It only freed people in areas he didn't control and he would have allowed slavery if it would have saved the Union. At least according to writings in letters with friends of his.
You are correct, and the fact that he presided over the abolishment of slavery aside, Abraham Lincoln is up there with FDR as the worst President of all time.
Yes, I know Obama was terrible, but he was standing on the shoulders of these giants.
Lincoln permanently enshrined the paradigm of the state being enslaved and subservient to the federal government, and FDR created the welfare state to enslave the poor, both of which have done far greater long term damage than anything Zero could do.
While I do agree with everything you and Khakiclay wrote here, without Lincoln we wouldn't have a United States. Without reunifying the Confederacy with the Union, the two nations would have sniped at each other for centuries and we wouldn't have the powerhouse of freedom we do have, today. (And with Trump, we have a chance to weed out the interlopers.)
I'll take "flawed but usable" over "perfect but untenable" any day.
I don’t think it’s possible to project what would have happened if the north had let the south walk away.
It’s possible that would have happened, but it’s also possible that the country of Texas would be the world superpower now, and the northern states formerly known as the USA would just be Canada’s retarded stepbrother.
My only point in this, and I won’t hold it against you if you disagree, is that once we crossed the point of voluntary association into compulsory servitude, we lost the ability to walk away later if we came to an impasse again (much like we are at today with the leftists). Now a peaceful outcome is not possible.
Why would Texas go back to being its own country? Wouldn't it have remained part of the Confederacy? Texas never really wanted to be its own country. At least not back when it actually was.
Lincoln's biggest mistakes were 1. Choosing Johnson as his VP. And 2. helping to solidify the supremacy of the federal government. Otherwise though, he performed feats that made the 10 presidents before him look like nothing, I wouldn't call Lincoln a bad president at all. Like many of our top five juggernauts that we learn about in school, there's a lot of imperfections that they don't tell us about, but still a damn good president.
Probably more than that. But being a shill isn’t inherently bad for the country.
For example, if we had a president who was bought and paid for by Smith & Wesson who repealed the NFA and abolished the ATF, that would be fucking badass.
Depends on who is doing the buying; I would be surprised if it was ever anyone good like my example above but it doesn’t have to be bad. China, Bad. Big Pharma, bad, but probably not as bad as China. The MIC? Up there with big Pharma.
With that being said, I think permanently crippling states rights and the creation of the welfare state and perpetual government dependence are worse. Stocks go up, stocks go down, companies rise and fall - but the consequences of federal supremacy and government dependence transcend any particular corrupt business or politician.
Government dependence usually does but I’m not sure if that is any worse than companies buying the government to ensure they stay propped up as oligopolies. It was the robber barons who did the buying if I recall correctly. Massive steel and railroad conglomerates and so much more. Pretty infamous for using mercenaries to break up labor strikes by their workers.
He also fucked us by not sending the slaves back to their homeland even though he seemed to have really wanted to by his own admission through his writings. We haven’t and will never recover from this. The hoax of black victimization has been, and will continue to be a thorn in our side that has always been used to manipulate, and control the populace through subversion through guilt AKA original sin. The great diversity “melting” pot experiment failed a long time ago, and everybody knows this, but people are afraid of speaking the truth about it because they will be PNGed, and so the destruction of our country and western civilization will continue. 😞
Well if we’re being honest with history it didn't. It only applied to confederate states outside of his ability to enforce. Slaves in border states were left out over the fear that they would change sides and join the south.
The argument that it allowed slaves to be free once they escaped north is a stretch since northern states had been ignoring the fugitive slave clause for years.
The EP was mostly bravado that allowed Lincoln to turn the war into a moral crusade; which ultimately helped him win. (Well that and Sherman torching every building he found.)
The 13th amendment is really what helped black Americans.
So the 900,000 white men who died to free your people at the orders of Abe Lincoln failed to demonstrate that black lives mattered? FUCK YOU AND DIE! You not a black American but a commie traitor sowing the seed of hate.
The Northern soldiers fought for Northern dominance over westward expansion. They had all three branches of the federal government and intended to keep it that way in perpetuity. The Southern soldiers fought for their own rights as a people to expand west and south. Slavery was a central issue in the cultural difference between North and South (European ethnic makeup was another big one, and urban vs rural), but it was just a very big tree in a "forest of competing interests." That is to say, Yankees didn't sign up to die so that blacks could move into their neighborhoods and take their jobs.
