18
posted ago by Obeisiak +18 / -0

this is a comment i wrote in another thread but it wasnt recognized. i thought some people might think this information is useful

at this point only a full audit and verification of signature plus a recount by hand can save the election. why you ask? devices that scan or make pictures of documents are using algorithms to process the data and those algorithms are faulty. proof?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FeqF1-Z1g0

this is a video of the very intelligent computer scientist, david kriesel, from the famous "chaos computer club" in germany. the title of the video is "david kriesel: dont trust any scan that you didnt fake yourself" and he discovered that scanners of certain companies altered the documents scanned. sometimes numbers got changed, a 6 turned into an 8, a 0 into a 9 or a 1 into a 7.

he then started to try and replicate this mistake, explains everything in detail, and manages to reconstruct the algorithm behind it. long story short: the algorithm as (accidentally) faulty to alter the documents.

why is this relevant?

if this has been done by accident, it can now be done on purpose, because it got reconstructed and understood.

this is a comment i wrote in another thread but it wasnt recognized. i thought some people might think this information is useful at this point only a full audit and verification of signature plus a recount by hand can save the election. why you ask? devices that scan or make pictures of documents are using algorithms to process the data and those algorithms are faulty. proof? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FeqF1-Z1g0 this is a video of the very intelligent computer scientist, david kriesel, from the famous "chaos computer club" in germany. the title of the video is "david kriesel: dont trust any scan that you didnt fake yourself" and he discovered that scanners of certain companies altered the documents scanned. sometimes numbers got changed, a 6 turned into an 8, a 0 into a 9 or a 1 into a 7. he then started to try and replicate this mistake, explains everything in detail, and manages to reconstruct the algorithm behind it. long story short: the algorithm as (accidentally) faulty to alter the documents. why is this relevant? if this has been done by accident, it can now be done on purpose, because it got reconstructed and understood.
Comments (0)
sorted by: