Well, as Dr. Shiva said, we should audit the ballot images. They are supposed to be saved for 20+ months or something. I bet you that those ballot images will be unavailable or "accidentally" deleted. In Dr. Shiva's case, he has pending lawsuit about that precise problem in MA.
Yep--I read that report from yesterday. And that is the point.
The fraud scheme was very well planned on many levels. They left nothing to chance and had such a large degree of "coincidences" that I believe that even the Democrats themselves could not have pulled it off without assistance from a much more nefarious organization or government. If it weren't for the unexpected surge of votes for Trump in these swing states, very few alarms would be raised.
I agree. But no court or judge is "brave" enough to do that. Not even SCOTUS it seems. Hence the Democrats and MSM narrative all these years--voter disenfranchisement. These magic words that are probably researched to yield maximum support from the sheeple.
Concentrating populations in high density housing makes ballot harvesting feasible. So creating and maintaining an expanding urban underclass is the essential element. Exploiting this underclass using the narrative of their oppression as a shield from scrutiny of the scheme? Voila! Examining fraud is racist. It disenfranchises the underprivileged. How dare you?
Have you no shame?
Otherwise it’s perfectly legal for me to use counterfeit money, so long is I claim it was given to me and the people that gave it to me removed the evidence to them making that counterfeit money!
This is the precedent that the court has set for us all.
This argument of “if they don’t follow the law then the ballots don’t count” doesn’t hold water. The courts have repeatedly refused to reject illegally counted ballots.
I’m not saying its “perfectly cool.” I’m just saying these repetitive arguments where somebody points out some voting procedure or process is illegal and then concludes “so the votes must be thrown out,” are ignoring the fact that courts all over the country have rejected that argument.
The rule from this election seems to be that if you want to exclude ballots, you need to catch them before they get jammed in the ballot box because once they’re in there the courts will not prevent them from being counted.
Of course, the courts haven’t confronted a case where throwing out the ballots might help a Democrat to win, so the argument might still hold water in that situation.
Catch fraud before it happens is of course an absurd argument... We all know that any court will throw the case out because of "standing"... You can't prove you were harmed before fraud even takes place and so any court will just laugh you out of their courtroom.
Destroying potential evidence or ballots in the first place is a fucking crime so no matter how you slice it these fuckers should hang or eat gruel from a plate on a dirty floor at the bare minimum for fucking around.
I agree--in order to do that, we have to be able to present our case in court. Which then turns into a circular problem because our courts have been infiltrated and perverted.
The fraud was multi-faceted. I personally don't trust the Chinese ballot story as we had American companies doing plenty of shady stuff with no shortage of evidence and links.
I think in races that weren't expected to be close who knows what steps were done. Would California ever be audited? Unlikely so they were probably even more brazen with how they cheated there and in other supposed Democrat strongholds.
You're an idiot. I'm one hundred percent on your side that ballots were printed, abused and filled out en mass to cheat this election, however I don't have to believe that they came from China when there are no shortage of Democrat companies doing them in the US and that every state was sitting on tons of empty ballots that could be filled out after the fact. Go look at Runbeck and their Democrat ties and how infested they were in at least 3 states where fraud was occuring including Tarrant County in Texas.
That's not how it works, you've got it backwards. They fake the numbers in a Dominion model that has nothing to do with the actual election and that's what goes out through the newswires via Edison (the smoking gun is the feed is too high resolution, they can't count fast enough to give updates at the rate and resolution that Edison reports). They later backfill paper to be something like the results they made up and already reported in case there's a "recount" (they at least need roughly the right number of pieces of paper) or, god forbid a hand audit (which they'll try to make "risk limiting" in one precinct they can stage properly).
"Elections" are fake. Including past ones, including many Republican ones, which is why they are fighting to protect the fraud.
Source: am part of the team that reverse engineered it.
Does 66% error rate imply that 66% of Biden votes are actual Trump votes? That the election is actually 27m Biden, 124m Trump? Because that's a landslide even I wasn't dreaming of.
No--the error rate means they send all those votes to manual adjudication, where they can then re-allot the percentages of votes they needed to "win." It doesn't mean that they have to flip ALL the 68% of adjudicated votes to Biden. They just needed a way to "adjust" and re-allocate the votes "properly" so that their candidate would be victorious.
