53
posted ago by Nekroziz ago by Nekroziz +53 / -0

Hello again everyone, I know a good few of you have been waiting for this update. John Polous, thank you for falling for every trap left for you. Pedes, read closely, and trust in when I say: Dominion is in flames, and we just turned off the water. There are a few things I cannot mention now, that I will when our final report is completed. Please download recordings of the hearing. Also, you will be seeing me soon possibly, the Trump campaign is now heavily involved, but do not forget, the Trump campaign had nothing to do with the lawsuit, audit, findings, funding, nothing. But, let's get to the facts of John Polous, CEO of Dominion's testimony.

I'm going to try to stick to our data to disprove most of this, but other things I will use my personal knowledge outside of what I gleamed through the forensic audit I assisted with. I'd like you all to really pay attention when he passed the buck in essence by saying "Dominion doesn't do this, the election officials do". I also am going to write this Snopes's esque to poke fun at those hooker loving morons.

There's so many lies, I am going to break up the opening testimony and Q&A, everything will be in this thread though, I just finished the Polous open.

  1. “Dominion is a U.S company” FALSE

Dominion is not a U.S company by any stretch of the imagination. You could more say it is actually a Canadian company, as it was founded in Ontario in 2002, but that would be a lie as well. For a multi-million dollar company, having less than 6 full time employees in Colorado out of over 200 is not it's "home".

It’s headquarters and software all report Serbia as its official home. Not to neglect to mention 3 of its board members are Chinese nationals. They have 6, SIX, employees in the entire state of Colorado. They have at minimum 100 in Serbia (Belgrade). They have 200-500 employees in total (from internal records we estimate 243). All software engineers were/are located in Belgrade, Serbia. Dominion’s software has been engineered in Serbia at least since 2006. Therefore, the product was designed, and created, in Serbia, and then sent to what amounts to sales personnel in the United States.

Start doing your own research on some of their employees, of note; Aleksandar Lazarevic (SMOTE). Andy Huang (China Telecom).

  1. "Dominion's business grew in the U.S. necessitating a move in 2010" PARTIALLY FALSE, needs further explanation.

False, Dominion themselves had zero business in the United States in 2010, they simply bought Sequoia Voting Systems (who Smartmatic were involved with in 08' and had severe security issues unearthed via a similiar forensic audit) and Diebold Election Systems (who also had NUMEROUS controversy's such as chief officers of the company making statements alluding to fraud), somehow. I say somehow because as a company supplying voting machines, they only ever had a small contract to handle municipal level elections in Canada. Why would anyone invest in a company that amount of money to than buy out international voting companies? Why buy companies who are known to have security issues, and fraud allegations? Doesn't make any sense in a good faith assessment.

  1. "Dominion has been a victim of disinformation to sew doubt in the 2020 Election". FALSE.

Black and white data we forensically imaged from your machines says otherwise on your so called "disinformation"

  1. "Election officials (using Dominion) determine who is eligible to vote, enable election officials to tally the vote, report their tally's, and store the paper ballots securely". FALSE.

Dominion does not allow election officialls locally to report their counts, Dominion reported it for them. Dominion also does the tally. The paper ballots also were shredded in most counties. Also, the adjudication of the ballots is done on Dominion, and not reflected on the paper ballots. Thus, if I adjudicate your Trump vote to a Biden vote, it will not be reflected in any meaningful way.

  1. "People can speculate on algorithms that switched votes, but if any of that were true, the paper ballots wouldn't match the machine count". TRAP #1 ACTIVATED.

Mr. Polous, what would you say if I have your code showing you weighted the presidential election? What would you also say, if I said the paper ballots DO NOT match the machine's tally? And both I can prove easily. Our preliminary report shows this as well.

  1. "There were no switched or deleted votes" FALSE

I have close to 1000 votes in a county that had a total of 1400 that were reversed. Good use of a language to obfuscate, nice try.

  1. "All recounts and audits thus far have validated Dominion.." FALSE

Uh, hey Mr. Polous, over here, the audit I participated in says otherwise. Too bad Sheryl forgot to update your machines :(.

  1. "There is no algorithm that enabled fractional voting" FALSE

Again, pay close attention to the wording, nothing "enabled" fractional voting, that is just how the machines tally the vote.

  1. "Bipartisan hacks checked our machines source code and saw nothing" TRUE, but needs more info.

Dominion was validated with a software revision of 5.5. What was used in the 2020 election was 5.5-3.

  1. "Dominion has never used SolarWinds Orion platform" TRUE, needs more info.

After analyzing our images for mention of SolarWinds, Dominion did not use SW's Orion platform, but did use a custom application developed by SolarWinds, we have not completed any further anaylsis here, yet. Or done any exploit analysis.

  1. "Dominion has no ties to China or Hugo Chavez, we have never been involved in Venezeulan elections" HUGE LIE.

Hugo Chavez used Smartmatic, which is identical to Dominion. He's playing with words again. Also, Dominion's board consists of 3 Chinese nationals linked to the CCP. SM was used in the 04', '12, and '17 Venezelua elections. Interestingly, 3.7m votes were dumped 30 minutes before polls closed.

  1. "No ties to China" HUGE LIE.