The man behind the renaming of 44 of San Francisco's schools is a first grade teacher who was influenced by his parents - both prominent members of the Nation of Islam - who set up their own Islamic school
So this isn't even from some sort of woke white progressive group or black lives matter, it's from a radical islamist group. Trying to take us apart from within as always.
I can get behind that as long as we don't restrict our findings in these groups of "seditious vermin" to just specifically "Muslims." Let's go ahead and find and route ALL the "groups of sedition vermin" at the heads of our banks, schools, media, judicial, government institutions.
Of course— Marxists, identitarians, globalists of all stripes must be purged before the damage done to our culture is completely irreversible. In some ways, it already is. I’m just not sure we have an inquisitor up to the task. It has to be a gritty, knife-fighting, nationalist statesman.
Even the Constitution isn't an infallible shield against corruption. If it were, Jefferson would not have thought we'd need to water the tree of liberty from time to time.
lmfao and how much have black lives mattered in the history of Islam?
Consider this text from a famous Islamic historian written in 1377. The whole page is interested (it basically argues that the Persian people were genocided in the Arab invasion and never really existed the same after that), but the second to last paragraph is particularly illuminating.
Great resource whenever a leftist screams the vicious blood libel 'white people invented racism.'
There is honestly nothing you can do about people this far gone except leave them to fail in their own schools. Never, ever send your kids to these shitholes.
Greek and Latin from an early age? That's based. On a more serious note, retreating to friendlier institutions cannot replace fighting back against the left in more mainstream institutions, or their forward march will plow over what little we have left. Public schools going farther and farther left gives them something to offer as an example of how "far right" Catholic schools are in comparison, and they will in the near future get law fare victories over us, in cases decided on by Marxist judges.
DeMarquis Cantrell, the often overlooked progressive icon who freed the slaves, ended Jim Crow laws, and invented the term BIPOC. Patron saint of BLM and a close relative of George Kirby.
No, on the contrary, he helped slowly, but surely create the slavery of whites in America, and it’s all coming to a head now with the help of the communists including the CCP.
Wouldn't it make everyone happy to create a black nation (like those indian nations) and let all those black people move there and do whatever they want to do there?
The confederacy was based. Northern white and Southern white were fundamentally different peoples who had culturally diverged for 100+ years. In the context of Northerners coming to dominate all three branches of federal government and expanding the power of the federal government outside the bounds of the constitution, and in the context of European Romantic Nationalism of the 1850s, new borders with self-determination made perfect sense.
Yup, people either forget, or are ignoring that a war can be, and usually is made up of many different battles, and unfortunately one of those battles is along race/ethnicity lines. There is no disputing this no matter how hard you try. This is a hardcore unapologetic truth based by facts, and easily discernible patterns. Noticing, and acknowledging things in order to take advantage of your basic survival instincts does not make you an evil racist no matter how conditioned you have become by the media, and maybe even your peers to believe this.
The whole hoax of black victimization that started way longer ago than most people want to admit is the true subversion IMHO, it’s just that the commies will flock to any chink in the armor, and this is, and has been our biggest by far. Blacks were captured, enslaved, tortured, and sold by their on fucking people. I’m so fucking tired of hearing, and reading about revisionist history in order to brand me and others who look like me with “original” sin in order to guilt me to control me. FUCK THAT NOISE!!! I never have, and never will fall for that shit. I’m proud of my ancestors and what they accomplished wether they did have any part in slavery or not. Life was a motherfucker back then and everyone back then would be considered straight savages by today’s standards.
Here’s another reply I made a while ago on a similar matter.
“AKA throw the white baby out with the bath water that they just drowned it in. This is also why you don’t play the game by your rules, you play them by their rules and make them abide by them. When they try to shame you for what they perceive your ancestors may have done like when they bring up the (MUH 400 YEARS), you stand strong and proud without even flinching. You look them right in the face and tell them you’re not ashamed of anything your ancestors did. On the contrary, you tell them you are very proud of them and to possibly share ancestry with people who created the greatest country/civilization/culture that has ever existed that they wake up in everyday and force themselves to take part of/in because they also know deep down inside it’s the greatest place to live and exist because wypipo made and sustain it.