Exactly. There's where the fraud occurs. That's the reason why they chased all Republicans out or made it impossible for them to have meaningful observation of those processes.
Also, keep in mind that the pool of poll challengers and observers can also be manipulated because they can basically hire "non-partisan" or self-ascribed Republicans to "balance" the Democrat challenger. There was testimony just today in CO that there were "fake" Republican observers hired there. And testimony in MI that "independent" observers were treated better than "Republicans" but still not treated equally to "Democrat" observers.
I don't understand how there could be so many rejected ballots that go to adjudication, were these mail-in ballots? The write-ins (daffy duck, Kanye, etc) must have been a small percentage, so that doesn't explain the volume. Were there election day in-person rejects? In my precinct ( a non-Dominion MI county), you fill out the bubbles on a sheet, insert it into a ballot scanner which sits atop a lock-box, and if it is filled out correctly, the ballot drops into the lockbox any you get a message on the screen, "congratulations, you voted!" If there's a mistake on the ballot, it kicks it back to you, you give it back to the election staff for them to void in their logs, and they issue a new blank ballot for you to 'try again'. There doesn't seem to be an opportunity for a reject without the voter knowing, on the in-person ballots.
I don’t know if this is how it works. It sounded to me like they just deliberately set up the software in the machine to have loads of internal conflicts so huge numbers of ballots get misread and diverted to adjudication. Then the Democratic operative running the polling location allocates the ballots however they want later that day.
Correct--you will see that mail-in ballots are terribly insecure. That is the reason why unsolicited mail-in ballots are such a threat and should NOT have been allowed. COVID was just the Scamdemic they needed to force the public to accept mail-in ballots.
You will find in Antrim, they will blame the high number of adjudications because the tabulators were NOT updated to the latest software version properly. The Dominion CEO pretty much already testified to this as such. This was very carefully crafted to make this complicated and coordinated fraud inexplicably a "Conspiracy Theory" to the ignorant masses.
But I think they underestimated most Americans, even though they have managed to propagandize two to three generations.
However, it's worth noting that a 68% adjudication rate is absolutely unprecedented - in previous elections the average rate was maybe 1/10 of that, if not less. So something was either seriously wrong with these machines where they were completely incapable of performing the most basic tabulation function an electronic voting machine can perform (scanning a fucking ballot accurately and consistently), or someone was deliberately triggering a high failure rate to flip votes by abusing the adjudication process. I'm pretty sure it was the latter.
From a "30,000-foot view" and overall standpoint, my hypothesis is that there was a fixed ratio that was pre-programmed based on the fraudulent polling (yes--they are all part of it willingly or unwittingly).
This subtle vote reallocation (which has been happening for years) would be virtually undetectable had it not been for the "unexpected" margins coming in on election day. So much so, they HAD to stop the counting to backfill physical ballots in many ways since all of the other subtle methods would be inadequate.
That's when the entire scheme started to fall apart and now is exposed.
at this point only a full audit and verification of signature plus a recount by hand can save the election. why you ask? devices that scan or make pictures of documents are using algorithms to process the data and those algorithms are faulty. proof?
this is a video of the very intelligent computer scientist, david kriesel, from the famous "chaos computer club" in germany. the title of the video is "david kriesel: dont trust any scan that you didnt fake yourself" and he discovered that scanners of certain companies altered the documents scanned. sometimes numbers got changed, a 6 turned into an 8, a 0 into a 9 or a 1 into a 7.
he then started to try and replicate this mistake, explains everything in detail, and manages to reconstruct the algorithm behind it. long story short: the algorithm as (accidentally) faulty to alter the documents.
why is this relevant?
if this has been done by accident, it can now be done on purpose, because it got reconstructed and understood.
Sounds like the tabulators scan the ballot into an image and then attempt to OCR it in order to read the text and determine which names are marked. It sounds likely that these images were then transmitted to a remote server to do the actual OCR interpretation since it probably takes more processing power that the tabulators themselves have. That's where the door for interlopers is flung wide open (hence authorities seizing the copies of data in Germany and elsewhere).
I think there’s still a point insofar as if they generate enough evidence, Biden will be a pretty weak president. Let’s at least make it so the entire country recognizes the Democrats cheated.
