Actually, lower Ct value obtained by qPCR test doesn't necessarily mean that the person is infectious. In order to confirm infectiousness, virus must be isolated from the specimen, and be cultured in the lab, to see if it grows.
Now, there was a study published in August, which established the relationship between the Ct value, and infectiousness. The authors claim that at low Ct values between 15 and 20, which should mean that there’s a significant amount of the virus in the sample, nearly 100% of the virus that was shed was infectious.
However, with Ct values of 35 and higher, where only trace amounts of virus were found in the sample, none of that virus could be cultured in the lab, meaning that those individuals were not infectious.
So qPCR test shouldn't be used on its own to establish infectiousness, in addition to the fact that the whole hysteria regarding the virus should be dismissed completely, because there is no excess mortality in year 2020. Also, regarding ''asymptomatic transmission'' (complete BS), even our friend Dr. FrauDci said himself that:
'' Even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has NEVER been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there’s a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers."
Actually, lower Ct value obtained by qPCR test doesn't necessarily mean that the person is infectious. In order to confirm infectiousness, virus must be isolated from the specimen, and be cultured in the lab, to see if it grows.
Now, there was a study published in August, which established the relationship between the Ct value, and infectiousness. The authors claim that at low Ct values between 15 and 20, which should mean that there’s a significant amount of the virus in the sample, nearly 100% of the virus that was shed was infectious. However, with Ct values of 35 and higher, where only trace amounts of virus were found in the sample, none of that virus could be cultured in the lab, meaning that those individuals were not infectious.
So qPCR test shouldn't be used on its own to establish infectiousness, in addition to the fact that the whole hysteria regarding the virus should be dismissed completely, because there is no excess mortality in year 2020. Also, regarding ''asymptomatic transmission'' (complete BS), even our friend Dr. FrauDci said himself that:
'' Even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has NEVER been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there’s a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers."