? It's literally how votes are tabulated!
I hope he said that - it's easy to show it's a lie.
He did. I've been live commenting/reacting.
Thank you, Pede!
County officials are able to change votes/outcomes, using Dominion applications. Obfuscating and conflating like a MF'r.
Sure seems like he's shifting a whole lot of the blame to the LOCAL government....
i.e.... my software and hardware are just Tools; the Local Government Officials are the ones that used those tools to cheat...
interesting... hmmmm...
That's exactly what he's doing.
If what we've seen is true, they designed it for their manual intervention during adjudication.
They're accomplices. The "oh we didn't know lol" card isn't going to work here.
It’s a fucking adding machine. You can count votes with an 🧮 abacus. Why in the hell would any state pay $100M for this POS software? Must be all those “features” that you would only need if your preferred candidate was way behind on election night.
Bingo!
It’s like the South Park episode where Mr. Mackey orders IntelliLink for the school
My thought exactly!
Way bigger flaws and lies than that.
That's not their fault. That's the fault of the election officials.
When asked about whether ranked choice voting could be turned on, he said No.
When asked why not, technically, he said "Look at the paper ballots. RCV was not used and cannot be used."
That's not an answer.
Like much of the bullshit he's spewed. As a software engineer I can tell you 50% of his statements are complete lies.
But it doesn’t help with these poorly worded questions either, with senators saying 5 different things in one question.
Most people do non-answers. Zuckerborg is an expert at it.
They could be asked a question and say something along the lines of "Well, policy says that we..." or "Proper procedure requires that we..."
They're never direct answers because they're too afraid to plead the fifth because saying that alone makes someone untrustworthy.
https://thedonald.win/p/11R4XDPeg1/ranked-choice-votingweighted-vot/c/
Exactly!
Spot on. Why no follow up?
Ranked choice? I thought the issue was the weighted race feature. I don't see what ranked choice has to do with anything.
Nevermind, I see it might be a subset of that feature. If that's the case then the guy outright lied. Nothing stops someone from turning it on. In fact they should have asked him that. The paper ballots thing makes no sense, that has nothing to do with it unless it is hardcoded in a barcode or something, which I doubt it is.
People have said that this was the mechanism where the weighted algorithm was introduced into the system.
The guy is now trying to divert attention off of Dominion to the local official. It was the county! Not us!
Well that was the output from yesterdays forensic audit.
Are you saying you think the average Democrat would count votes for Hitler?
At the time everyone was looking for him, I made the point that Osama could have walked onto almost any military base in the world if he had the right ID and followed local protocol. Even more chance if he did so at peak morning time.
Which may technically be true.
And all these counties with your machines have the same problem. The political party that all votes switched too is also heavily invested in your company. Crazy coincidences
Reminds me of every ducking time I talk to insurance, ‘it was the health providers talk to them’
‘It was the insurance call them’,’ but I just called them’
Precisely
Just admitted the machines will count the ballots over and over again
Right. All they need is a bar or qr code to stop that. Basically it is a very exploitable system that overlooks major attack vectors in the name of 'the workers should be 100% honest' which is never true and why you would want a 'secure' system in the first place. Basically admitting that his product fills no need.
The workers were seen covering the bar codes with stickers or white tape in order to keep scanning them.
This is a big piece - for wayne county where 70% of the poll books were off. This guy seems to confirm this was done(multiple scanning of ballots). Curious how far off those poll books were.
Dr. Shiva just tweeted: Questions for MI legislators to ask Dominion:
Is deletion of #BallotImages against Federal law?
Do you have a Weighted race feature?
Why do you provide an option so auditing capabilities of any election can be bypassed?
What is your relationship with NASED?
This.
Just ask him why his machines allow up to a 70% error rate and why he won't answer questions about Eric Coomer.
He'll say
"Any error rate is due to human error. Election officials need better training."
and
"I will not talk about specific employees for their safety."
Called it!