LMAO, the Q-tard LARPing grifter powell speaks yet again. i'm still waiting on that kraken and smoking gun she promised us by thanksgiving. next she will tell us '4 years of biden as dictator is PART OF THE PLAN!!!'
Why would you come back after being banned for legitimate criticism? If I get banned for pointing out bad info or saying I don't trust someone, I'm out. Echo chamber can go fuck itself.
Well, as Dr. Shiva said, we should audit the ballot images. They are supposed to be saved for 20+ months or something. I bet you that those ballot images will be unavailable or "accidentally" deleted. In Dr. Shiva's case, he has pending lawsuit about that precise problem in MA.
They were deleted in Antrim county
Yep--I read that report from yesterday. And that is the point.
The fraud scheme was very well planned on many levels. They left nothing to chance and had such a large degree of "coincidences" that I believe that even the Democrats themselves could not have pulled it off without assistance from a much more nefarious organization or government. If it weren't for the unexpected surge of votes for Trump in these swing states, very few alarms would be raised.
The thing is, if the evidence is "deleted" than there was no election... those votes can not stand... simple as that
They cheated. Trump won...landslide.
For fucks sake, courts, do not make us all go to war over this.
I mean, there's probably gonna be war if Trump wins through the courts. The reason will just be inverted.
I agree. But no court or judge is "brave" enough to do that. Not even SCOTUS it seems. Hence the Democrats and MSM narrative all these years--voter disenfranchisement. These magic words that are probably researched to yield maximum support from the sheeple.
That’s how it works.
Concentrating populations in high density housing makes ballot harvesting feasible. So creating and maintaining an expanding urban underclass is the essential element. Exploiting this underclass using the narrative of their oppression as a shield from scrutiny of the scheme? Voila! Examining fraud is racist. It disenfranchises the underprivileged. How dare you? Have you no shame?
That's the way it should be. Tell the "disenfranchised" that their elected officials fucked them over and to pick ones who don't do illegal shit.
That’s the way it has to be!
Otherwise it’s perfectly legal for me to use counterfeit money, so long is I claim it was given to me and the people that gave it to me removed the evidence to them making that counterfeit money!
This is the precedent that the court has set for us all.
This argument of “if they don’t follow the law then the ballots don’t count” doesn’t hold water. The courts have repeatedly refused to reject illegally counted ballots.
Correct
So it’s perfectly cool if I use counterfeit money, as long as I delete any logs of me making it?!?!
Cool, good to know!
I’m not saying its “perfectly cool.” I’m just saying these repetitive arguments where somebody points out some voting procedure or process is illegal and then concludes “so the votes must be thrown out,” are ignoring the fact that courts all over the country have rejected that argument.
The rule from this election seems to be that if you want to exclude ballots, you need to catch them before they get jammed in the ballot box because once they’re in there the courts will not prevent them from being counted.
Of course, the courts haven’t confronted a case where throwing out the ballots might help a Democrat to win, so the argument might still hold water in that situation.
Catch fraud before it happens is of course an absurd argument... We all know that any court will throw the case out because of "standing"... You can't prove you were harmed before fraud even takes place and so any court will just laugh you out of their courtroom.
In GA the recount just repeated the same “adjudication” process to match in order to match their fraudulent claims from the “election”
Destroying potential evidence or ballots in the first place is a fucking crime so no matter how you slice it these fuckers should hang or eat gruel from a plate on a dirty floor at the bare minimum for fucking around.
I agree--in order to do that, we have to be able to present our case in court. Which then turns into a circular problem because our courts have been infiltrated and perverted.
Right, so bypass the fucking state courts and get this shit to the Supreme Court.
So were there even ballots casted then?
HMMMMMMMMMMM.
That’s just as damning evidence as fraud.
Then invalidate all deleted ballots. It's that fucking simple. Are we assholes? Seriously?
The Dems don't care about laws and rules! There are no penalties for them. Stupid Americans!
Irrelevant. This is not the law. Look at what the courts have ruled.
It's a misdemeanor. 🤦♂️
It Should be one year Per voter disenfranchised.
That'd slow it the fvck down.
66% fraud and they still certified. Someone let me off this ride.
This is where I say "Ammo box", right?
Who is to say they're not reading premade ballot images rather than actual ballots? The system is beyond corrupt and broken and indefensible.
The fraud was multi-faceted. I personally don't trust the Chinese ballot story as we had American companies doing plenty of shady stuff with no shortage of evidence and links.