3 Chinese nationals sit on your board. Per the SEC, you received $400m from the Chinese government a month before the 2020 election. "On Oct 8, 2020, Staple Street Capital filed SEC Form D offerings and sales amount of $400,000,000 with the Sales Compensation Recipient identified as UBS Securities," Dominion Voting System was acquired in 2018 by Staple Street Capital, which is affiliated with UBS Securities. UBS Securities, on the other hand, co-owns the Chinese investment bank UBS Securities Co. Ltd. with the Chinese government at a 24.99% and 75.01% share. The Chinese government owns UBS Securities Co., Ltd through its government corporations: Beijing Guoxiang at 33%, Guangdong Comm. Group at 14.01%, China Guiodian at 14% and COFCO Group at 14%.

  1. "Additionally, we have no servers in Germany or Spain" LIE.

That's quite interesting, would it be strange than if we had IP addresses linked to Spain and Germany on the outbound connections log file?

  1. "No votes were sent overseas" LIE TO THE POINT I'D GO INTO HIDING IF I SAID THIS.

Please reference my prior posts, this is an utter lie that will be disproved.

  1. "Voting systems are supposed to be closed systems (not connected to the internet). It is technologically impossible to see votes in real time or flip them" ABSURD LIE.

Wow, that does seem like the way it should be, weird why Dominion machines were networked via LAN and WLAN. Do I even have to explain the second part?

  1. "Our company was not started via Cuban money in Venezuala" TRUE.

I don't even remember anyone saying this. But Mr. Polous, will you say the same about China?

  1. "Dominion has no ties to Smartmatic, we do not use or license Smartmatic software" TRAP #2.

Really, well Sequoia did, and you own Sequoia, so there'd be a "tie" there. Also, why is Smartmatic code found on Dominion machines? And, oh, why it'd be an utter shame if I can prove it right now! https://law.justia.com/cases/delaware/court-of-chancery/2013/ca-7844-vcp.html Why does Dominion and Smartmatic have license agreements with one another? Wouldn't that be a "tie," Johnny? Wouldn't that also be a "licensed software," too? At least make this harder Johnny boy!

  1. "Dominion licensed optical scanners to Smartmatic in 2009" FALSE.

Wait, I thought you had no ties? What happened?! Also, it'd be a damn shame if I can show business dealing between Smartmatic and Dominion https://web.archive.org/web/20071226071517/http://www.sequoiavote.com/pressText.php?pressIn=41

  1. "It would not be possible for a Dominion employee to change votes, and no one has produced evidence otherwise" FALSE.

A toddler could change the election on DVS. Every machine was logged in as a super user, or admin, therefore anyone could change votes. Also, hey, over here, I have data showing you did.

  1. "We're certified by everyone I can name right now, and we're certified all the time". LIE.

There was no recertification done on the 10/23/20 5.5-3 update, or the 11/05 5.5-3.002 update.

  1. "Transmit unnofficial summary results" TRAP #3

Would be odd if the modem was connected the entire time, wouldn't it Mr. Soulos? It wouldn't be bad too if you left those modems there, right? And they only transmitted unofficial summary results, huh, interesting.

  1. "The proof of any manipulation would be on the paper ballots" LIE.

You'd love for anyone to believe that, but what if the paper ballots when optically scanned in were reversed? What if we already proved that, Johnny? You'd love it if we just did paper ballot checks, but unfortunately, we caught you with your hand in the Chinese cookie jar.

  1. "(ASOG is a) Biased, non-independent organization" ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT.

Uh, Mr. Polous, ASOG while owned by a Republican, called in independent I.T professionals to conduct this audit. I was not paid, and I am a registered democrat. The lawsuit was over a marijuana referendum, by a democrat (Mr. Bailey).

  1. "Michigan does not use ranked choice voting (weighing)" THE LIE HEARD ROUND THE GLOBE

So, if they did not use RCV, why was the option enabled, and a better question, why was it EVEN PRESENT.

  1. "A review of the ballots (in Antrim) would prove RCV was not used" OBFUSCATION TACTIC.

Yes, checking the paper ballots would prove nothing either way.

  1. "None of Antrim's tabulators were connected to the internet" See explanation.

Technically, the tabulators LAN and WLAN was enabled and connected, so they were, BUT, what was constantly connected to the internet was the EMSS group. https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/voting_system/files/DSuite55_CertConf_Scope%28FINAL%29.pdf

  1. "Adjudication only occurs on abstentee ballots" FALSE

No, adjudication occured on all write-in ballots, and via the override options, it basically put every ballot into adjudication.

  1. "Antrim County did not record ballot images". BLANTANT LIE.

  2. "Human error accounted for the "series of errors" LAUGHABLE.

Yeah, 1000 out of 1400 votes were switched by humans.

  1. "All of this is due to not updating all tabulators, lack of election officials, and it's the election officials fault" GET OUT OF JAIL ATTEMPT.

NEXT UP: JOHHNY GOES FOR BROKE, KEEPS TALKING. As always, read my prior posts for context and info on who I am, and what I know, and also, I won’t make a separate thread for the rest of Shanghai Solous’s testimony, will be here in a few hours! (Seriously this took me 3 hours to do 30 minutes there were so many lies, lol).

Comments (48)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
GreatFinley 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for all of your work! Stay safe!