Just keep questioning them at every turn. My personal belief is that if something is true, then it will stand up under even the most intense scrutiny.

• When they say things like “50+ lawsuits filed by Trump were thrown out”, ask if all of them were thrown out due to their merits (hint: they weren’t), or if for a substantial number, any evidence was even acknowledged, let alone reviewed, prior to that decision being made (hint: it wasn’t).

• When they say things like “even such-and-such government agency claimed there was no fraud”, ask exactly what audit protocol they used to arrive at that conclusion, what were the exact steps taken, etc.

• When they say things like “but Dominion put out a public statement refuting the claims made against them”, tell them that Enron made many statements claiming everything was fine and dandy prior to its scandal going public, and that even a highly respected authority like Arthur Andersen, an accounting firm that ranked among the likes of Deloitte and PwC back in the 90’s, was complicit. This shows that public statements don’t necessarily mean anything, and if those claims were all false anyway, why didn’t they counter sue for slander?