7935
Comments (472)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
3
JusticeWillPrevail 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have seen a few of them, but admittedly not all 50+. I just skimmed over your first link, and it looks like they simply dismissed the evidence submitted in one of the affidavits as hearsay (which doesn’t quite make sense to me, as I thought affidavits were made under penalty of perjury). However, the talking point from the Democrats/MSM is that ALL of the 50+ lawsuits were dismissed for lack of evidence, which is simply not true. I amended my post to specify this.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
JusticeWillPrevail 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the explanation; I am obviously not involved with the legal professions in any way so was unaware. And I am not disagreeing with you at all - there is plenty of other far stronger evidence they could have submitted in lieu of this. However, the fact that they submitted flimsy evidence does not mean that stronger evidence is nonexistent.