"We supply machines. We do not run elections." Nice
They will run on that when everything else fails. In fact I predict that they will strike a deal later to admit and support everything in exchange of "we were hacked, we didn't know, it was all locals and foreign power"
“You can’t manipulate votes via our software.”
Well here is a video of YOUR SOFTWARE in action: https://rumble.com/vbqnsr-dominion-voting-software-in-action-easy-vote-manipulation.html
Yeah, it's probably some lawyer snake speak bs.
"You can't manipulate votes via our software. Ballots, on the other hand..."
The software doesn't manipulate the votes, it's a User who does that. Our hands are clean! We swear!
He LIED about SolarWinds under oath!
He chose his words carefully on that answer. He didn't say they don't use SolarWinds, he said they don't use a specific SolarWinds service or product.
Bingo!!! Yet they changed their homepage to remove any trace of solar winds.
His whole testimony is a lie under oath, LMAO!
Lied about $400 million from the CCP too. Laughing them off as some crazy story.
Detailed article here on the CCP connection https://gofile.io/d/Th7I2N
FUCKING LIAR!
RANKED CHOICE VOTING WAS ENABLED IN ANTRIM!
https://thedonald.win/p/11R4XDPeg1/ranked-choice-votingweighted-vot/c/
We will claim they didn't know. They will claim they didnt run it. They will claims "they thought" it is not possible and they will claim it was hacked. "We just sell the machines" line
It causes an undervote that goes to adjudication.
Iirc this would allow for weighting votes. Otherwise all ballots would be served to adjudication.
Who enabled it, Dominion or election officials? Read my post above.
They don't just sell machines. They sell the code for them, too - the code that does the actual fraud/tampering.
He's trying to pull a "plausible deniability" defense, but it's not going to work out for him. If his employees crafted code that could steal elections, and he's unaware of it, tough shit. You're CEO, your literal job is to not let that shit happen.
Not wasting my time listening to this shitheel.
Well he did say that only absentee ballots are sent to adjudication and that's a flat-out lie.
Well not only that, he said there was no digital adjudication in Antrim and ranked choice voting wasn't enabled, despite the audit proving both of these wrong.
Except the sales pitch is lookey here, you will never lose an election again!
And the news will repeat tonight "it's been debunked" realizing they are only using his words and they know the general public will eat it up and not think further past their flimsy explanation.
I have a legitimate question, why the fuck are we using a Canadian voting system? Yeah, chinese, commie, etc, but why a Canadian? Hell, Canadian tv shows suck compared to American ones, and ours are garbage
Btw, canadians vote on paper only with ID.
Sadly, some cities do not enforce the ID policy...
Solarwinds is backed by the CCP. Not to be confused with the CPP. It’s the equivalent to our social security fund. Refer to EO13848. Theyre fucked
Also worth noting - Canada does not use these machines. Everything is hand counted.
https://twitter.com/ElectionsCan_E/status/1323622230559924224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1324013745681649672%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es2_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbc.ca%2Fnews%2Fpolitics%2Felections-canada-political-interference-1.5791693
Don't get me wrong, there's plenty of ways for politicians to line their pockets. They just haven't done that in Canada. Yet.
This above all else. Why are we using anything foreign to run US elections?
With all this overseas commie bullshit we can't even charge fuckers for treason if we wanted to.
WHY ARE WE USING COMPUTERS TO COUNT BALLOTS? Computers should never be part of the vote process at all. I am a computer guy BTW.
Canada is just a CCP shill at this point. Just a way to obscure CCP.
wtf is this supposed to prove: Q: Did your company commit fraud ? A: No we would never Everybody: See no evidence stupid drumpf trying to steal the election
Did he not read the forensic audit?
Of course not. He already knew what that would find
Yes but it's been debooooooonked damn you.
is there a supposed debunking out there? i'd like to read it.
It was debooooonked weeks ago! CNN said so!
Yes and he's shifting the blame to whoever operated the machines.
thats where the audit put the blame
Wait a minute...
Earlier, the guy claimed that he didn't know if any Dominion employees were in MI and had no information about any of that.
