With the coming audits happening in a few days we're going to be very short on time. I believe it necessary to start the process of clarifying what to expect from the audits, versus what we'll actually end up seeing. The election night totals told a different story for the election and describe patterns that did not and could not have occurred on election day itself, so the question becomes, what if the voting count patterns present on election day had maintained stable figures? The premise is that we have four different tales of election patterns: one for election day, one for the days after, one for the coming audit and also the truth of what election irregularities really happened.

In particular we're looking for total vote count projections based on day 1 election results and what kind of totals we should have been prepared for, be they lower or higher. As an example, there were several counties nationwide that on election night reportedly ran out of ink. You have to stop and think, every election processing center estimates total vote counts based on registered voter rolls, so how is it they weren't prepared to handle the number of votes they were told to expect?

Ohio

Those audits will show oddities but without something to compare them to we might as well be looking at a rocket science thesis. Behind numbers is a story of what to expect and what actually happened. To verify the truth we have to reconcile both with what looks like under 30 days to go. Be prepared, research and ponder the thesis ahead of time. Once the results come out there will be some serious investigating to do and forgetting small details cannot be permitted. Leave no stone unturned.