He should try reading it again. Slowly. The 68% error rate is what turned the scanned ballots over to adjudication, ie, where they can assign the ballot to the candidate of choice.
ugh...yet another false hope.....cant' wait for the next piece of false breaking news......c'mon guys!! Come up with something that will stick and that won't be reasonably disputed.
You probably think those ballot watchers in Georgia just got tired too. And that the reason those suitcases of ballots were under the table are because 'they are heavy, workers didnt wanna lift them to put away do just shoved under the table for storage'.
He should try reading it again. Slowly. The 68% error rate is what turned the scanned ballots over to adjudication, ie, where they can assign the ballot to the candidate of choice.
Read the whole thread, it's hilarious, he goes on a tantrum. I love how a security "Expert" can make such claims about any system.
its dispoooooted
ugh...yet another false hope.....cant' wait for the next piece of false breaking news......c'mon guys!! Come up with something that will stick and that won't be reasonably disputed.
You probably think those ballot watchers in Georgia just got tired too. And that the reason those suitcases of ballots were under the table are because 'they are heavy, workers didnt wanna lift them to put away do just shoved under the table for storage'.