Make sure to let them know that almost everything they wake up to on a daily basis is part of huh whyte mans culture and ingenuity and by them using and taking part in any part of the system, they are submitting and admitting to the huh whyte mans greatness. If they are black(usually are), make sure you tell them you don’t blame them for being angry at their own African ancestors for capturing, abusing, and selling each other to the highest bidder where the large majority of them ended up in South America. 🤷🏼♂️
Lastly, make sure to hit them with the knockout blow by telling them you will never be ashamed of yourself or your ancestors and refuse to denounce any acts they did that has or may have lead to the creation of the greatest civilization/idea to ever come into existence. You tell them I am proud to have lighter skin and to be associated with the the creators and founders of this country whenever possible even if I’ve never had any ancestors involved with it’s creation. I then tell them that I’m sorry their ancestors were corrupt and weak, and couldn’t compete with people who might have been my ancestors who were obviously stronger and more intelligent in multiple different ways. 😎
STOP PLAYING THEIR VICTIM/SHAME GAME!!! Be proud of the creators of this country and western civilization even if they aren’t your ancestors. 💪🏻👌🏻👍🏻“
In the article the gripes of Abraham Lincoln seemed to center more around the treatment of the native Americans, which makes me wonder if they equate them with being black or if the reasonings are simply screwed up and fucky.
Downvote away, but Lincoln was an actual white supremacist, in the sense that he believed white people were inherently superior to black people, and always would be. He believed that freeing the slaves and allowing them to stay here would lead to never ending conflict, which is why he promoted the creation of Liberia in africa, a country specifically made for freed slaves (thus the name).
He did free the slaves, which he deserves credit for, but that wasn't his original goal or the reason he launched the civil war. It was more a reason to sell the bloodiest war in American history as people began to grow tired of it. It turned a political and economic war into a moral war. By the way, I know many here love Lincoln, including Trump. It may be that the Civil War was the right move given the context etc, but at least acknowledge that it wasn't fought to end slavery. It was fought to preserve the Union. The federal government was enforcing the fugitive slave act during the war, meaning that runaway slaves were being forcibly kidnapped and returned while hundreds of thousands of people were dying to free them? No. The slavery issue was part of the discussion, but it is revisionism to act like Lincoln was on a crusade to end it.
I don't know if any of the above is why they want to change the name of the school, but those are all facts.
A few quotes from Lincoln on race:
I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races. There is a physical difference between the two, which, in my judgment, will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality. I . . . am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position.
What I would most desire would be the separation of the white and black races.
. . . I will to the very last stand by the law of this State, which forbids the marrying of white people with negroes.
And yes, I understand he was a product of his time.
I think none of that qualifies strictly as a white supremacist belief. He may have espoused the idea, but those quotes don't support it strongly.
He says he doesn't intend to promote equality as it seems a fruitless endeavor (so he challenges the feasibility of the idea). 2. There is a physical difference: dark-skinned people fare better in sunny climates against burns (the increase in melanin concentration is an evolutive improvement). 3. He is in favor of his "race" having the superior position (which I don't think is false for anyone of any "race" wherever). 4. He stands for separation.
None of that is supported by a belief that white people are inherently superior due to genetics. The quotes don't say the superior position is "natural" or "owed" to white people. It may be instrumental.
It is entirely possible to have a stronger/smarter entity in chains, so long as you have the accidentals for it to happen; just as it is entirely possible for a stronger team to lose a game against a much weaker team. The status quo does not immediately imply the superiority. Sometimes it is just the first-mover advantage runaway effect and we are examining a too short time scale.
Everyone white was a white supremacist because nobody wanted to live under black supremacy.
They also knew that equality was a lie, and the races will always try and gain supremacy.
We however, proved ourselves much smarter than they. I mean, look around. Winning! It's obvious to everyone the massive contributions to American society blacks have made. They've basically made everything wonderful for us Anglo-Saxon whites. How could we live with out them?
For the most part what you're saying is pretty accurate, A lot of people look at Lincoln as a die-hard abolitionist that wanted to become president specifically to free the slaves, it's simply not true. The thing about Lincoln's quotes about ambivalence towards slavery could simply have been an appeal to moderacy at the time, it's hard to really know with politicians. I think back to Barack Obama's original stance on gay marriage, and how David axelrod said that he was faking that stance in order to appeal to moderate voters. This is a very common maneuver for politicians that are seeking radical change. Ie appear to be more moderate than you actually are.
They are trying to erase our history so we can become rootless, fail to understand our present, and be manipulated for where to go in the future. It's a classic tactic.
Honestly, any of that school's educators willingly going along with the name change needs to have their teacher's license revoked. This is quite literally history revisionism.
In Virginia, they changed the name of a high school named after Robert e Lee, and named it after John Lewis. The administrators gave themselves a round of applause after they voted, they don't give a damn. Even back when I was in school not too long ago, our teachers defended our historical leaders, maybe the Confederacy is a bit sketchy but this is such a rapidly radical change.
