2605
Comments (121)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
47
BritGroyper 47 points ago +48 / -1

Right, but if it's only 95% effective like they claim, but the recovery rate even before the vaccine was well above 95%, then what is the vaccine needed for?

If my body is 99% effective at killing a disease, why would I need something that's only 95% effective?

20
rocket_nazi 20 points ago +22 / -2

it would be 95% effective on the 0.04% failure rate.

like if you had one gun that had a 0.04% failure, instead of nothing, you have another with a 5% failure rate.

still stupid.

16
Jimmy_Russler 16 points ago +16 / -0

The 0.04% is for people who are severely ill. If you're healthy you have a 100.00% survival rate.

7
rocket_nazi 7 points ago +7 / -0

i'm all for people in vulnerable demographics getting it. but most people don't need it.