254 Time 🤣 (media.patriots.win) posted 68 days ago by Reinsurelaw +254 / -0 10 comments share 10 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (10) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 6 ▼ – VolareVia 6 points 68 days ago +7 / -1 Hate to be a buzzkill, but 'man of the year' is for influential people. Doesn't mean good or bad necessarily. Trump was also man of the year. permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – deleted 4 points 68 days ago +4 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – JohnHancock1776 3 points 68 days ago +3 / -0 I had to look this up. That is crazy, nice throwback. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – john1234 2 points 68 days ago +2 / -0 Remember to look up Stalin, too permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 68 days ago +2 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – Whitedogs 2 points 68 days ago +2 / -0 Didn't get 1946 then ? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 68 days ago +3 / -1 ▲ 2 ▼ – ScaliaWasExecuted 2 points 68 days ago +2 / -0 Stalin got it TWICE -- in 1939 and 1942. Because you can't let Hitler with a death total of 6m beat out the guy with 30m. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – fapoo 1 point 68 days ago +1 / -0 Apparently Time person of the year is more of a "marker" rather than a congratulatory award. Q people have picked up on this too. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – me-no-likely2 1 point 68 days ago +1 / -0 To be fair tho, Hitler DID kill Hitler after all permalink save report block reply
Hate to be a buzzkill, but 'man of the year' is for influential people. Doesn't mean good or bad necessarily. Trump was also man of the year.
I had to look this up. That is crazy, nice throwback.
Remember to look up Stalin, too
Didn't get 1946 then ?
Stalin got it TWICE -- in 1939 and 1942. Because you can't let Hitler with a death total of 6m beat out the guy with 30m.
Apparently Time person of the year is more of a "marker" rather than a congratulatory award.
Q people have picked up on this too.
To be fair tho, Hitler DID kill Hitler after all