Now he knows that "two employees and a 1 day contractor" were there and even knows Melissa's name and that she testified.
Oddly specific information for someone who has no information.
This is what happens with lies. You forget some of them and get caught.
Then he says thousands of "one day contractors".
Yeah, they clearly rehearsed the "one day contractor" line to rebut Melissa.
From what I'm hearing, and all that is needed to be heard from the opening statement, is that they are going to blame election officials for any chicanery. They are off the hook. May as well stop watching unless they fuck up. The chairman of the senate panel doesn't seem like a seasoned lawyer so I don't think this will net anything of interest. He doesn't seem like he'll trick them into giving anything away. Opening statement says it all.
The only thing I can see nailing Dominion is:
if it can be proven that their employees attached the machines to the internet and if there were connection into the machines.
if their employees uploaded new code to the machines
I think Lucido's aim is not to nail Dominion, exactly, but to nail SOS Benson. And to that end, I think he did a good job.
Agree
Employees can adjudicate ballots any which way they want. This needs to be confirmed with the CEO.
Employees or election officials working at the polling locations? Big difference.
We already know election officials can. I just want the CEO to confirm that.
Straight from their website it says that the dominion voting machines allow you count votes however you want, you program the parameters as an election worker and it uses those parameters
That doesn't help them so much, because if officials can alter it that easily then the software shouldn't be used anywhere in the country. Or any evoting for that matter.
Yeah. If nothing is attached to the internet until the voting is over, how does media keep those constantly updated results tickers running on TV? And if vote counts come from the county, not the precinct, how does the county get vote count updates if not via the internet?
Adding
if their employees assisted in printing more ballots i.e. I believe that is what Mellissa alluded to with the "Chicago Warehouse" situation
That's the type of info we need but is still the fault of the local officials. They should know better.
They should have an engineer asking the damn questions, not these twats.
Gotta give the dude or whoever wrote his answers some credit.
Genius level semantics abuse, dancing around questions, and strawmen here.
FREUDIAN SLIP X100 ....."We dont manipulate anything, all our software does *(pause_)"......
If there are any senators reading this. I would like to know. 1. Why count the votes in fractions.2 what safeguard against multiple ballot scanning
THIS! Votes are whole numbers! 1 or 0.. There are no fractions...ever.
Don't ballots have a unique serial number??
"Proportional Representation"
PR is where candidates total votes are given a percentage based on their position in the race, rather than the number of individual votes. Leftists say Proportional Representation is 'more fair' to 'minority' political parties.
In Canada, lefty BC (Washington State North) had a Referendum on Voting in 2018. The Referendum was whether to change their voting system from most-votes to proportional-representation.
BC voted NO WAY to proportional representation in 2018. Unable to use Proportional Representation, the NDP took minority power by creating a coalition with the Green Party to 'beat out' the centrist party.
In 2019, the BC Election Commissioner Anton Boegman approved mail-in ballots and pushed for Dominion Voting Systems to oversee the election (DominionVS clearly explains their DVS proportional-tabulating option in their manuals).
In 2020, the far-left NDP 'won the most votes ever given to a candidate'.
Boegman, a Canadian, is Treasurer of the US COGEL group - Council on Government Ethics Legislation which is a proud 'progressive watchdog' lobbying for more-fair voting. It's members hold Ethics or Election positions across North America, Europe and Australia.
Let me help with that:
These weak #^*! Questions that are not strategically worded are why this hearing had been a joke. We’ve got boomers here asking stupid tech questions hoping someone training the last 4 weeks to divert all answers is going to stumble and spill some beans. You need Ted Cruz questions here not these stupid questions easily refuted.
Why design hardware/software for ballot scanning that can even handle a data type beyond an integer?
Need to add? 1->2->3 etc.
Flag a ballot? 0 No 1 YES
Make a mistake? 3->2->1
In what world does a software engineer design a datatype that has no intended use in a glorified adding machine. Answer, he's doing more than just adding.
