I think none of that qualifies strictly as a white supremacist belief. He may have espoused the idea, but those quotes don't support it strongly.
He says he doesn't intend to promote equality as it seems a fruitless endeavor (so he challenges the feasibility of the idea). 2. There is a physical difference: dark-skinned people fare better in sunny climates against burns (the increase in melanin concentration is an evolutive improvement). 3. He is in favor of his "race" having the superior position (which I don't think is false for anyone of any "race" wherever). 4. He stands for separation.
None of that is supported by a belief that white people are inherently superior due to genetics. The quotes don't say the superior position is "natural" or "owed" to white people. It may be instrumental.
It is entirely possible to have a stronger/smarter entity in chains, so long as you have the accidentals for it to happen; just as it is entirely possible for a stronger team to lose a game against a much weaker team. The status quo does not immediately imply the superiority. Sometimes it is just the first-mover advantage runaway effect and we are examining a too short time scale.
I think none of that qualifies strictly as a white supremacist belief. He may have espoused the idea, but those quotes don't support it strongly.
None of that is supported by a belief that white people are inherently superior due to genetics. The quotes don't say the superior position is "natural" or "owed" to white people. It may be instrumental.
It is entirely possible to have a stronger/smarter entity in chains, so long as you have the accidentals for it to happen; just as it is entirely possible for a stronger team to lose a game against a much weaker team. The status quo does not immediately imply the superiority. Sometimes it is just the first-mover advantage runaway effect and we are examining a too short time scale.