Doesnt matter what the white dude did.. they just hate him cause he is white lol. These assholes pull down statues of people that helped black slaves escape or be free for fuck sakes.
No matter what was done for the Left-tards, it was never enough. 620,000 boys and men died in our Civil War, more than any other War and probably all of them put together. And this is thanks that President Lincoln gets and the disrespect he is shown. Do they not realize the weight of those souls that rested on his shoulders for THEM. SHAME ON THEM FOR THEIR BLATANT IGNORANCE!
You have to consider the population size at the time too, it was a big chunk of people that died in Civil War, to say that Lincoln or those people didn't care about black people is pure historical vandalism.
I know they don't teach American history anymore... but come on, folks. Look up why the Republican Party was founded.
Abolition of slavery was the first and most important issue. Every single person who joined the Republican Party and built it up from nothing was an abolitionist, or wanted to keep slavery out of the North and West, and to make it increasingly rare in the South.
And Abraham Lincoln was not just some guy who joined the Republican Party and happened to get picked as their candidate. Look up the Lincoln/Douglas debates, when Lincoln explained in detail all the different ways that slavery was a horrible idea.
Now, not every Republican expected that they'd be able to free any slaves or end slavery in their lifetimes. (You can compare it to the pro-life movement today.) But they were all trying to make it happen.
aka emanicipizzle proclamizzle
Damn it I laughed to hard at this.
I needed to read that very comment right now! I haven’t laughed that hard in weeks!
same!
It only freed people in areas he didn't control and he would have allowed slavery if it would have saved the Union. At least according to writings in letters with friends of his.
You are correct, and the fact that he presided over the abolishment of slavery aside, Abraham Lincoln is up there with FDR as the worst President of all time.
Yes, I know Obama was terrible, but he was standing on the shoulders of these giants.
Lincoln permanently enshrined the paradigm of the state being enslaved and subservient to the federal government, and FDR created the welfare state to enslave the poor, both of which have done far greater long term damage than anything Zero could do.
While I do agree with everything you and Khakiclay wrote here, without Lincoln we wouldn't have a United States. Without reunifying the Confederacy with the Union, the two nations would have sniped at each other for centuries and we wouldn't have the powerhouse of freedom we do have, today. (And with Trump, we have a chance to weed out the interlopers.)
I'll take "flawed but usable" over "perfect but untenable" any day.
I don’t think it’s possible to project what would have happened if the north had let the south walk away.
It’s possible that would have happened, but it’s also possible that the country of Texas would be the world superpower now, and the northern states formerly known as the USA would just be Canada’s retarded stepbrother.
My only point in this, and I won’t hold it against you if you disagree, is that once we crossed the point of voluntary association into compulsory servitude, we lost the ability to walk away later if we came to an impasse again (much like we are at today with the leftists). Now a peaceful outcome is not possible.
Why would Texas go back to being its own country? Wouldn't it have remained part of the Confederacy? Texas never really wanted to be its own country. At least not back when it actually was.
Lincoln's biggest mistakes were 1. Choosing Johnson as his VP. And 2. helping to solidify the supremacy of the federal government. Otherwise though, he performed feats that made the 10 presidents before him look like nothing, I wouldn't call Lincoln a bad president at all. Like many of our top five juggernauts that we learn about in school, there's a lot of imperfections that they don't tell us about, but still a damn good president.
Wasn’t there a president that was literally bought by corporate elites twice? I would think he would be worst since he actually was a shill.
Probably more than that. But being a shill isn’t inherently bad for the country.
For example, if we had a president who was bought and paid for by Smith & Wesson who repealed the NFA and abolished the ATF, that would be fucking badass.
Depends on who is doing the buying; I would be surprised if it was ever anyone good like my example above but it doesn’t have to be bad. China, Bad. Big Pharma, bad, but probably not as bad as China. The MIC? Up there with big Pharma.
With that being said, I think permanently crippling states rights and the creation of the welfare state and perpetual government dependence are worse. Stocks go up, stocks go down, companies rise and fall - but the consequences of federal supremacy and government dependence transcend any particular corrupt business or politician.
Government dependence usually does but I’m not sure if that is any worse than companies buying the government to ensure they stay propped up as oligopolies. It was the robber barons who did the buying if I recall correctly. Massive steel and railroad conglomerates and so much more. Pretty infamous for using mercenaries to break up labor strikes by their workers.