I think in races that weren't expected to be close who knows what steps were done. Would California ever be audited? Unlikely so they were probably even more brazen with how they cheated there and in other supposed Democrat strongholds.
That's beyond stupid. They didn't need to print ballots in China. They printed excess ones in America "in case" they were requested.
Go look at Runbeck and how almost all their donations were to Democrats and they print the ballots not just for most of Arizona and they were also working to scan those ballots supposedly in AZ. https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?contributor_employer=Runbeck&two_year_transaction_period=2020&min_date=01%2F01%2F2019&max_date=12%2F31%2F2020
https://runbeck.net/over-1-million-georgia-voters-received-absentee-ballots-for-the-june-primary/
https://www.fox4news.com/news/scanning-problem-affects-about-20000-tarrant-county-mail-in-ballots
You're an idiot. I'm one hundred percent on your side that ballots were printed, abused and filled out en mass to cheat this election, however I don't have to believe that they came from China when there are no shortage of Democrat companies doing them in the US and that every state was sitting on tons of empty ballots that could be filled out after the fact. Go look at Runbeck and their Democrat ties and how infested they were in at least 3 states where fraud was occuring including Tarrant County in Texas.
Trump won handedly there in 2016 https://www.star-telegram.com/news/politics-government/election/article114512593.html
and now thanks to Runbeck somehow he lost? No one's buying it as Tarrant was full of bullshit.
Biden just barely wins a spot Trump won in 2016 and yet the Republican senator wins by 5 points. There's no need for Chinese ballots when Runbeck is US based and will happily cheat. http://access.tarrantcounty.com/content/dam/main/elections/2020/1120/reports/cumulative.pdf
That's not how it works, you've got it backwards. They fake the numbers in a Dominion model that has nothing to do with the actual election and that's what goes out through the newswires via Edison (the smoking gun is the feed is too high resolution, they can't count fast enough to give updates at the rate and resolution that Edison reports). They later backfill paper to be something like the results they made up and already reported in case there's a "recount" (they at least need roughly the right number of pieces of paper) or, god forbid a hand audit (which they'll try to make "risk limiting" in one precinct they can stage properly).
"Elections" are fake. Including past ones, including many Republican ones, which is why they are fighting to protect the fraud.
Source: am part of the team that reverse engineered it.
TLDR: There is no spoon (er, election).
Does 66% error rate imply that 66% of Biden votes are actual Trump votes? That the election is actually 27m Biden, 124m Trump? Because that's a landslide even I wasn't dreaming of.
No--the error rate means they send all those votes to manual adjudication, where they can then re-allot the percentages of votes they needed to "win." It doesn't mean that they have to flip ALL the 68% of adjudicated votes to Biden. They just needed a way to "adjust" and re-allocate the votes "properly" so that their candidate would be victorious.
So if I understand correctly, 2/3 of the votes were put into a pool where poll workers than got to decide how to count them?
Exactly. There's where the fraud occurs. That's the reason why they chased all Republicans out or made it impossible for them to have meaningful observation of those processes.
Also, keep in mind that the pool of poll challengers and observers can also be manipulated because they can basically hire "non-partisan" or self-ascribed Republicans to "balance" the Democrat challenger. There was testimony just today in CO that there were "fake" Republican observers hired there. And testimony in MI that "independent" observers were treated better than "Republicans" but still not treated equally to "Democrat" observers.
I don't understand how there could be so many rejected ballots that go to adjudication, were these mail-in ballots? The write-ins (daffy duck, Kanye, etc) must have been a small percentage, so that doesn't explain the volume. Were there election day in-person rejects? In my precinct ( a non-Dominion MI county), you fill out the bubbles on a sheet, insert it into a ballot scanner which sits atop a lock-box, and if it is filled out correctly, the ballot drops into the lockbox any you get a message on the screen, "congratulations, you voted!" If there's a mistake on the ballot, it kicks it back to you, you give it back to the election staff for them to void in their logs, and they issue a new blank ballot for you to 'try again'. There doesn't seem to be an opportunity for a reject without the voter knowing, on the in-person ballots.
