17
Comments (7)
sorted by:
3
Schrodingers_Cat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, they've got 4 more years until they have to worry about it, so.......

3
terablelizard 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump isn't going to be "living" at Mar-a-Lago because he was reelected; that crazy libtard's lawsuit's premise is therefore moot!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
skf93 1 point ago +1 / -0

What a bunch of babies. Hopefully, they wont need to worry about that fir at least four more years.

1
Old_ex_Commie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Brit tabloid. They will print ANYTHING.

1
jojoaz 1 point ago +1 / -0

How in hell can they stop him from living on his own property?

1
GizzardPuke 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fucken amp links!

Here, direct:- https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9057857/Palm-Beach-residents-demand-town-ban-Trump-moving-Mar-Lago.html

Fuck this shit:- Instead of letting websites load whatever resources they want from wherever they want, Google AMP creates its own version of the page, limited to the most basic (and fastest) web technologies. Except for a few pre-approved cases, publishers are blocked from using JavaScript—the main culprit in slow pageloads. The webpages are also hosted on Google’s servers which speeds things up even more.

If you want no Javascript NoScript or adblockers are the go, we are not in the habit of linking to google here (I did not know this till 6 months ago myself)