He also fucked us by not sending the slaves back to their homeland even though he seemed to have really wanted to by his own admission through his writings. We haven’t and will never recover from this. The hoax of black victimization has been, and will continue to be a thorn in our side that has always been used to manipulate, and control the populace through subversion through guilt AKA original sin. The great diversity “melting” pot experiment failed a long time ago, and everybody knows this, but people are afraid of speaking the truth about it because they will be PNGed, and so the destruction of our country and western civilization will continue. 😞
Emancipation Locomotion
Wow...I needed to read that. I haven’t laughed that hard in weeks!
Manspashun Procsamashun.
I like the clause about big booty hoes.
There will be a SLEW of them after he's done presidenting.
In 2028 or thereabouts.
Shame on a rigga that tried to run gaaaame on a rigga.
Operation get behind the darkies
Didndu Academy
Well if we’re being honest with history it didn't. It only applied to confederate states outside of his ability to enforce. Slaves in border states were left out over the fear that they would change sides and join the south.
The argument that it allowed slaves to be free once they escaped north is a stretch since northern states had been ignoring the fugitive slave clause for years.
The EP was mostly bravado that allowed Lincoln to turn the war into a moral crusade; which ultimately helped him win. (Well that and Sherman torching every building he found.)
The 13th amendment is really what helped black Americans.
It also convinced England and France to fuck right off with their interventionist bullshit.
The Civil War didn't either. Neither did the 13th, 14th, or 15th amendments to the Constitution. Duuh. C'mon man!
OMG - what did they rename it? Cardi B's WAP High School
It'll probably be renamed after John Lewis, because John Lewis is the only good guy in America now
George Kirby High
Yes, he was. Too high.
"You know high school is not a school that you go to if you want to get high?" - The mom from Everybody Hates Chris
"I understood that reference" - Nancy Pelosi
St. George Floyd High School
Oh God, please don't give them any ideas.
George Floyd Fentanyl-High.
They added George Floyd to a holocaust museum so this seems more reasonable than that
I WAS GONNA SAY THIS!! LOL xD
Admiral Ackbar?
Robert Bird High School
The Corn Pop Teach'em-Up Good Center for Fatherless Poor Chilrens.
1st step program to incarceration?
Will kids there learn about roaches and about kids on your lap? Will there be classes on hairy legs?
That’s the best! Lol
What's the difference what they named it, none of their students will be able to read the sign anyway.
kek
👆🏻 He’s not wrong.
https://youtu.be/1T6lErrBBm0
Grand Wizard High
Brrrrruuuup
So the 900,000 white men who died to free your people at the orders of Abe Lincoln failed to demonstrate that black lives mattered? FUCK YOU AND DIE! You not a black American but a commie traitor sowing the seed of hate.
The Northern soldiers fought for Northern dominance over westward expansion. They had all three branches of the federal government and intended to keep it that way in perpetuity. The Southern soldiers fought for their own rights as a people to expand west and south. Slavery was a central issue in the cultural difference between North and South (European ethnic makeup was another big one, and urban vs rural), but it was just a very big tree in a "forest of competing interests." That is to say, Yankees didn't sign up to die so that blacks could move into their neighborhoods and take their jobs.
https://thedonald.win/p/11R4bqf9oV/never-forget-that-the-victors-wr/c/
They know they're intellectually and logically bankrupt, it's all about pushing the CCP's rewrite of American history.
You get it
All true, but the point is to re-write history. They're not as obtuse as they are evil.
LOL!! The Bee nails it again.....!..... oh wait....
RENAMED - GEORGE KIRBY HIGH
They said that they are renaming Dianne feinstein's high school as well, serves her right.
Who's that
Is this real?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9055391/amp/San-Francisco-rename-Lincoln-High-School-didnt-black-lives-mattered-him.html?__twitter_impression=true
So this isn't even from some sort of woke white progressive group or black lives matter, it's from a radical islamist group. Trying to take us apart from within as always.
We must have another McCarthy style inquisition to drive these seditious vermin from our institutions.
I can get behind that as long as we don't restrict our findings in these groups of "seditious vermin" to just specifically "Muslims." Let's go ahead and find and route ALL the "groups of sedition vermin" at the heads of our banks, schools, media, judicial, government institutions.
Of course— Marxists, identitarians, globalists of all stripes must be purged before the damage done to our culture is completely irreversible. In some ways, it already is. I’m just not sure we have an inquisitor up to the task. It has to be a gritty, knife-fighting, nationalist statesman.
Even the Constitution isn't an infallible shield against corruption. If it were, Jefferson would not have thought we'd need to water the tree of liberty from time to time.
Wasn't it Jefferson who said "this document can never govern a people without morals"?
Name checks out.