These politicians can easily nail this guy dead to rights if he they had the capacity to ask the right questions. Why there is no tech liaison for politicians/courts/boomer professions in serious need of technological help is beyond me. They aren't just stupid on their own right, they represent our communities, and we aren't this technologically illiterate.
So many ways to safeguard data but these guys aren't even thinking about that, they're still trying to remember their password on their phones and always saying "I hate this phone! It never does what I want it to do." They're appealing to their blind side and they are too arrogant as politicians to ever admit it.
The Dominion CEO just said that they do not use SolarWinds. That is 100% false! Here is the archived version of their login page which they just changed:
https://web.archive.org/web/20201214093452/http://dvsfileshare.dominionvoting.com/Web%20Client/Mobile/MLogin.htm
good find. this is from Dec 14 2020? so they changed it....today??
Send that immediately to those legislators! Might actually piss them off to be lied to on national broadcasts
They might say the corporation doesn't use it but the state admins might
He said the Orion Suite.
Then why not clarify? “We used SolarWinds xxx, not Orion.” Why change the website?
Because he is a POS snake.
Considering they tried multiple times over the past few years to get certified there and texas flat out said no, you would think he would know
I think they just didn't certify the newest version.
It could have been a question to test his credibility - he failed
Unfortunately there are two counties in Texas running Dominion under the Premier brand.
Imagine owning your own company and having to read off a paper how it was founded. This guy is a piece of work
Big emphasis on helping blind people
He must think that will somehow negate the treason charges
He also said it didn't have a ethernet port then had to retract that. This guy is full of shit. He gave half answers. But really the board is to blame for not pressing him more or asking better questions rather than, 'what have you done to secure your system'.
Cannot be hacked is false. It takes more or less resources but everything can be hacked. And from what I've seen a few minutes and some young nerd is all it takes here.
It’s so sad that we would ask 100% better questions than these “know very little” politicians.
And this is why so many of our "arm-chair politicians" need to become our real politicians.
This asshole is such a fucking liar. Almost everything he’s saying has already been disproven. I’ll tell you where he’s been for the last 45 days.... clearly being debriefed, blackmailed or bribed to give this false testimony!!!
He's been researching this speech the entire time.
He says Dominion is a US company but then later that he started it in his basement in Canada.
IMHO, he's trying to not be forced to admit they operate in the USA, but they're incorporated in Canada, and owned by Staple now, of which one founder is Biden's brother in law.
if he's in america, he's american...did democrat re-education teach you nothing?
Yawn, a waste of time. Dude is a CEO and outright lying and speaking bullshit are part of the job description.
I've always said the real job of a ceo is to resign dramatically when a company fucks up to restore public image.
It’s not difficult enough. They had to over complicate it in order for cheating to be less obvious. Why would you just tally up the votes when you can run them through a tabulator, export a .csv file to a USB drive, manually review it on a spread sheet and then upload the results?
Common core, yo. Also, metric math like the Canadians use.
Depends how many people are voting for the person you are forcing to lose.
Well, if it's one vote, one number - not so hard. But when one vote is .083% of 1 and the Briben vote is 1.17% of 1 - it gets more complicated rather quickly... especially since that is illegal.
He's the CEO. What he said was something along the lines of he no longer owns the company -- it was acquired by a private equity company in 2018. But he's the CEO.
Of course, and he has been prepped with hours of pre-written statements.
He’s giving sound bites for the media to cover him with
I feel like there is a lie counter needed. Literally everytthingis a lie and there is already proof of 90% of it. Typical Dem playbook Lie and deny.
"Fact check" this faggot
Much like his software, every spoken word has a 68% failure rate.
More people are watching this than China Joe's speech last night!
Is he under oath?
Apparently he is. This is awesome, he is so fucked
Yes
Yes. Happened at the beginning.
To who? This isn’t a courtroom. Did he sign a sworn affidavit?
The guy who initially started the meeting. Maybe a charade to make us put stock in what this traitor is saying? Dunno. Not a lawyer. I just saw him raise his hand and repeat after the guy in the hearing room.
At the start of the stream, he was sworn under oath
Yes
Yes!