19
posted ago by Pahlyssa +19 / -0

I know we are all eagerly awaiting December 18th for the EO 13848 to start happening, but, hear me out...

The EO 13848 states that "45 days days after the conclusion of an election..." CONCLUSION...nothing has been concluded as of yet...

Stay with me here. The alternate slates of electors have now been cast and it is of my understanding that Mike Pence will have the last say in which votes to count.

This means, that on January 6th, we can only hope that he does the right thing and casts the alternate slate of Trump votes and in that case, TRUMP WINS.

THEN, the EO 13848 goes into full force to deal with the fallout that will surely happen from POS antifa and BLM activists.

The EO wasn't made to win him the election back from the fraud and CCP deception (because he has already WON BY A LOT, it is only to handle the aftermath when everything is said and done. I doubt anything will happen on the 18th. We have to wait until the 6th of January for the election to truly "conclude"

Disclaimer This is only my own opinion and analysis since I am an autist of my own accord.

Let me know what you guys think.

I know we are all eagerly awaiting December 18th for the EO 13848 to start happening, but, hear me out... The EO 13848 states that "45 days days after the conclusion of an election..." CONCLUSION...nothing has been concluded as of yet... Stay with me here. The alternate slates of electors have now been cast and it is of my understanding that Mike Pence will have the last say in which votes to count. This means, that on January 6th, we can only hope that he does the right thing and casts the alternate slate of Trump votes and in that case, TRUMP WINS. THEN, the EO 13848 goes into full force to deal with the fallout that will surely happen from POS antifa and BLM activists. The EO wasn't made to win him the election back from the fraud and CCP deception (because he has already WON BY A LOT, it is only to handle the aftermath when everything is said and done. I doubt anything will happen on the 18th. We have to wait until the 6th of January for the election to truly "conclude" *Disclaimer* This is only my own opinion and analysis since I am an autist of my own accord. Let me know what you guys think.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
6
watchman87 6 points ago +6 / -0

very valid point. we are all thinking conclusion as Nov 3rd. conclusion would be January 6th. I think Pence will do the right thing and the next day EO goes into full affect, arrests are made of the corrupt and seizures of big tech assets

4
Joshredemann 4 points ago +4 / -0

A sound theory

4
CubanitoLopez 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think so to. Gives Trump team more time to prepare.

4
Tokens_Worth 4 points ago +4 / -0

You are correct dec 18th is another date made up by us.

TD making up dates is just like Qanons making up dates.

Both are pure speculation.

4
pithys 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's most unlikely for something to happen on the 18th since they can return the report before the 18th.

Also he doesn't need to say he is using EO. He could already be using it for all we know

3
Pahlyssa [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

That i totally agree with. I feel like it is already happening as well.

4
how_could 4 points ago +4 / -0

I would bet Trump triggers the EO before that comes down. The reason is...I don't think Trump would ever let Mike Pence take the full responsibility to save him from doom. If it's going to come down to one man's actions to "alter the outcome" he will act himself. imo.

4
Pahlyssa [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's a good point too. But I also don't think that Mike Pence spent these last 4 years not knowing not only how important this is, but what Trump has in store for deserters. I also don't want to put too much trust in Pence either. My hands are tied.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
ThisClaimIsDisputed 4 points ago +4 / -0

good point pede

how can the extent of the fraud be totally known until the conclusion? makes sense

3
SpookySpook 3 points ago +3 / -0

That would really piss people off if DNI interpreted it that way

3
Pahlyssa [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh yeah I know, it's just something I can't stop thinking about...but I guess we will just have to wait and see.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Pahlyssa [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

If it concluded nov. 3rd then trump would have won. They didn't call for biden until that Saturday.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
3
Pahlyssa [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why are you even here?

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
2
watchman87 2 points ago +2 / -0

i think the intent of conclusion is November 3rd but also speaking of the letter of the law, conclusion could be interpreted at jan 6th

3
LiskaEman 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree! He doesn't want to use the EO unless he has to.

3
DefKon1 3 points ago +3 / -0

🎶Praise the Lord and Pass the Popcorn! ...🐸🇺🇸

0
Mehocmehogan 0 points ago +1 / -1

I hope you’re right because I want to troll doomers some more.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
Pahlyssa [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It actually doesn't apply to only "foreigners". Please re-read and come back and if you still don't understand i will gladly cite.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Pahlyssa [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

And I'll counter cite to you, dumbass.

(f) the term “foreign interference,” with respect to an election, includes any covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes or institution."

OR OF ANY PERSON ACTING

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Pahlyssa [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sec. 2. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security:

(i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election;

(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i) of this section or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.

(b) Executive Order 13694 of April 1, 2015, as amended by Executive Order 13757 of December 28, 2016, remains in effect. This order is not intended to, and does not, serve to limit the Secretary of the Treasury’s discretion to exercise the authorities provided in Executive Order 13694. Where appropriate, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, may exercise the authorities described in Executive Order 13694 or other authorities in conjunction with the Secretary of the Treasury’s exercise of authorities provided in this order.

(c) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order.

You just don't learn. Do you? To be COMPLICIT is a crime here. Doesn't matter if you're foreign or not. Go to bed.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
wewillnotcomply -2 points ago +1 / -3

There were no alternate "slate" of electors. The "alternate electors" were unofficial and only serve if the current official electors basically get decertified. We have no official dueling slate of electors. The GOP can't send electors, only the legislators / governors which both voted the same in each state.

4
pithys 4 points ago +4 / -0

the alternate slates were legislators

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Pahlyssa [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did the founders of this country have any "authority" when they created it? No. They said 'no way, this is how we rule this land, go away.' That's how this works

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1