Daily reminder that the only thing McCarthy did wrong was not going far enough.
lmfao and how much have black lives mattered in the history of Islam?
Consider this text from a famous Islamic historian written in 1377. The whole page is interested (it basically argues that the Persian people were genocided in the Arab invasion and never really existed the same after that), but the second to last paragraph is particularly illuminating.
Great resource whenever a leftist screams the vicious blood libel 'white people invented racism.'
http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/ik/Muqaddimah/Chapter2/Ch_2_23.htm
Sweet summer child. https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/05/the_greatest_murder_machine_in_history.html
Oh they have always mattered to Muslims.....as slaves.
I'm shocked, SHOCKED I SAY
More true islamists. Not radical. Normal islamists.
as real as the CCP information warfare being waged on us as we speak
There is nothing to say - MADNESS - honestly this makes me mad and sad.
There is honestly nothing you can do about people this far gone except leave them to fail in their own schools. Never, ever send your kids to these shitholes.
Sending my to catholic school. It's not cheap, but they start learning Greek and latin in the 1st grade.
While still being forced to pay for the communist indoctrination of others who attend public schools. There is no winning.😞
Greek and Latin from an early age? That's based. On a more serious note, retreating to friendlier institutions cannot replace fighting back against the left in more mainstream institutions, or their forward march will plow over what little we have left. Public schools going farther and farther left gives them something to offer as an example of how "far right" Catholic schools are in comparison, and they will in the near future get law fare victories over us, in cases decided on by Marxist judges.
How dare you claim that white people deserve credit for black people being free. Ree
Lol Every school should be named after DeMarquis Cantrell. That’s just a black dude name I made up, but it sounds very progressive.
DeMarquis Cantrell, the often overlooked progressive icon who freed the slaves, ended Jim Crow laws, and invented the term BIPOC. Patron saint of BLM and a close relative of George Kirby.
Dude is DEFINITELY black
Naw mang see naw it MAR-KEES
I guess Abe freed white slaves. /s
That is the progressive way, Abraham Lincoln was a woman, It is known /s
LOL...darn typo thing is a joke. I tried to fix that but now kinda funny..:)
"Abe the babe."
No, on the contrary, he helped slowly, but surely create the slavery of whites in America, and it’s all coming to a head now with the help of the communists including the CCP.
It's just expected at this point
Here's what's in store for the Lincoln memorial https://youtu.be/XxC0CaHNvXg?t=59
Booker T Washington was the Larry Elder of 100 years ago. W.E.B Dubois was the Ibrahm Kendi of 100 years ago.
Babylon Bee has their work cut out for them.
Wouldn't it make everyone happy to create a black nation (like those indian nations) and let all those black people move there and do whatever they want to do there?
Not being able to leech off of white guilt and white sympathy would be racist.
👆🏻BOOM, and this is what it all truly comes down to.
Freeing them from SLAVERY wasn’t enough. Well hell, no politician can ever do enough if that isn’t.
First remove the confederacy from history... then the civil war altogether...
Then the leftists will play their game of “What did America ever do for black people? They certainly didn’t defend them from slavery”
The confederacy was based. Northern white and Southern white were fundamentally different peoples who had culturally diverged for 100+ years. In the context of Northerners coming to dominate all three branches of federal government and expanding the power of the federal government outside the bounds of the constitution, and in the context of European Romantic Nationalism of the 1850s, new borders with self-determination made perfect sense.
Yup, people either forget, or are ignoring that a war can be, and usually is made up of many different battles, and unfortunately one of those battles is along race/ethnicity lines. There is no disputing this no matter how hard you try. This is a hardcore unapologetic truth based by facts, and easily discernible patterns. Noticing, and acknowledging things in order to take advantage of your basic survival instincts does not make you an evil racist no matter how conditioned you have become by the media, and maybe even your peers to believe this.
The whole hoax of black victimization that started way longer ago than most people want to admit is the true subversion IMHO, it’s just that the commies will flock to any chink in the armor, and this is, and has been our biggest by far. Blacks were captured, enslaved, tortured, and sold by their on fucking people. I’m so fucking tired of hearing, and reading about revisionist history in order to brand me and others who look like me with “original” sin in order to guilt me to control me. FUCK THAT NOISE!!! I never have, and never will fall for that shit. I’m proud of my ancestors and what they accomplished wether they did have any part in slavery or not. Life was a motherfucker back then and everyone back then would be considered straight savages by today’s standards.
Here’s another reply I made a while ago on a similar matter.