The machine just counts 68% of them as errors regardless of any actual errors
I don’t know if this is how it works. It sounded to me like they just deliberately set up the software in the machine to have loads of internal conflicts so huge numbers of ballots get misread and diverted to adjudication. Then the Democratic operative running the polling location allocates the ballots however they want later that day.
Exactly!!’
Correct--you will see that mail-in ballots are terribly insecure. That is the reason why unsolicited mail-in ballots are such a threat and should NOT have been allowed. COVID was just the Scamdemic they needed to force the public to accept mail-in ballots.
You will find in Antrim, they will blame the high number of adjudications because the tabulators were NOT updated to the latest software version properly. The Dominion CEO pretty much already testified to this as such. This was very carefully crafted to make this complicated and coordinated fraud inexplicably a "Conspiracy Theory" to the ignorant masses.
But I think they underestimated most Americans, even though they have managed to propagandize two to three generations.
1 area had 100k adjudicated ballots out of like 125k total ballots.
However, it's worth noting that a 68% adjudication rate is absolutely unprecedented - in previous elections the average rate was maybe 1/10 of that, if not less. So something was either seriously wrong with these machines where they were completely incapable of performing the most basic tabulation function an electronic voting machine can perform (scanning a fucking ballot accurately and consistently), or someone was deliberately triggering a high failure rate to flip votes by abusing the adjudication process. I'm pretty sure it was the latter.
Did they hold these in reserve as part of the pot of vote they could flip or could this be farmed out to a central location?
From a "30,000-foot view" and overall standpoint, my hypothesis is that there was a fixed ratio that was pre-programmed based on the fraudulent polling (yes--they are all part of it willingly or unwittingly).
This subtle vote reallocation (which has been happening for years) would be virtually undetectable had it not been for the "unexpected" margins coming in on election day. So much so, they HAD to stop the counting to backfill physical ballots in many ways since all of the other subtle methods would be inadequate.
That's when the entire scheme started to fall apart and now is exposed.
at this point only a full audit and verification of signature plus a recount by hand can save the election. why you ask? devices that scan or make pictures of documents are using algorithms to process the data and those algorithms are faulty. proof?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FeqF1-Z1g0
this is a video of the very intelligent computer scientist, david kriesel, from the famous "chaos computer club" in germany. the title of the video is "david kriesel: dont trust any scan that you didnt fake yourself" and he discovered that scanners of certain companies altered the documents scanned. sometimes numbers got changed, a 6 turned into an 8, a 0 into a 9 or a 1 into a 7.
he then started to try and replicate this mistake, explains everything in detail, and manages to reconstruct the algorithm behind it. long story short: the algorithm as (accidentally) faulty to alter the documents.
why is this relevant?
if this has been done by accident, it can now be done on purpose, because it got reconstructed and understood.
Does anyone buy the September vs October ballot / software human error bullshit that flipped votes for President?
I don't.
And this was a GOP county.
Are we supposed to trust the DEM counties?
I don't.
“Shaved” doesn’t really describe it in this instance. Shoveled would be a better description.
Yeah I don’t buy the half machines on wrong version and half ballots scanned on wrong version BS at all
So they can make up fake images for ballots that they moved around. Wow.
Sounds like the tabulators scan the ballot into an image and then attempt to OCR it in order to read the text and determine which names are marked. It sounds likely that these images were then transmitted to a remote server to do the actual OCR interpretation since it probably takes more processing power that the tabulators themselves have. That's where the door for interlopers is flung wide open (hence authorities seizing the copies of data in Germany and elsewhere).
I wonder if 66% was also the percentage of times the green button was pressed in Georgia.
They can literally change any ballot to anything they want.
Error rate of 66%? That's been deboonked already, sweety. It's actually 68%, lying drumpfie!
Paper ballot hand recount....
take the MACHINE OUT OF THE EQUATION.
I think there’s still a point insofar as if they generate enough evidence, Biden will be a pretty weak president. Let’s at least make it so the entire country recognizes the Democrats cheated.
LMAO, the Q-tard LARPing grifter powell speaks yet again. i'm still waiting on that kraken and smoking gun she promised us by thanksgiving. next she will tell us '4 years of biden as dictator is PART OF THE PLAN!!!'
It's almost as if he/she/they dont know wtf they are talking about.
Why would you come back after being banned for legitimate criticism? If I get banned for pointing out bad info or saying I don't trust someone, I'm out. Echo chamber can go fuck itself.