There is a distinction I noticed between left and right. A leftist has a violence spectrum. They use just the bare minimum required of violence to provoke a response so that they can claim to be victims. The leftist holds nothing to be sacred (outside of egalitarianism) so violence comes easier to them. The right on the other hand believes in the sacredness of life. So violence to them isn't a spectrum, but an on/off switch. If violence needs to be done, they don't riot. They go scorched earth. Since life is sacred, they will not use violence until it is the only option left on the table. Until every other option has been exhausted.
150 years ago the Right was thrashed in the War of Southern Secession. Not only thrashed, but our civilization burned to the ground. Took generations to rebuild, nevermind get into a fighting state again. There isn't going to be waiting anymore for two reasons.
The first is that we have been in a stupor still trusting the system. For all the bad of government, we still believed that we could enact change. Either by voting, the courts, or the local level. This election has shown all three have been subverted.
The second is that people had their livelihoods and as long as government didn't do much more than raise their taxes, they wouldn't rock the boat. Now the Great Reset is plunging everyone into a depression, destroying businesses, and placing people under house arrest.
There is a fallacy in planning called normalcy bias. Basically it says that just because something hasn't happened in the past, it isn't wise to discount it off of that fact alone.
The riots had nothing to do with scaring judges. The people organizing the riots and the judges were on the same team. I’m not saying it wouldn’t be cool, it just wouldn’t get any coverage. Hell the stop the steal protest in DC were pretty much the same thing without looting.
I say we should try to offer protection for the judges who are being threatened in favor of a fair ruling. I mean we have militias right why not use them?
There is a distinction I noticed between left and right. A leftist has a violence spectrum. They use just the bare minimum required of violence to provoke a response so that they can claim to be victims. The leftist holds nothing to be sacred (outside of egalitarianism) so violence comes easier to them. The right on the other hand believes in the sacredness of life. So violence to them isn't a spectrum, but an on/off switch. If violence needs to be done, they don't riot. They go scorched earth. Since life is sacred, they will not use violence until it is the only option left on the table. Until every other option has been exhausted.
150 years ago the Right was thrashed in the War of Southern Secession. Not only thrashed, but our civilization burned to the ground. Took generations to rebuild, nevermind get into a fighting state again. There isn't going to be waiting anymore for two reasons.
The first is that we have been in a stupor still trusting the system. For all the bad of government, we still believed that we could enact change. Either by voting, the courts, or the local level. This election has shown all three have been subverted.
The second is that people had their livelihoods and as long as government didn't do much more than raise their taxes, they wouldn't rock the boat. Now the Great Reset is plunging everyone into a depression, destroying businesses, and placing people under house arrest.
There is a fallacy in planning called normalcy bias. Basically it says that just because something hasn't happened in the past, it isn't wise to discount it off of that fact alone.
You are absolutely right. Abortion has long been the dangling carrot the left would wave in front of our faces to get us distracted.
When and if we "riot" it will be to late for them bc we dont "riot" we go to WAR
The trucker strike was a good idea. Or just take over the streets around the Capital and don't leave. No need to riot and destroy.
Throw eggs at vents in stores or the mall. Eventually they'll start to stink the joint up. Blame it on a birds nest.
The riots had nothing to do with scaring judges. The people organizing the riots and the judges were on the same team. I’m not saying it wouldn’t be cool, it just wouldn’t get any coverage. Hell the stop the steal protest in DC were pretty much the same thing without looting.
Since rioting is against the law. Maybe we should start insisting that laws be enforced. That should scare the h*ll out of the left.
Burn down media buildings?
I say we should try to offer protection for the judges who are being threatened in favor of a fair ruling. I mean we have militias right why not use them?