“AKA throw the white baby out with the bath water that they just drowned it in. This is also why you don’t play the game by your rules, you play them by their rules and make them abide by them. When they try to shame you for what they perceive your ancestors may have done like when they bring up the (MUH 400 YEARS), you stand strong and proud without even flinching. You look them right in the face and tell them you’re not ashamed of anything your ancestors did. On the contrary, you tell them you are very proud of them and to possibly share ancestry with people who created the greatest country/civilization/culture that has ever existed that they wake up in everyday and force themselves to take part of/in because they also know deep down inside it’s the greatest place to live and exist because wypipo made and sustain it.
Make sure to let them know that almost everything they wake up to on a daily basis is part of huh whyte mans culture and ingenuity and by them using and taking part in any part of the system, they are submitting and admitting to the huh whyte mans greatness. If they are black(usually are), make sure you tell them you don’t blame them for being angry at their own African ancestors for capturing, abusing, and selling each other to the highest bidder where the large majority of them ended up in South America. 🤷🏼♂️
Lastly, make sure to hit them with the knockout blow by telling them you will never be ashamed of yourself or your ancestors and refuse to denounce any acts they did that has or may have lead to the creation of the greatest civilization/idea to ever come into existence. You tell them I am proud to have lighter skin and to be associated with the the creators and founders of this country whenever possible even if I’ve never had any ancestors involved with it’s creation. I then tell them that I’m sorry their ancestors were corrupt and weak, and couldn’t compete with people who might have been my ancestors who were obviously stronger and more intelligent in multiple different ways. 😎
STOP PLAYING THEIR VICTIM/SHAME GAME!!! Be proud of the creators of this country and western civilization even if they aren’t your ancestors. 💪🏻👌🏻👍🏻“
He died for black lives. What else could he possibly have done to prove they mattered to him?
In the article the gripes of Abraham Lincoln seemed to center more around the treatment of the native Americans, which makes me wonder if they equate them with being black or if the reasonings are simply screwed up and fucky.
Native Americans aren't black, they're red...
Pretty racist to lump an entirely different ethnicity and culture into BLM just to score brownie points.
REEEEEE!
They're now all lumped into the category of BIPOC -- "black indigenous people of color"...yeah, I know...
BIPOC sounds like a slur in itself
You'd be correct. But slurs rule the world for some.
It will be by next year.
Native Americans owned their fair share of black people.
That can't be I heard they worshipped nature, and only ate as much meat as they needed ree
In modern times it's easy to overlook the fact that Abraham Lincoln was, in fact, kinda based.
cringe
This was always about a Maoist type cultural revolution
Downvote away, but Lincoln was an actual white supremacist, in the sense that he believed white people were inherently superior to black people, and always would be. He believed that freeing the slaves and allowing them to stay here would lead to never ending conflict, which is why he promoted the creation of Liberia in africa, a country specifically made for freed slaves (thus the name).
He did free the slaves, which he deserves credit for, but that wasn't his original goal or the reason he launched the civil war. It was more a reason to sell the bloodiest war in American history as people began to grow tired of it. It turned a political and economic war into a moral war. By the way, I know many here love Lincoln, including Trump. It may be that the Civil War was the right move given the context etc, but at least acknowledge that it wasn't fought to end slavery. It was fought to preserve the Union. The federal government was enforcing the fugitive slave act during the war, meaning that runaway slaves were being forcibly kidnapped and returned while hundreds of thousands of people were dying to free them? No. The slavery issue was part of the discussion, but it is revisionism to act like Lincoln was on a crusade to end it.
I don't know if any of the above is why they want to change the name of the school, but those are all facts.
A few quotes from Lincoln on race:
And yes, I understand he was a product of his time.
I think none of that qualifies strictly as a white supremacist belief. He may have espoused the idea, but those quotes don't support it strongly.
None of that is supported by a belief that white people are inherently superior due to genetics. The quotes don't say the superior position is "natural" or "owed" to white people. It may be instrumental.
It is entirely possible to have a stronger/smarter entity in chains, so long as you have the accidentals for it to happen; just as it is entirely possible for a stronger team to lose a game against a much weaker team. The status quo does not immediately imply the superiority. Sometimes it is just the first-mover advantage runaway effect and we are examining a too short time scale.
Everyone white was a white supremacist because nobody wanted to live under black supremacy.
They also knew that equality was a lie, and the races will always try and gain supremacy.
We however, proved ourselves much smarter than they. I mean, look around. Winning! It's obvious to everyone the massive contributions to American society blacks have made. They've basically made everything wonderful for us Anglo-Saxon whites. How could we live with out them?
Wakanda has been achieved bigot. Why won’t you submit?
https://thedonald.win/p/11PVts2025/daily-reminder-that-just-employi/
For the most part what you're saying is pretty accurate, A lot of people look at Lincoln as a die-hard abolitionist that wanted to become president specifically to free the slaves, it's simply not true. The thing about Lincoln's quotes about ambivalence towards slavery could simply have been an appeal to moderacy at the time, it's hard to really know with politicians. I think back to Barack Obama's original stance on gay marriage, and how David axelrod said that he was faking that stance in order to appeal to moderate voters. This is a very common maneuver for politicians that are seeking radical change. Ie appear to be more moderate than you actually are.
He wasn’t a white supremacist, just a realist, and guess what, he wasn’t wrong if you go by history, especially as of recent.
https://thedonald.win/p/11PVts2025/daily-reminder-that-just-employi/
To what? George Floyd High?
Mascot: The Dindu Nuffins
They are trying to erase our history so we can become rootless, fail to understand our present, and be manipulated for where to go in the future. It's a classic tactic.
Honestly, any of that school's educators willingly going along with the name change needs to have their teacher's license revoked. This is quite literally history revisionism.
In Virginia, they changed the name of a high school named after Robert e Lee, and named it after John Lewis. The administrators gave themselves a round of applause after they voted, they don't give a damn. Even back when I was in school not too long ago, our teachers defended our historical leaders, maybe the Confederacy is a bit sketchy but this is such a rapidly radical change.
BASED!!! Too bad he cucked and fucked us all, and we’ll likely never recover. 😞
Fun fact: Having an IQ of 70 is considered being functionally retarded.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SB7RfyNrYxg/
Yeah, but at what cost.😞
https://thedonald.win/p/11PVts2025/daily-reminder-that-just-employi/
The only thing you have to say is "San Francisco" - after that, everything else can be assumed, and ignored.
St Floyd, buried in a golden casket for us all.
San Francisco is a sister city to Shanghai - local leaders have direct contact since Sen. Dianne Feinstein.
Paul Pelosi jr. for some reason became a board member on that committee in Jan. 2020 ~ it was while mummy was ignoring the virus to impeach Trump.
San Francisco is compromised.
"It EnDs WhEn It EnDs!"
-LARPy eurofag John Oliver
Watch they demand school named after fentanyl floyd later
It's more Chink cultural revolution garbage.
Put em against the wall.
Most will read this an think "LiBtArDs HaHa!" and totally miss the point that this is 100% intentional and designed to erase history.
Doesnt matter what the white dude did.. they just hate him cause he is white lol. These assholes pull down statues of people that helped black slaves escape or be free for fuck sakes.
No matter what was done for the Left-tards, it was never enough. 620,000 boys and men died in our Civil War, more than any other War and probably all of them put together. And this is thanks that President Lincoln gets and the disrespect he is shown. Do they not realize the weight of those souls that rested on his shoulders for THEM. SHAME ON THEM FOR THEIR BLATANT IGNORANCE!
You have to consider the population size at the time too, it was a big chunk of people that died in Civil War, to say that Lincoln or those people didn't care about black people is pure historical vandalism.
I'm 80% sure this guy is a pedo:
https://youtu.be/Rhd9RzwnRKE
fucking despicable....
I just realized it is in San Fransisco. They don't give a shot about anything.
None of the words that immediately spring to mind are appropriate in front of children for sure.
Welcome to the Idiocracy.
I know they don't teach American history anymore... but come on, folks. Look up why the Republican Party was founded.
Abolition of slavery was the first and most important issue. Every single person who joined the Republican Party and built it up from nothing was an abolitionist, or wanted to keep slavery out of the North and West, and to make it increasingly rare in the South.
And Abraham Lincoln was not just some guy who joined the Republican Party and happened to get picked as their candidate. Look up the Lincoln/Douglas debates, when Lincoln explained in detail all the different ways that slavery was a horrible idea.
Now, not every Republican expected that they'd be able to free any slaves or end slavery in their lifetimes. (You can compare it to the pro-life movement today.) But they were all trying to make it happen.
The horses mouth disagrees.
https://thedonald.win/p/11R4bqf9oV/never-forget-that-the-victors-wr/c/
What retards. They should stick to what they know best: eating crayons
They are trying to destroy the country it's really that simply. The sooner people get that the better.
This is the Marxist bullshit destroying the west from within
Is this real....
Yes, I link to the daily mail article in another post.
They went full retard a long time ago, that’s why the commies call them useful idiots.